Evaluation of Effective Factors on the Happiness of Citizens in Public Spaces of Tabriz City

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

10.22034/jsc.2020.235573.1260

Abstract

 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Individual and social happiness and well-being have been one of the most important and prominent human aspirations in all previous periods. Also, creating a mental image of an ideal society may be one of the general concerns of all philosophers and social scientists, especially first philosophers; a society that promises an end to human suffering and paves the way for paradise on earth. Veenhoven gives the most comprehensive definition of happiness; in that happiness refers to the degree to which a person judges the quality of his or her overall quality of life; in other words, happiness means how much a person loves life. Thus, happiness, although defined to a generally mental and individual feeling, its fluctuations are strongly influenced by direct and indirect external factors and cannot be imagined apart from them. According to the Global Happiness Report in 2019, Iran is ranked 118th out of 153 countries. In the present study, the aim is to investigate and explain the criteria affecting the happiness and social vitality of citizens in the public spaces of Tabriz. In order to meet this goal, it was emphasized in the theoretical foundations section that in general, happiness and urban public spaces affect each other.
 
Methodology
The present study is a practical one in order to achieve a comprehensive analysis of the components affecting happiness in public spaces of Tabriz. The approach in this study is quantitative. To evaluate the developed components in the conceptual model, survey research and descriptive-analytical methods have been used. In this context, a large share of data is collected in the form of surveys and questionnaires. In this regard, a questionnaire of 87 questions was developed based on effective identified components on the happiness. The five selected urban spaces were examined stand on quantitative questions from the questionnaire. The results are included in SPSS19 software and to analyze and explain the components that affect the happiness of citizens, factor analysis, regression, Pearson and Enova tests have been used.
 
Results and Discussion
The aim of this study is to investigate and explain the effective criteria on the happiness and social vitality of citizens. In order to reach this goal, it was emphasized in the theoretical foundations section that in general, happiness and urban public spaces affect each other. Accordingly, in this paper and in the data analysis section, the suitability of the proposed model was investigated to evaluate the criteria affecting people's happiness and social vitality. Initially, based on factor analysis, 87 effective components were divided into 8 classes. After ensuring the validity of the model and recognizing the main factors affecting the level of social happiness and vitality in the selected urban public spaces with regression test and the relationship of these dimensions with each other, Pearson correlation test was performed. The research findings indicate that based on the results obtained from statistical studies, all conceptual variables of research, including dimensions of urban public space quality, physical-ecological dimensions, perceptual-semantic dimensions, cultural-economic dimensions, social dimensions, mental dimensions, political-managerial dimensions, individual-personality dimensions have a significant relationship with the concept of happiness and social vitality. The results show that in view point of the citizens, the quality of urban space is the most important dimension that has a more specific role in promoting the happiness and social vitality of citizens and also has the greatest impact on citizens’ happiness so that should be prioritize in urban space planning.
 
Conclusion
The results of the study of the average rank of the components affecting the level of happiness and social vitality of citizens show that satisfaction with family relations has the highest average rank and the level of satisfaction with government subsidies and government services has the lowest average rank. Components related to the environment and urban space also have the lowest average rating of bicycle infrastructure, climate comfort and environmental furniture, which need planning. And the memorable, readability and adaptability of spaces and spatial desirability are the highest average. An examination of the level of happiness in selected urban public spaces shows that there is a significant difference between the dimensions of urban space quality, physical-ecological dimensions and perceptual-semantic dimensions. In terms of urban space quality, Laleh Park Complex and Tabriz Grand Bazaar have the highest score. The most important strategies to improve the quality of happiness in urban public spaces are to focus on the dimensions of urban space quality, physical-ecological dimensions and semantic perceptual dimensions. Security is the most significant way to improve the quality of urban space and thus promote happiness. In the physical-ecological field, access to the park and green spaces is the most considerable solution. In the perceptual-semantic field, promoting the vitality of urban space and encouraging activity, presence and communication with space are the most important and efficient strategy. In the cultural-economic field, creating various cultural programs can be the most effective way to promote happiness in public urban spaces.

Keywords

References

1)      آرگیل، مایکل (1385) روانشناسی شادی، مترجمین: مسعود گوهری انارکی؛ حمید نشاط دوست؛ حسن پالاهنپ؛ فاطمه بهرامی، ویرایش سوم، اصفهان: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
2)      آیزنک، مایکل (1378) همیشه شادباشید، ترجمه ز. چلونگر، تهران: انتشارات نسل نواندیش.
3)      اینگلهارت، رونالد (1372) تحول فرهنگی در جامعه پیشرفته صنعتی، مترجم: مریم وتر، تهران: کویر.
4)      حبیب پور گتابی، کرم و صفری شالی، رضا (1391) راهنمای جامع کاربرد SPSS در تحقیقات پیمایشی (تحلیل داده‌های کمی)، تهران: متفکران- لویه.
5)      ربانی، رسول؛ ربانی، علی؛ محمدرضا، گنجی (1390) رویکردی جامعه‌شناختی در زندگی روزمره سرپرستان خانوار در شهر اصفهان، مسائل اجتماعی ایران،دوره 2، شماره 1، صص. 73-39.
6)      زبردست، اسفندیار؛ خلیلی، احمد؛ دهقانی، مصطفی (1392) کاربرد روش تحلیل عاملی در شناسایی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری،، مجله هنرهای زیبا، دوره 18، شماره 2، صص. 42-27.
7)      طهماسبی، فرخ؛ نظم فر، حسین؛ قنبری، ابوالفضل؛ رضای نیا، حسن (1399) ارزیابی و تحلیل ترجیحات معیارهای سرزندگی شهری در خیابان ولیعصر تهران، فصلنامه شهر پایدار، دوره 3، شماره 1، صص. 18-1.
8)      فصیحی، حبیب الله؛ پریزادی، طاهر؛ کرمی، تاج‌الدین (1398) بررسی نقش پیاده راه‌ها در سرزندگی فضاهای عمومی مطالعه موردی: پیاده راه حرم شهرری، فصلنامه شهر پایدار، دوره 2، شماره 4، صص. 15-1.
9)     Ambrey, Christopher. & Fleming Christopher. (2013) Public Greenspace and Life Satisfaction in Urban Australia, Urban Studies,Vol.51, No.46, pp.1290-1321.
10) Argyle, Michael. (1997) Is happiness a cause of health? Psychology and Health,Vol. 12, No.6, pp.769-781.
11)  Ballas, Dimitris. (2013) What makes a ‘happy city’?, Cities, Vol. 32, pp.39-50.
12) Ballas, Dimitris. & Danny, Dorling. (2013) The geography of happiness, The Oxford handbook of happiness.
13) Bostic, Terence. & Ptacek, J.T. (2001) Personality factors and the short-term variability in subjective well-being, Journal of happiness studies, Vol.2, No.99, pp.355-375.
14) Bravo, L. (2012) Public spaces and urban beauty, The pursuit of happiness in the contemporary European city, In European Symposium on Research in Architecture and Urban Design, University of Oporto, pp.12-15
15) Bruni, L. & Stanca, L. (2008) Watching Alone. Happiness, Relational Goods and Television, Journal of Economic Behavoir and Organization, Vol.65, No.3-4, pp.506-528.
16) Costanza, R. & Fisher, B. & Ali, S. & Beer, C. & Bond, L. & Boumans, R. & Gayer, D. E. (2008) An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy, SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society.
17) Diener, E. (2000) Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, Vol.55, No.1, pp.1- 34.
18) Diener, E. & Lucas, R. E. (1999) Personality and Subjective Well-Being.Well-Being, Foundations of Hedonic Psychology: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.
19) Diener, E. & Seligman, M. E. (2002) Very happy people, Psychological science, Vol.13, No.1, pp.81-84.
20) Diener, E. & Oishi, S. & Lucas, R, E. (2004) Personality, culture, and subjective wellbeing: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life, Annual review of psychology,Vol. 54, No.1, pp.403-425.
21) Dolan, P. & Layard, R. & Metcalfe, R. (2011) Measuring subjective well-being for public policy.
22) Easterlin, R. A. (2003) Explaining happiness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.100, No.19, pp.11176-11183.
23) Eisazadeh, Nasim. & Hassan, Vahdani. (2017) The Role of Urban Spaces and Structures in Increasing the Social Vitality of Citizens with an Emphasis on Urban Design Approaches, Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, Vol.17, No.3-4, pp.77-86.
24) Eysenck, H.J. (1990) Happiness, Fact and Myths, London, Lawrence Erlbaum.
25) Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. (2000) Maximising happiness? German economic review,Vol. 1, No.2, pp.145-167.
26) Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. (2002) Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Iinstitutions Affect Well-Being, Princeton, NJ.
27) Frey, B, S. & Stutzer, A. (2012) The use of happiness research for public policy. Social choice and welfare, Vol.38, No.4, pp.659-674.
28) Galatzer-Levy, R, M. (2000) Does psychoanalysis work?.Berghahn Books. http:// www.worldlifeexpectancy.com
29) Helliwell, J. & Layard, R. & Sachs, J. (2020) World Happiness Report, New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
30) Islam, G. & Wills-Herrera, E. & Hamilton, M. (2009) Objective and subjective indicators of happiness in Brazil: The mediating role of social class, The Journal of social psychology, Vol.149, No.2, pp.267-272.
31) Szołtysek, J. & Twaróg, S. (2018) Happy City-How to Plan and Create the Best Livable Area for the People. Springer.
32) Karimi Azeri, A. R. & Aladini, M. & Amirnezhad Mozhdehi, M. (2018) Investigating the Role of Space Factors in Promoting Vitality for Designing Sports Complex, Civil Engineering Journal, Vol.4, No.7, pp.1738-1749.
33) LEE, A. K. & Maheswaran, R. (2011) The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence, Journal of Public Health,Vol.33, No.22, pp.212-222.
34) Lu, L. & Gilmour, R. & Kao, S. F. (2001) Cultural values and happiness: An East-West dialogue, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.141, No.4, pp.477-493.
35) Lucas, R. E. & Gohm, C. L. (2006) Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures, Culture and subjective well-being,Vol.3, No.2, pp.91-317.
36) Lyubomirsky, S. & Kennon M. & Sheldon, S, D. (2005) Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change, Review of general psychology, Vol.9, No.2, pp.111-131.
37) MAAS, J. & VERHEIJ, R. A. & Groenewegen, P. P. & DE VRIES, S. & Spreeuwencerg, P. (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol.60, pp. 22-58.
38) McGillivray, M. & Clarke, M. (2006) Understanding human well-being, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
39) McMahon, D.M. (2006) Happiness: A History, New York, Atlantic Monthly.
40) Mirzaei, Hamed. & Azin, Bahreini. & Mehdi, Moeinaddini. & Zohreh, AsadiShekari. & Muhammad, Zaly Shah. & Zahid, Sultan. (2016) I dentify significant indicators for a happy city, planning malaysia journal, Vol.14, No.4, pp.263–272.
41) Montgomery, C. (2007) From living hell to living well, Globe and Mail.
42) Montgomery, C. (2013) Happy city: transforming our lives through urban design, Macmillan.
43) Mousavi, M. (2013) Happiness:Theoretical approach and experimental finding, Tehran: Tissa.
44) Nisbet, E. K. & Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. (2011) Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol.12, No.2, pp.303-322.
45) O’Brien, C. (2005) Planning for sustainable happiness: Harmonizing our internal and external landscapes, Paper prepared for the 2nd International Conference on Gross National Happiness, Nova Scotia, Canada.
46) OTT, Jan. (2005) Level and Inequality of Happiness in Nation: Does Greater Happiness of a Greater Number Imply Greater Inequality in Happiness?, Journal of Happiness Studies, No.6, pp.397–420.
47) Pascal, B. (1995) Pense´es (A.J. Krailsheimer, Trans.), London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1669).
48) Pringle, Sofie. & Guaralda, Mirko. & Mayere, Severine. (2019) Urban environment characteristics and their implications on emotional happiness and well-being: Proposal of a theoretical and conceptual framework. In Jackson, S & Muffatt, L (Eds.) Proceedings of the 12th Liveable Cities Conference. Association for Sustainability in Business Inc., Australia, pp. 33-66.
49) QIN, J. & ZHOU, X. & SUN, C. & LENG, H. & LIAN, Z. (2013) Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents', Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol.12, No.158, pp.490-497.
50) Rapoport, A. (2016) Human aspects of Urban:Towards a Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design (Urban and regional planning series), University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
51) Razzaghi-Asl, Sina. & Afrooz Rahimi, Ariaei. & Sama Barati, Ghahfarokhici. (2017) An investigation to the comparative impact assessment of urban facades on psychological attributes of residents in new and old housing areas; the case of Jolfa street in Isfahan, Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, Vol.10, No.3, pp.57-70.
52) Rhinehart, N. (2009) Public Spaces in Bogota: An Introduction, The University of Miami InterAmerican Law Review, Vol.40, No.2, pp.197-211.
53) Robb, B. R. & Berker, A. & Espenhahn, S. & Dayan, P. & Dolan, R. (2016) The social contingency of momentary subjective well-being, Nature Communications, Vol.7, No.11825, pp.1-8.
54) Rojas, M. (2011) Happiness, income, and beyond, Applied Research in Quality of Life, Vol.6, No.3, pp.265-276.
55) Samavati, S. & Ranjbar, E. (2017) The Effect of Physical Stimuli on Citizens’ Happiness in Urban Environments: The Case of the Pedestrian Area of the Historical Part of Tehran, Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health, Vol.2 pp.1-36.
56) Sepe, M. (2017) THE ROLE OF PUBLIC SPACE TO ACHIEVE URBAN HAPPINESS, Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, Vol.96, pp.364- 373
57) SERESINHE, C. I. & PREIS, T. & MACKERRON, G. & MOAT, H, S. (2019) Happiness is Greater in More Scenic Locations, Sci Rep, Vol. 9, pp.22-571.
58) SULLIVAN, W. (2014) Attention restoration and stress reduction: Two mechanisms underlying the health benefits of exposure to green spaces.
59) Sumner, L.W. (1999) Welfare, happiness, and ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.
60) Veenhoven, R. & Hagerty, M. (2006) Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin, Social Indicators Research, Vol.79, No.3, pp.421-436.
61) Veenhven, R. (2001) Are the Russians as unhappy as the saye they are? Comparability of self-reports across nations, Journal of happiness studies, Vol.2, pp. 111-136.
62) Zang Zarin, Shadi. & Niroomand, Morteza. & Heidari, Ali Akbar. (2014) Physical and Social Aspects of Vitality Case Study: Traditional Street and Modern Street in Tehran, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.170, pp.659–668.
Sustainable city
Volume 3, Issue 3
November 2020
Pages 115-132

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics