Identification of Spatial Model of Urban Public Spaces with Passive Defense Approach Case Study: Tabriz city

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Architecture, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Cities, especially in their modern forms, are constantly exposed to a wide variety of hazards, and this is one of the most important issues in large cities in recent years. Therefore, it can be said that the current era is an era of urban vulnerability, because as urban life becomes more complex, cities in various dimensions face natural hazards and technological crises on the one hand, and socio-security crises on the other. One of the main elements in the city that is very important in the discussion of passive defense management, especially in the post-crisis period, are urban public spaces. Tabriz city as one of the metropolises of the country has not been an exception to this rule. This city with its large population and complex urban structures and in some dilapidated areas, is the center of all political, administrative, economic and social structures in the northwest of the country. The development of Tabriz city during the last few decades and the location of this city on a zone with high risk in terms of earthquakes and floods according to the history of numerous historical earthquakes in this city, including 4.3 in 2007 and the occurrence of earthquakes. 2.6 and 3.6 magnitude in the region as well as the existence of northern faults in Tabriz and its activity over time and the threatening dangers resulting from it, approve the necessity and importance of discussing proper location in urban spaces and the issue of passive defense. According to the issues raised and the importance of passive defense in planning and location of urban public spaces, the present study was done with the approach of recognizing the problem and examining the causal model of locating urban public spaces in Tabriz in order to plan passive defense.
 
 Methodology
The present study is applied research in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical one in terms of method. In this research, library studies and field methods have been used simultaneously to collect information. The statistical population of this study consisted of experts. Experts were selected by snowball method from among university professors and active researchers. The sample size intended to complete the questionnaire was determined by 25 university professors and research experts. In order to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha test was exerted, and its value was 0.90. This rate indicates the appropriate reliability of the questionnaire. After collecting the questionnaires using FUZZY DEMATEL in Excel software environment, the causal relationships between the criteria were determined.
 
 Results and discussion
Considering the DR values, the criteria of access to main thoroughfares, outdoor access, compatibility of land uses (observance of neighborhoods), population density, building density and physical characteristics of buildings, considering that the amount of values ​​obtained for these criteria are positive in the cause group and in other words these criteria are more effective. Criteria for access to relief centers, distance from high-risk land uses, diversity of land uses, with regard to D-R values ​​that are negative, have been identified as disabled or affected. Based on the values ​​obtained for D + R, it can be stated that among the identified criteria, the building density criterion has the highest value of D + R, which indicates that this criterion is the most important one. It can be said that the building density factor increases the vulnerability due to the volume of mass in the space during crises and will disturb the peace, etc. Therefore, paying attention to this factor, especially in public spaces, is important. After that, the criterion of observing the access hierarchy is in the second place in terms of importance. This factor should also be considered in urban planning and planning for the time of crisis, especially in order to provide relief at the scene. Because ignoring this factor can increase the rate of accidents and risks.
 
 Conclusion
This study was written to identify the spatial causal model of urban public spaces with a passive defense approach. Criteria such as access to main thoroughfares, access to relief and medical centers, observance of access hierarchy, access to open space, distance from high-risk land uses, diversity land uses, compatibility of land uses (observance of neighborhoods), population density, building density and physical characteristics of buildings were investigated using the FUZZY DEMATEL method. The results of the implementation of the FUZZY DEMATEL model showed that among the identified criteria, the criterion of access to the main thoroughfares is the most effective and important criterion for discussing location with a passive defense approach. Because access to the main thoroughfares is one of the most important factors in increasing or decreasing the vulnerability of a city in times of crisis. Also, how to access and the number of access routes by observing the hierarchy due to the facilitation of relief will have a significant impact on reducing the number of casualties. Therefore, this important principle should be considered when planning for location, as this criterion has been selected as the most important one in this research.
In the next step, the criteria of outdoor access, compatibility of land uses (observance of neighborhoods), population density, building density and physical characteristics of buildings are placed in the cause group due to the fact that the values ​​obtained for these criteria are positive. Therefore, in a place where population density and construction are high, using access to main thoroughfares and open space and distance from high-risk cabins should also be a priority in planning. Therefore, citing these issues and results, the first step in passive defense planning is to identify critical arteries, sensitive and densely populated centers, and demographics and vulnerable textures. Therefore, in examining the location of urban passive defense planning, in addition to security considerations in camouflage, concealment and dispersion of fortifications, facilities and location, natural issues, topography and strategically sensitive location, other criteria such as access to passages and identification of dense areas should also be considered in planning.

Keywords


  1. اخباری، محمد و احمدی مقدم، محمدعلی. (1393). بررسی پدافند غیرعامل در مدیریت شهری. فصلنامه بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک، دوره 10، شماره 34، صص. 69-36.
  2. اسکندری، حمید. (1390). تهدید نرم – جنگ نرم. چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات بوستان حمید.
  3. آقایی، رضا؛ آقایی، اصغر؛ حسینی، محمد و ناجی زاده، امین. (1394). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی شاخص‌های کلیدی مؤثر بر نگهداری و تعمیرات چابک با استفاده از رویکرد دلفی فازی و دیمتل فازی (مطالعه موردی: صنعت خودروسازی ایران). مدیریت صنعتی، دوره 7، شماره 4، صص. 672-641.
  4. پریزادی، طاهر؛ حسینی امینی، حسن و شهریاری، مهدی. (1389). بررسی و تحلیل تمهیدات پدافند غیرعامل در شهر سقز در رویکردی تحلیلی. مدیریت شهری، دوره 8، شماره 26، صص. 202-191.
  5. تقوایی، مسعود و جوزی خمسلویی، علی. (1391). مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی بحران در فضاهای شهری با رویکرد پدافند غیرعامل و مدل swot مطالعه موردی: مسیرهای راهپیمایی شهر اصفهان. آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، دوره 2، شماره 6، صص. 73-57.
  6. ثبوتی، هومن و علوی، پری. (1395). ضرورت پیاده‌سازی اصول پدافند غیرعامل در بازارهای تاریخی، کنفرانس ملی بهداشت. ایمنی و محیط‌زیست در صنعت ساختمان، محمودآباد.
  7. حسینی امینی، حسن؛ موسی زاده، حسین؛ بخشی، امیر و سارلی، رضا. (1398). سنجش آسیب‌پذیری ساختار شهری از منظر پدافند غیرعامل در زمان بحران (مطالعه موردی: شهر گمیشان). مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، دوره 14، شماره 2، صص. 530 –
  8. حسینی امینی، حسن؛ اسدی، صالح و برنافر، مهدی. (1390). ارزیابی ساختار شهر لنگرود جهت برنامه‌ریزی پدافند غیرعامل. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، دوره 10، شماره 18، صص. 149-129.
  9. حسینی امینی، حسن؛ امیریان، سهراب؛ بداقلو، ساسان؛ امین نیری، بهنار و پیوسته گر، یعقوب. (1398). ارزیابی ساختار شهری در راستای برنامه‌ریزی پدافند غیرعامل با روش swot (مطالعه موردی: شهر بوشهر). جغرافیا (برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای)، دوره 9، شماره 2، صص. 555-539.
  10. حسینی، سیدهادی و صدیقی، ابوالفضل. (1393). تحلیلی بر آمایش فضایی – مکانی فضاهای درمانی مشهد با رویکرد پدافند غیرعامل. آمایش سرزمین، دوره 6، شماره 2، صص. 361-335.
  11. حکیمی، هادی؛ الهامی، نسرین و پورحسینی، مهدیه. (1397). ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی توزیع خدمات شهری در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی مطالعه موردی: شهر تبریز. فصلنامه شهر پایدار، دوره 1، شماره 4، صص. 71-57.
  12. درویشی، یوسف. (1398). ارزیابی نحوه ترکیب توده و فضاهای باز در محلات شهری از منظر پدافند غیرعامل (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 1 تبریز). برنامه‌ریزی توسعه کالبدی، دوره 6، شماره 1، صص. 131-117.
  13. سرور، هوشنگ. (1398). شناسایی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری بر اساس شاخص‌های کالبدی مطالعه موردی: منطقه یک شهر تبریز. فصلنامه شهر پایدار، دوره 2، شماره 1، صص. 14-1.
  14. سعیدپور، شراره و کاشفی دوست، دیمن. (1396). مکان گزینی پناهگاه‌های شهری بارویکرد پدافند غیرعامل مطالعه موردی: شهر سقز. فصلنامه اطلاعات جغرافیایی، دوره 26، شماره 104، صص. 145-129.
  15. سعیدی، علی؛ داودی، مجتبی و حسینی امینی، حسن. (1396). مکان‌یابی ساخت پناهگاه‌های شهری با رویکرد پدافند غیرعامل. فصلنامه جغرافیا، دوره 15، شماره 53، صص. 362-351.
  16. شهسواری، حامد؛ قربانی، وحید و ربیعی، بهاره. (1394). تبیین اصول و ملاحظات دفاع شهری و رویکرد پدافند غیرعامل با تأکید بر سلولار نمودن شهرها. مدیریت شهری، دوره 14، شماره 38، صص. 390-371.
  17. علوی نسب، سید هاشم. (1396). بررسی و ارزیابی شاخص‌های تأثیرگذار در مدیریت بحران در شهر مشهد (نمونه موردی: منطقه یک شهرداری مشهد). پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز مشهد، مشهد.
  18. فرزاد شاد، مصطفی و عراقی زاده، مجتبی. (1391). مبانی برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهر امن از منظر پدافند غیرعامل. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات آهنگ آفرین.
  19. قائد رحمتی، صفر و عاشورلو، مهراب. (1390). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری مبتنی بر اصول پدافند غیرعامل. مجموعه مقالات سومین همایش ملی پدافند غیرعامل، دانشگاه ایلام، صص. 595-588.
  20. کامران، حسن؛ مرادی، مرتضی و حسینی امینی، حسن. (1391). ارزیابی بافت قدیم شهرها مبتنی بر اصول پدافند غیرعامل. مدیریت شهری، دوره 4، شماره 12، صص. 14-1.
  21. متش بیرانوند، سعیده. (1395). مکان‌یابی پایگاه‌های پشتیبانی مدیریت بحران با توجه به اصول پدافند غیرعامل (مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز). فصلنامه پدافند غیرعامل، دوره 7، شماره 2، صص. 89-73.
  22. محمدی ده چشمه، مصطفی و حیدری نیا، سعید. (1394). مدل‌سازی مکانی هم‌جواری کاربری‌های ویژه از دیدگاه پدافند غیرعامل در کلان‌شهر اهواز. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، دوره 19، شماره 2، صص. 236-211.
  23. محمدیان، محمود؛ حسینی، سید علی و حاجی آقایی کامرائی، منیره. (1397). تحلیلی بر نقش پدافند غیرعامل در کلان‌شهر تبریز بارویکرد مدیریت بحران. نشریه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دوره 9، شماره پیاپی 35، صص. 82-69.
  24. مروتی شریف‌آبادی، علی؛ عزیزی، فاطمه و جمشیدی، زینب. (1395). تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر رضایت گردشگران داخلی استان یزد با استفاده از مدل دیمتل فازی. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، دوره 11، شماره 33، صص. 104-85.
  25. موحدی نیاء، جعفر. (1388). اصول و مبانی پدافند غیرعامل. چاپ سوم، انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر.
  26. هوایی، غلامرضا. (1393). ارزیابی ضوابط و الزامات شهرسازی در کشور با دیدگاه پدافند غیرعامل. اولین همایش ملی مهندسی سازه ایران، تهران.
  27. Aghaee, R., Aghaee, A., Hoseini, M., & Najizadeh, R. (2016). Key effective factors on Agile Maintenance in vehicle industry using fuzzy Delphi method and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Industrial Management Journal, Vol.7, No.4, pp. 641-672. [In persian].
  28. Akhbari, M., & Ahmadi Moghaddam, A. (2015). Passive Defense in Urban Management. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol.10, No.34, pp. 36-69.
  29. Alavi Nasab, S.H.. (2017). Study and evaluation of effective indicators in crisis management in Mashhad (Case study: District 1 of Mashhad Municipality), Master Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning. Payame Noor University of Mashhad, Mashhad. [In persian].
  30. Allen, C. (2003). Fair Justice: the Bradford Disturbance: the Sentencing and the Impact. Journal of Social Justice, Vol.67, pp. 34- 50.
  31. Chatterjee, P. (2009). Violent Morphologies: Landscape, Border and Scale in Ahmadabad Conflict. Journal of Geoforum, Vol. 40, pp.12-30.
  32. Ghomshi, M., Rashidi Mehrabadi, A., Moazid, H., & Jalali, GH. (2009). Reducing Vulnerability of Water Utilization Facilities Based on Oil Transmission Pipelines from Ineffective Defense Perspective (Western Case Study of Ahwaz). Third National Conference on Water and Wastewater with Operation Approach, [In persian].
  33. Darvishi, Y. (2019). Evaluation of the Composition of Masses and Open sSpaces in Urban Neighborhoods, a Passive Defense Perspective (Case Study: District 1, Tabriz). journal of Physical Development Planning, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 117-131. [In persian].
  34. Eskandari, H. (2011) Soft Threat - Soft War. Second Edition, Tehran: Bustan Hamid Publications. [In persian].
  35. Farzad Shad, M., & Iraqizadeh, M. (2012). Principles of Safe City Planning and Design from the Perspective of Passive Defense. First Edition, Tehran: Ahang Afarin Publications [In persian].
  36. Ghaed Rahmati, S., & Ashourloo, M. (2011). Urban Land Use Planning Based on the Principles of Passive Defense. Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Passive Defense, Ilam University, pp. 595-588. [In persian].
  37. Hakimi, H., Elhami, N., & Pourhosseini, M. (2019). Evaluating and Ranking the Distribution of Urban Services in Informal Settlements Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 57-71. [In persian].
  38. Havaie, G. (2014) Evaluation of criteria and requirements of urban planning in the country from the perspective of passive defense. the first national conference on structural engineering in Iran, Tehran. [In persian].
  39. Hoseini, S. H., & Sedigi, A. (2014). An analysis on spatial planning of therapeutic Spaces of Mashhad with emphasis on passive defensive approach, Town and Country Planning. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 335-361. [In persian].
  40. Hosseini Amini, H., Asadi, S., Bernafar, M. (2011). Assessing the structure of the city of Langarud for passive defense planning. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 18, pp. 149-129. [In persian].
  41. Hosseini Amini, H., Mousazadeh, H., Bakhshi, A., Sarli, R. (2019). Measuring the Vulnerability of Urban Structures from the Point of View of Passive Defense during the Crisis (Case Study: Gomishan City). journal studies of Human Settements Planning, Vol.14, No.2, PP. 509-530. [In persian].
  42. Huseini Amini, H., Amiriyan, S., Bodaghlo, S., Amin Nayeri, B., & Peyvastegar, Y. (2019). valuation of Urban Structure in the Planning of Civil Defense Using SWOT (Case Study: Bushehr City), Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planning), Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 539-555. [In persian].
  43. Kamran, H., Moradi, M., & Hosseini Amini, H. (2012). Assessing the old context of cities based on the principles of passive defense, urban management, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 1-14. [In persian].
  44. Mohammadian, M., Hosieni, s. A., & Hajiaghaei Kamrani, M. (2019). Analysis of the role of passive defense in Tabriz with crisis management approach. Research ang urban planning, Vol. 9, No. 35, pp. 69-82. [In persian].
  45. Mesh Biranvand, S. (2020). Disaster Management Support Centers Localization Based on the Principles of Passive Defense (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis). passive defense, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 73-89. [In persian].
  46. Mitroff, I. I., Shrivastava, P., & Ferdaus Udwadia, E. (1978). Effective Crisis Management. Journal Of Academy of Management Executive, Vol.1, pp.60-70.
  47. Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, M., & Heidarinia, S. (2015). Spatial modeling of the proximity of special uses from the perspective of active defense in the metropolis of Ahvaz. Journal of Space Planning and Planning, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 236-211. [In persian].
  48. Morovati sharifabadi, A., Azizi, F., & Jamshidi, Z. (2016) Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Satisfaction of Domestic Tourists in Yazd Province Using Fuzzy DEMATEL. tourism Management Studies Journal of Management & Accounting School, Vol. 11, No. 33, pp. 85-104. [In persian].
  49. Movahedinia, J. (2009) Principles and Foundations of Passive Defense. Third Edition, Malek Ashtar University of Technology Press. [In persian].
  50. Prizadi, T., Hosseini Amini, H., & Shahriari, M. (2010). Investigation and analysis of passive defense measures in Saqez city in an analytical approach, urban management, Vol. 8, No. 26, pp. 202-191. [In persian].
  51. Sabouti, H., &Alavi, P. (2016). The need to implement the principles of passive defense in historical markets, National Conference on Health. Safety and Environment in the Construction Industry, Mahmoud Abad. [In persian].
  52. Saeedi, A., Davoodi, M., Hosseini Amini, H. (2017). Locating the construction of urban shelters with a passive defense approach, Journal Geography, Vol. 15, No. 53, pp. 362-351. [In persian].
  53. Saidpour, S., & Kashefidust, D. (2018). Urban Shelters Localization with Passive Defense Approach-Case Study: Saqqez City. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data, Vol. 26, No. 104, pp. 129-145. [In persian].
  54. Sarvar, H. (2019). identification worn-out urban textures Based on the physical parameters Case Study: Region One  Tabriz city. Journal of Sustainable City, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-14 [In persian].
  55. Shahsavari, H., Qorbani, V., & Rabiee, B. (2015). Explaining the principles and considerations of urban defense and passive defense approach with emphasis on cellularization of cities. urban management, Vol. 14, No 38, pp. 390-371. [In persian].
  56. Taghvaei, M., & Jovzi Khameslouei, A. (2012). Management and Planning of Crisis in Urban Spaces with Passive Defense Approach and SWOT Model. Geographical Planning of Space Journal, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 57-73. [In persian].