مجله شهر پایدار

مجله شهر پایدار

مطالعه و بررسی ارتقا کیفیت محیطی مسکن میان‌مرتبه با تأکید بر استفاده از نور طبیعی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
عبدالرحمان صمدی طاهرگورابی 1
اردلان افلاکی 1
سجاد رضائی 2
1 گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
2 گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
10.22034/jsc.2026.541770.1871
چکیده
طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی پرتراکم در شهرهای با اقلیم معتدل و مرطوب، مانند رشت، با چالش‌هایی مانند تأمین نور طبیعی کافی روبه‌رو است. کمبود نور طبیعی اثرات منفی بر سلامت روان و آسایش ساکنان دارد و می‌تواند منجر به کاهش تمرکز، افزایش استرس، و افت کیفیت آسایش بصری شود. این شرایط، که نور مصنوعی به‌تنهایی نمی‌تواند آن را جبران کند، نیازمند توجه ویژه در طراحی معماری است. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر بهره‌گیری از نور طبیعی بر کیفیت زندگی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی پرتراکم و ارائه راهکارهای معماری برای بهبود سلامت و آسایش ساکنان انجام شد. همچنین، پژوهش به دنبال تحلیل ارتباط میان رضایت از نور طبیعی و ارتقای کیفیت زندگی بود. پژوهش از نوع توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد کمی-کیفی است. داده‌ها از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و پرسشنامه جمع‌آوری شدند. جامعه آماری شامل ساکنان فاز 1 و 2 شهرک ابریشم رشت بود که با نمونه‌گیری تصادفی، 96 پرسشنامه تکمیل و با نرم‌افزار SPSS تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که رضایت از نور طبیعی با ضریب همبستگی R=0.71 رابطه قوی با کیفیت زندگی دارد. نور طبیعی با تنظیم ریتم شبانه‌روزی، کاهش استرس و تقویت سلامت روان، بهره‌وری ذهنی و آسایش ساکنان را بهبود می‌بخشد. طراحی پنجره‌ها با نسبت پنجره به دیوار متناسب و سایه‌بان‌های قابل تنظیم، نورگیری را در اقلیم ابری رشت بهینه می‌کند. این پژوهش چارچوبی برای طراحی معماری نور محور ارائه می‌دهد که با بهره‌گیری از نور طبیعی، پایداری محیطی و کیفیت زندگی را در مجتمع‌های مسکونی پرتراکم ارتقا می‌دهد، و مبنایی برای توسعه راهکارهای عملی در طراحی سکونتگاه‌ها فراهم می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بهبود کیفیت زندگی
طراحی معماری
معماری پایدار
نور طبیعی
مجتمع مسکونی پرتراکم
  1. Abdelmoula, E., Abdelmoula, B., & Abdelmoula, N. B. (2024). Natural soundscapes, urban design and psychological well-being. European Psychiatry, 67(S1), S680. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1418
  2. Acosta, I., Campano, M. Á., Domínguez-Amarillo, S., & Muñoz, C. (2018). Dynamic daylight metrics for electricity savings in offices: Window size and climate smart lighting management. Energies, 11(11), 3143. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113143
  3. Arditi, C., Zanchi, A., & Peytremann-Bridevaux, I. (2019). Health status and quality of life in patients with diabetes in Switzerland. Primary Care Diabetes, 13(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.016
  4. Arghiani, M. (2021). Assessing residents’ satisfaction with Mehr Housing Complexes: Case study — Do Gonbadan Mehr Housing. In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable City, Tehran. [In Persian].
  5. Atamewan, E. E. (2022). Appraisal of daylighting in sustainable housing development in developing countries. Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering, 2(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.53898/josse2022224
  6. Azadeh, S. R., & Ebizadeh, S. (2022). Executive priorities in promoting the quality of new urban housing: Case study — Rasht City. Geography and Development Iranian Journal, 20(67), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.22111/j10.22111.2022.6918 [In Persian].
  7. Azizibabani, M., Bemanian, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2021). Investigation of the effects of applying social sustainability components on residential satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 29(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.29217
  8. Bhai, M. A., Abdelkader, M., Neseem, A., & Mustafa, A. (2022). Impact of the geometric form of the building envelopes on the efficiency of natural lighting in the office space. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1048(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1048/1/012024
  9. Brook, A., Ben-Dor, E., & Richter, R. (2013). Modelling and monitoring urban built environment via multi-source integrated and fused remote sensing data. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 4(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2012.759551
  10. Brown, K., Batterham, P. J., Schirmer, J., & Upton, P. (2022). Principles or practice? The impact of natural resource management on farmer well-being and social connectedness. Society & Natural Resources, 35(10), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2095091
  11. Buys, L., Vine, D., & Miller, E. (2013). What makes inner city high density liveable? Insight from residents in Brisbane, Australia. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v2i1.3385
  12. Chehab, A. (2022). Exploring the attributes of open public spaces in the developing cities. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), 28(2), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1185
  13. Edmonds, I. (2005). Daylighting high-density residential buildings with light redirecting panels. Lighting Research & Technology, 37(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782805li129oa
  14. Eisazadeh, N., Allacker, K., & De Troyer, F. (2021). Integrated energy, daylighting and visual comfort analysis of window systems in patient rooms. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 27(8), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2021.1922693
  15. Gong, K., Wang, C., & Yin, J. (2024). Effects of the natural environment on the subjective and psychological well-being of older people in the community in China. Buildings, 14(9), 2854. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092854
  16. Guo, Q. (2024). Impact of the natural environment on individuals’ psychological well-being. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 747–754. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v26i.13579
  17. Harry, W., & Sembiring, D. A. (2023). The thermal image of sun orientation and openings in residential buildings with modern tropical design concept in Medan city. Jurnal Koridor, 14(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v14i1.11893
  18. Heidari, A., & Taghipour, M. (2021). Assessing the role of architectural quality in improving quality of life in residential complexes from residents’ health perspective. Journal of Urban Studies, 10(40), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2021.609 [In Persian].
  19. Hosseini, S. H., & Bagherian, Kh. (2015). An analysis on constituent components of quality of life in Nowshahr. Geography Environment Preparation, 7(27), 55–78. [In Persian].
  20. Kahaki, Z. R., Jahangiri, H., Smith, A., & Kazemi, R. (2022). Subjective and objective survey of office lighting: Effects on alertness, comfort, satisfaction, and safety. La Medicina del Lavoro, 113(3), e2022026. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v113i3.12345
  21. Lee, K.-Y. (2020). The effect of residential environmental satisfaction on quality of life and the moderating effect of housing type: The case of Gyeonggi, Korea. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.1.3
  22. Lima, M. Z. T. d., Serra, M. M. P., Piva, S. S., & Righetto, A. V. D. (2023). The impacts of visual comfort on pediatric oncology intensive care units. Ambiente Construído, 23(3), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212023000300075
  23. Malek Afzali, A. A., Kalantari, M., & Baharestani, S. (2018). Study of sustainable development indicators in marginalized neighborhoods: Case study: Qaleh Kamkar Qom neighborhood. Journal of Sustainable City, 1(3), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2018.89751 [In Persian].
  24. Meesters, Y., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Kamphuis, J., & de Kort, Y. A. W. (2020). Housing, natural light and lighting, greenery and mental health. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 62(7), 555‑563.
  25. Mohammaddavodi, A., & Hojjati, F. (2015). Application of advanced inferential statistics in behavioral sciences (with SPSS tutorial CD) (2nd ed.). Tehran: Avaye Noor. [In Persian].
  26. Muawad, A. S., Moussa, R. R., & Guirguis, M. N. (2022). The impact of residential gated compounds on quality of life in Egypt. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(4), 1718–1724. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100429
  27. Nait-Taourirt, N., Mghazli, M. O., Kaitouni, S. I., Chafik, M., Kourar, S., & El Mankibi, M. (2023). Parametric urban optimization by balancing energy performance and environmental quality applied to residential buildings in four different climates in Morocco. E3S Web of Conferences, 412, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201008
  28. Nasrollahi, N., & Shokry, E. (2020). Parametric analysis of architectural elements on daylight, visual comfort, and electrical energy performance in the study spaces. Journal of Daylighting, 7(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2020.5
  29. Orkomi, A. A. (2024). Impacts of environmental parameters on sick building syndrome prevalence among residents: A walk-through survey in Rasht, Iran. Arch Public Health, 82, 247. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01486-z
  30. Othman, M. S. O. B. (2024). Controlling natural lighting and methods of attracting it within residential spaces. International Design Journal, 14(5), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2024.364773
  31. Pantazatou, M., Politi, E., & Oikonomou, D. (2023). The importance of the level of detail in 3D city models for daylight simulations. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 8, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.14627/537734002
  32. Pliatsika, K., Spentza, M., & Sigala, H. (2022). Natural light and architectural synthesis: The experience of residential space. 2022 Seventh Junior Conference on Lighting (Lighting), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/Lighting54159.2022.9990999
  33. Potočnik, J., Cadena, J. D. B., Košir, M., & Poli, T. (2019, July). Occupant perception of spectral light content variations due to glazing type and internal finish. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 296, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012033
  34. Raman, T. L., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Yaakob, S. S. N. (2021). The effects of different natural environment influences on health and psychological well-being of people: A case study in Selangor. Sustainability, 13(15), 8597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158597
  35. Salma, M., & Mohammed, C. (2024). Natural light and visual comfort in Algerian collective housing: Insights from a post-occupancy evaluation. Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, 5(2), e11656. https://doi.org/10.54021/seesv5n2-654
  36. Sedigh Akbari, S., & Noori, R. (2014). The status of light and color in environmental psychology in designing child-focused treatment spaces: Case study — Mofid Pediatrics Hospital. Journal of Architecture, Urban Design & Urban Planning, 7(12), 45. [In Persian].
  37. Soflaei, F., Shokouhian, M., Abravesh, A., & Amindeldar, S. (2017). Sustainability features of Iran's vernacular architecture: A comparative study between the architecture of hot-arid and Persian Gulf regions. Sustainability, 9(5), 749.
  38. Taques Martins, G., Muros Alcojor, A., & Perdomo Cruz, M. J. (2023). Influence of simulated natural light on mood and well-being: Case study at Obos Living Lab, Oslo, Norway. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 18(52), 11743. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.18.52.11743
  39. Tari, F., Ibama, B., Anthony, L.-O., & Nkiruka, E. (2024). Impact of natural light on psychological wellbeing in residential environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101936
  40. Tonello, G., Hernández de Borsetti, N., Borsetti, H., Tereschuk, L., & López Zigarán, S. (2019). Perceived well-being and light-reactive hormones: An exploratory study. Lighting Research & Technology, 51(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153518764366
  41. Türkoğlu, H., Terzi, F., Salihoğlu, T., Bölen, F., & Okumuş, G. (2019). Residential satisfaction in formal and informal neighborhoods: The case of Istanbul, Turkey. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(1), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0030
مجله شهر پایدار
دوره 9، شماره 1
بهار 1405
صفحه 121-136