Sustainable city

Sustainable city

The Functional Effect of Public Spaces in the Stability of the Sense of Place Belonging the Case Study: Public Spaces in the Central Texture of Zanjan City

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Department of Education Geography, Farhangian University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
The sense of place manifests a person's sense of space with which he has established emotional relationships and feels alive with attachment and dependence from being in it. This research method is based on a combination (qualitative and quantitative) based on interpretative and statistical methods. The data collection method is library-field (interview, observation, and questionnaire). The studied community includes the users of public spaces in central Zanjan city, which was studied in a sample of 380 subjects. The research indicators include four main components as place identity, place attachment, place dependence, and social connection. Data analysis is based on inductive and quantitative interpretation based on multivariate regression according to the structure of path analysis and a posteriori model. The results show that the public spaces with different functions in the central context of Zanjan city function differently despite the tendency towards desirability. The sense of belonging to a place is formed in two aspects as the sense of the main place and the sense of the surrounding place, the intensity of which decreases according to the social stratification from the center to the periphery, but it does not reach destruction. Multivariate regression at the confidence level of 95% with 96% effectiveness explains the path of indicators of the sense of place belonging, and the posterior model shows the significant difference of the variables of sense of place belonging in different functions of the space with an acceptable level of significance. The findings state that the structure of activity and the sense of place are different according to the type of function of the space. Therefore, places in spaces with similar functions have the same sense of belonging with a minimal significant difference. Thus, the diversity of the functions of the space affects the sense of local belonging, and it becomes stronger and weaker according to the functional type of the space
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The distinction of a place for the citizens and the feeling of attachment, vitality, and dependence forms a sense in which the social bond is established and creates a sense of belonging to a place. In public spaces with diverse functions, the amount of this feeling affects the citizens' vitality and social vitality. The variety of activities combined with the factors of space design are the factors of attraction and permanence of the population in the desired space. As a result, it reduces the social effects caused by building density, leading to social density. By examining the various functions of the public spaces in the central texture of Zanjan city (as the attracting pole of the urban population), this research has investigated the effect of space diversity on citizens' sense of place belonging. The innovation of this research is to deal with the functional diversity of public spaces on a spatial scale in order to find out:
-What is the role and effect of the functional diversity of spaces on different scales in the sense of spatial belonging?
- How is the difference in the sense of place belonging in the various functions of the central texture spaces of the city and how is the relationship between them?
 
Methodology
The current research structure was formed based on the combined qualitative method based on interpretative inference and quantitative method based on descriptive-inferential statistical methods, which are practical in terms of nature and purpose. The studied statistical population includes consumers (citizens) of public spaces in the central texture of Zanjan city (Imam pedestrian walkway, Sabzeh Maidan complex, cultural and historical places, market, and business). The data collection method was a document and survey based on observation, case interviews, and questionnaires. Due to the unknown size of the studied population, an unstructured sampling method based on saturation was used, the number of which was 380 for the questionnaire method and 70 for the interview method. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using
 
SPSS27.1 software with a multivariate regression model based on path effect and posterior model. The research variables include the four main components of identity, attachment, dependence, and social connection of the place, with 41 indicators, part of which corresponds to the research model of Low and Altman, and the researcher creates the other part. In order to localize the narrative validity, the studied variables were sent to about 25 experts in different fields (geography, psychology, urban planning, sociology, urban design, and other urban field experts). They requested coefficients from 1 to 9 for the variables and items. (number 1 is the lowest value, and number 9 is the highest). The results show an average coefficient of 7.48, which shows the appropriate validity of the variables. The reliability of the research was obtained based on Cohen's kappa coefficient and Cronbach's alpha. The obtained value of Cohen's kappa for qualitative analysis is equal to 0.68, and Cronbach's alpha for quantitative analysis is equal to 0.81, showing the good reliability of the tools and variables. The figure shows a conceptual model of the research.
 
Results and discussion
Despite their functional diversity, the public spaces of the city center have an above-average sense of place belonging with a tendency towards desirability. There is a sense of belonging to a place in the center of the place and the space around it, which has decreased in intensity by moving from the center of focus to the surrounding area, but it has not disappeared and is not completely removed. The variety of functions in public spaces in the city's center leads to a difference in the sense of belonging to a place. In contrast, public spaces with collectivist functions have created a greater sense of belonging. The radar of changes in the spatial sense of belonging in the public spaces of the city center with a tendency towards the periphery has shown the relative desirability of the sense of belonging indicators. In contrast, the radar curve in collective, cultural, and historical spaces tends more toward the periphery (maximum desirability). 95% confidence coefficient and acceptable level of significance (less than p-value: 0.05) show the difference and the significant difference of various functional spaces in the central texture of the city. It is between collective (collectivist and cultural) and linear and point spaces (pedestrian and commercial). On the other hand, the sense of place belonging in the functional spaces of the central tissue indicates a significant difference between spaces with similar functions. There is a significant internal difference between the spaces with the function of pause and stop. Short standing, the restriction of sitting and resting, little discourse (linear pedestrian space and business points), and the spaces with the function of long-term stopping and standing, the design of sitting and talking and resting (discourse-oriented) (Green Square) and the Grand Mosque) in terms of the sense of belonging to a place is at the minimum level (0.04).
 
Conclusion
The two-way issue of activity and sense of place are different according to the type of function of the space, so it is possible that places located in spaces with similar functions have the same sense of belonging with a minimal significant difference, while the adjacent places do not have similarity and connection, or have a minimal connection. In general, the diversity of the functions of the space affects the sense of local belonging, and it becomes stronger and weaker according to the functional type of the space.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The distinction of a place for the citizens and the feeling of attachment, vitality, and dependence forms a sense in which the social bond is established and creates a sense of belonging to a place. In public spaces with diverse functions, the amount of this feeling affects the citizens' vitality and social vitality. The variety of activities combined with the factors of space design are the factors of attraction and permanence of the population in the desired space. As a result, it reduces the social effects caused by building density, leading to social density. By examining the various functions of the public spaces in the central texture of Zanjan city (as the attracting pole of the urban population), this research has investigated the effect of space diversity on citizens' sense of place belonging. The innovation of this research is to deal with the functional diversity of public spaces on a spatial scale in order to find out:
-What is the role and effect of the functional diversity of spaces on different scales in the sense of spatial belonging?
- How is the difference in the sense of place belonging in the various functions of the central texture spaces of the city and how is the relationship between them?
 
Methodology
The current research structure was formed based on the combined qualitative method based on interpretative inference and quantitative method based on descriptive-inferential statistical methods, which are practical in terms of nature and purpose. The studied statistical population includes consumers (citizens) of public spaces in the central texture of Zanjan city (Imam pedestrian walkway, Sabzeh Maidan complex, cultural and historical places, market, and business). The data collection method was a document and survey based on observation, case interviews, and questionnaires. Due to the unknown size of the studied population, an unstructured sampling method based on saturation was used, the number of which was 380 for the questionnaire method and 70 for the interview method. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using
 
SPSS27.1 software with a multivariate regression model based on path effect and posterior model. The research variables include the four main components of identity, attachment, dependence, and social connection of the place, with 41 indicators, part of which corresponds to the research model of Low and Altman, and the researcher creates the other part. In order to localize the narrative validity, the studied variables were sent to about 25 experts in different fields (geography, psychology, urban planning, sociology, urban design, and other urban field experts). They requested coefficients from 1 to 9 for the variables and items. (number 1 is the lowest value, and number 9 is the highest). The results show an average coefficient of 7.48, which shows the appropriate validity of the variables. The reliability of the research was obtained based on Cohen's kappa coefficient and Cronbach's alpha. The obtained value of Cohen's kappa for qualitative analysis is equal to 0.68, and Cronbach's alpha for quantitative analysis is equal to 0.81, showing the good reliability of the tools and variables. The figure shows a conceptual model of the research.
 
Results and discussion
Despite their functional diversity, the public spaces of the city center have an above-average sense of place belonging with a tendency towards desirability. There is a sense of belonging to a place in the center of the place and the space around it, which has decreased in intensity by moving from the center of focus to the surrounding area, but it has not disappeared and is not completely removed. The variety of functions in public spaces in the city's center leads to a difference in the sense of belonging to a place. In contrast, public spaces with collectivist functions have created a greater sense of belonging. The radar of changes in the spatial sense of belonging in the public spaces of the city center with a tendency towards the periphery has shown the relative desirability of the sense of belonging indicators. In contrast, the radar curve in collective, cultural, and historical spaces tends more toward the periphery (maximum desirability). 95% confidence coefficient and acceptable level of significance (less than p-value: 0.05) show the difference and the significant difference of various functional spaces in the central texture of the city. It is between collective (collectivist and cultural) and linear and point spaces (pedestrian and commercial). On the other hand, the sense of place belonging in the functional spaces of the central tissue indicates a significant difference between spaces with similar functions. There is a significant internal difference between the spaces with the function of pause and stop. Short standing, the restriction of sitting and resting, little discourse (linear pedestrian space and business points), and the spaces with the function of long-term stopping and standing, the design of sitting and talking and resting (discourse-oriented) (Green Square) and the Grand Mosque) in terms of the sense of belonging to a place is at the minimum level (0.04).
 
Conclusion
The two-way issue of activity and sense of place are different according to the type of function of the space, so it is possible that places located in spaces with similar functions have the same sense of belonging with a minimal significant difference, while the adjacent places do not have similarity and connection, or have a minimal connection. In general, the diversity of the functions of the space affects the sense of local belonging, and it becomes stronger and weaker according to the functional type of the space.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 
Keywords

  1. Bodnar, J. (2015). Reclaiming public space. Urban Studies, 52(12), 2090–2104. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015583626
  2. Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.
  3. Carmona, M., Freeman, J., Rose, S and Woolley, H. (2004). The Value of Public Space: How High Quality Parks and Public Spaces Create Economic. Social and Environmental Value. cabe space.
  4. Chitrakar, R. (2016). Meaning of Public Space and Sense of Community: The Case of New Neighbourhoods in the Kathmandu Valley. in International Journal of Architectural, 10(1), 213-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v10i1.807
  5. Jaalama, K., fogerholm, N., Julin, A., & Virtanen, J. (2021). Differences introduced by prior familiarity with the place. landscape-and-urban-planning, 207(8), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103996
  6. Jorgensen, B. & Stedman, R. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude:Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
  7. Kamalipour, H., J. Yeganeh, A., & Alalhesabi, M. (2012). Predictors of place attachment in urban residential environments. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.111
  8. Kokubun, K., Ino, Y., & Ishimura, K. (2020). Social capital and resilience make an employee cooperate for coronavirus measures and lower his/her turnover intention. ArXiv preprint arXiv, 2007.07963, 1-22.
  9. Kyle, G; Mowen, A and Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(24), 439-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001
  10. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman, & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp.1–12). New York: Plenum Press.
  11. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Meetiyagoda, L., Mahanama, P., Ley, A., & Amarawickrama, S. (2024). A ladder of sense of place: Case study of Crow Island Beach Park, Sri Lanka. Journal of Cities, 145. 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104695.
  13. Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
  14. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93 – 116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
  15. Relph,E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: pionnt.
  16. Sagan, H. N. (2015). Specters of '68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space. UC Berkeley. ProQuest ID: Sagan_berkeley_0028E_15521. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m5k38z3n. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fw554xm.
  17. Shamai, Sh. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-K
  18. Tohjiwa, A D. (2022). The Concept of "Place" in Urban Studies. Ergonomics International Journal,4(6), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000291
  19. Ujang, N. (2012). Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49(2),156-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.014
  20. Zeybek, O. (2020). The Relationship Between Planting Design and Urban Identity. Journal Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University. 34, 185-195.
  21. Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79. 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025
  22. Afzali, R., Badiee Azandehie, M., Yazdanpanah Dero, Q., & zamani, A. (2022). Space and Place: Critical Reading. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(65), 72-114https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1401.18.65.3.9 [in Persian].
  23. Amiri, S. N., Rostami, M. H., & Danaeifar, S. (2022). Evaluation of Factors Affecting Citizens' Sense of Belonging to Urban Spaces a Case Study the Enghelab Square of Bushehr Port. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(2), 149-164. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.337599.1653 [in Persian].
  24. Bandarabad, A. (2017). A Comparative Study between Place and out of Place Concepts in City Social Development with an Environmental Psychology Approach. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 8(32), 139-170. doi: 10.22054/qjsd.2017.8428 [in Persian].
  25.  Daviran, E. (2023). Comparative assessment of temporal-spatial rhythm of planning theoretical and practical geography courses in university planning system. Research in Teaching, 3(11), 130-149. doi: 10.22034/trj.2023.139946.1888 [in Persian].
  26. Daviran, E. (2023). Evaluation of the design components of children's living and leisure space (case Study: playground of district parks in 4 region of Zanjan city). Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 3(9), 83-100. doi: 10.30495/juepd.2023.1979475.1143 [in Persian].
  27. Daviran, E. (2023). Examining the rhythm of behavioral hangouts in urban parks (Case study: Baharestan and Ibn Sina Zanjan Gardens). Motaleate Shahri, 12(48), 17-28. doi: 10.34785/J011.2022.024 [in Persian].
  28. Daviran, S & Kariminezhad, M. (2014). Urban identity and sense of place in new public spaces (Nahjolbalagheh Park in Tehran city). Hoviatshahr, 8(18), 81-92. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17359562.1393.8.18.8.3 [in Persian].
  29. Farajollahzadeh, R., & Salehinia, M. (2021). Redefining Place by Focusing on the Process of Creation and Explanation of Place Centrality. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(102), 69-82 doi: 10.22034/bagh.2021.256492.4708 [in Persian].
  30. Kameli, M., & Azemati, H. (2021). Investigating the relationship between the sense of belonging to the place and the level of social security of citizens - Case study: Qom-. Jgs, 21 (61), 241-258.http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jgs.21.61.241 [in Persian].
  31. Kanter, David (1997). The psychology of place, translated by Maryam Amirikhah, Fza publishing house: Tehran. [in Persian].
  32. Lynch, K. (2021). The image of the city, translated by Manouchehr Mazini, 14th edition, Tehran University Press: Tehran. [in Persian].
  33. mohammadi, B., & sharepour, M. (2018). Investigation of the Youth’s Social Relationships and Their Interactions in Park (Case Study: Amol City). Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development), 12(4), 131-166. https://doi.org/10.22055/qjsd.2018.13683 [in Persian].
  34. Motlagh, M., & Farhadipour, N. (2020). Investigating the Relationship between Sustainable Social Development and the Sense of Spatial Belonging in Boroujerd. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 12(48), 109-120. [in Persian].
  35. Pourahmad, Ahmad (2012). The realm and philosophy of geography. The sixth edition. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian].
  36. Rahimi, H. (2020). Investigation and analysis of urban public space components to achieve social interactions (Case study: District 12 of Tehran). Geography (Regional Planning), 10(40), 691-708. Doi:https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1399.10.4.39.6 [in Persian].
  37. Sajjadian N, Nemati M, Gashtil F. (2019). Role of the Place on Information and Communication Technology Effectiveness on Women’s Gender Identity; a Case Study of Ahvaz City, Iran. GeoRes, 34 (3), 413-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/geores.34.3.413 [in Persian].
  38. Salaripour, A., Ramezani, H., Mehrjo, M., & Ghorbanzadeh, N. (2018). Investigating the impact of the quality of urban third places on citizens' sense of belonging; Case study: Cultural-historical pedestrian walkway of Rasht. Iranian Islamic City Studies, 10(38), 37-56. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1398.10.38.3.9 [in Persian].
  39. Zabetian, E., & Kheyroddin, R. (2018). Assessing the Sense of Place Levels in Urban Spaces (Case study: Imam Khomeini Square and Imam Hossein Square, Tehran City). Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2018.10448.1091 [in Persian].
  40. Azimi, E., Mobara, H., & farzadmanesh, M. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Spatial Habitat and Environmental Quality on Improving Satisfaction of Citizens from Localities (Case study: Keshavarz District 6th District of Tehran). Jgs, 23 (68), 365-382 http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jgs.23.68.365 [in Persian].