مجله شهر پایدار

مجله شهر پایدار

فراترکیب پیشران‌های اجتماعی تأثیرگذار در توسعه هاب‌های نوآوری و دانش‌بنیان شهری

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
حافظ مهدنژاد 1
احمد زنگانه 2
1 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه سیدجمال الدین اسدآبادی، اسدآباد، ایران
2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/jsc.2024.388160.1687
چکیده
پیشران‌های اجتماعی، زمینه را برای جذب نخبگان و تحقق‌پذیری شهر دانش‌بنیان به‌عنوان یکی از پارادایم‌های مهم شهر آینده فراهم می‌آورد. هدف پژوهش حاضر، سنتز ادبیات گسترده پیشران‌های اجتماعی تأثیرگذار در توسعه هاب‌های نوآوری و دانش‌بنیان شهری جهت ارایه مدل مفهومی یکپارچه و جامع آن است. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف توسعه‌ای و روش آن کیفی است. جامعه آماری شامل پژوهش‌های منتشره در بازه زمانی دهه 1990 تا سال 2022 به تعداد 1223 مأخذ است. ابتدا 892 منبع با بررسی عنوان و 156 منبع با بررسی چکیده حذف، سپس محتوای 175 منبع به‌طور کامل بررسی و تحلیل و 43 مقاله جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل نهایی انتخاب گردید. برای سنجش میزان پایایی از ضریب کاپای کوهن استفاده شد و نتایج آن معادل 733/0 با سطح معناداری 000/0 بوده که بیانگر پایایی مناسب پژوهش است. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش، پیشران‌های اجتماعی هاب‌های نوآوری و دانش‌بنیان شهری دارای پنج مقوله متمایز و درهم‌تنیده متشکل از حس مکانی، سرمایه اجتماع، یکپارچگی اجتماعی، رفاه اجتماعی و توسعه اجتماعی-فرهنگی می‌باشد. نوآوری و دانش‌بنیان شهری دارای 10 بعد (مشتمل بر احساس تعلق به اجتماع، ساختار اجتماعی، زیرساخت کارکنان دانش، رفاه، ساختار اجتماع، سرمایه انسانی اشتراک مبنا، شکل، تصویر، کارکرد و محیط) و 31 مؤلفه است. همچنین در مجموع، هاب‌های نوآوری و دانش‌بنیان شهری دارای 115 شاخص است. مقوله یکپارچگی اجتماعی، 24 درصد مجموع شاخص‌ها را در برمی‌گیرد. سایر مقوله‌ها متشکل از حس مکانی، سرمایه اجتماع، توسعه اجتماعی-فرهنگی و رفاه انسانی به ترتیب 33، 20 درصد، 12 درصد و 11 درصد مجموع شاخص‌ها را شامل می‌شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
هاب دانش
توسعه شهری دانش‌بنیان
مؤلفه‌های اجتماعی
نوآوری
فراترکیب
  1. Bathelt H., Feldman, M., & Kogler D.F. (2013). Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Innovation. 2st Edition, London: Routledge.
  2. Benna, Umar G. (2013). Timbuktu, the African Medieval Knowledge City: The Role of Knowledge Development Actors. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(3),1-19. doi:10.1142/S0219649213500263.
  3. Benneworth, Paul., & Ratinho, Tiago. (2014). Reframing the role of knowledge parks and science cities in knowledge-based urban development. Environment and Planning, 32(5), 784-808. doi.org/10.1068/c1266.
  4. Brown, J. (2015). Home from home? Locational choices of international creative class workers. European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2336-2355. doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.988012.
  5. Carrillo, Francisco. Javier. (2015). Knowledge-based development as a new economic culture. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(15), 1–17. doi:10.1186/s40852-015-0017-5.
  6. Carrillo, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Garcia, B., & Lonnqvist, A.­(2014). Knowledge and the City: Concepts, Applications and Trends of Knowledge-Based Urban Development. 1st Edition, New York: Routledge.
  7. Clifton, N., & Cooke, P. (2019). Creative knowledge workers and location in Europe and North America: a comparative review. Creative Industries Journal, 2(1), 73-89. doi:10.1386/cij.2.1.73/1.
  8. Carvalho, L., van Winden, W. (2017). Planned knowledge locations in cities: studying emergence and change. Knowledge-Based Development, 8(1),47-67. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2017.082429.
  9. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2016). Towards an urban quality framework: determining critical measures for different geographical scales to attract and retain talent in cities. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 7(3), 290- 312. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.078556.
  10. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Guaralda, M. (2020). How can an enhanced community engagement with innovation districts be established? Evidence from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. Cities, 96(1), 102430. doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102430.
  11. Edvardsson, I. R., Yigitcanlar, T., & Pancholi, S. (2016). Knowledge city research and practice under the microscope: a review of empirical findings. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14(4), 537-564. doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0003-0.
  12. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., Kamruzzaman, M. (2018a). Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane's knowledge precincts. Land Use Policy, 79(1), 734-747. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.016.
  13. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., & Kamruzzaman, M.D. (2018b). Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach. Land Use Policy, 76(1), 471-486. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.027.
  14. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2018). Place quality in innovation clusters: An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney. Cities, 74(1), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.017.
  15. Evers, H.D., Solvay, G., & Thomas, M. (2010). Knowledge Clusters and Knowledge Hubs: Designing Epistemic Landscapes for Development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(5), 678-689. doi:10.1108/13673271011074836.
  16. Fernandez-Maldonado, A. & Romein, A. (2010). The role of organisational capacity and knowledgebased development. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 1(1), 79-96. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2010.032587.
  17. Fikirkoca, A., & Saritas, O. (2012). Foresight for Science Parks: the Case of Ankara University. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(10), 1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.723688.
  18. Gabriele, R., D’Ambrosio, A., & Schiavone, F. (2017). Open Innovation and the Role of Hubs of Knowledge in a Regional Context. J ournal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(1), 1049–1065. DOI:10.1007/s13132-015-0331-y.
  19. Gonzalez, M., Alvarado, J., & Martinez, S. (2005). A compilation of resources on knowledge cities and knowledge-based development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 107-127. doi:10.1108/13673270410558819.
  20. Gonzalez, O., & Carrillo, F. (2012). Cities-benchmarking algorithm: a meta-ranking exercise. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 3(1), 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2012.047036.
  21. Hu, R. (2014). Migrant knowledge workers: An empirical study of global Sydney as a knowledge city. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(12), 5605-5613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.011.
  22.  Hu, R. (2016). Concentration and Mobility of Knowledge Workers: An Intercity Analysis of Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 11-28. doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1090190.
  23. Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553-553. doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407.
  24. Katz, B., & Wagner, J. (2014). The rise of innovation districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. 1st Edition, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  25. Kunzmann, K.R. (2009). The strategic dimensions of knowledge industries in urban development. DISP-The Planning Review, 45(1), 40-47. doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2009.10557034.
  26. Lachal, J., Revah-Levy, A., Orri, M., Rose Moro, M. (2017). Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. Front. Psychiatry, 8(1), 269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269.
  27. Lever, W. (2002). Correlating the knowledge-base of cities with economic growth. Urban Studies, 39(5-6), 859-870. doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128345.
  28. Link, A., & Scott, J. (2003). U.S. Science Parks: the Diffusion of an Innovation and its Effects on the Academic Missions of Universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(1), 1323–1356. doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00085-7.
  29. Kacar, S. M., & Onay, I. A. (2015). The Role of Urban Governance and Planning in Knowledge City Development: Case Study of Istanbul, Turkey. 10th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics: IFKAD-Culture, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Connecting the Knowledge Dots, Italy.
  30. Kacar, S. M., & Gezici, F. (2016). Knowledge-based urban development potential of Turkish provinces. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development (IJKBD(, 7(2), 160-183. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2016.076465.
  31. Lopez-Ruiz, V.R., Alfaro-Navarro, J.L., & Nevado-Pena, D. (2019)­. Knowledge-city index construction: An intellectual capital perspective. Expert systems with applications, 41(12), 5560-5572. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.007.
  32. Mieg, H. A. (2022). Social Innovation in Sustainable Urban Development. Sustainability. 14(1), 5414. doi:10.3390/su14095414.
  33. Noah, P. D. (2017). A systematic approach to the Qualitative Meta-synthesis. Issues in Information Systems, 18(2),196-205. doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2017_196-205.
  34. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T. & Guaralda, M. (2015a). Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 6(3), 215-240. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823.
  35. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M. (2015b). Public space design of knowledge and innovation spaces: learnings from Kelvin Grove Urban Village, Brisbane. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(13), 131-17. doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0015-7.
  36. Pancholi, S., Guaralda, M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017a). Context, contribution and characteristics of public spaces for place making in contemporary knowledge and innovation spaces: Observations from Brisbane, Australia. The Journal of Public Space, 2(4), 91-102. doi:10.5204/jps.v2i4.143.
  37. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T. & Guaralda, M. (2017b). Governance that matters, J. Place Management and Development, 10(1), 73-87. B2n.ir/w45437.
  38. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2019). Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146(1),616-625. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014.
  39. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2018a). Societal integration that matters: Place making experience of Macquarie Park Innovation District, Sydney. City, Culture and Society, 13(1), 13-21. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.004.
  40. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2018b). Attributes of successful place-making in knowledge and innovation spaces: evidence from Brisbane's Diamantina knowledge precinct. Journal of Urban Design, 23(5), 693-711. doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1454259.
  41. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., Mayere, S., Caldwell, G. A., & Medland, R.­(2020). University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: insights from Australian cities. Land use policy, 99(1), 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105109.
  42. Penco, L. (2015). The development of the successful city in the knowledge economy: toward the dual role of consumer hub and knowledge hub. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(4),818–837. doi: 10.1007/s13132-013-0149-4.
  43. Peter, C.­(2021). Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Developmental Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Economic Ecosystems and the Entrepreneurial State. Sustainability, 13(1), 1-19. doi.org/10.3390/su13137360.
  44. Robaczewska, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Lorenz, A. (2019). Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 1(1), 120-131. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2019.05.001.
  45. Sampangi, R. V., Ritter, W., Vighnesh, N.V. & Ashish Ray, H.C. (2012). The knowledge city index: a case study of Mysore. nternational Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based, 3(2),193–212. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2012.047034.
  46. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. 1st Edition, Cambridg: Harvard University Press.
  47. Scott, A. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 1 –24. doi:10.1007/s11187-004-6493-9.
  48. Schnurbein, G., Potluka, O., & Mayer, A. (2021). Creating social innovation in urban development through collaborative processes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1910800.
  49. Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2018). The R&D knowledge base in city-agglomerations and knowledge searching in product innovative SMEs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1(1),1-18. doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1545053.
  50. Tuli, S. C., Hu, R., Dare, L. (2019). Planning a global knowledge city: experience from Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 1(1), 1-17. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2019.098228.
  51. Van Winden, W., Carvalho, L., Van Tuijl, E., Van Haaren, J. & Van Berg, D. (2013). Creating knowledge locations in cities: Innovation and Integration Challenges. 1st Edition, London: Routledge.
  52. Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K. & Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities, 25(1), 63-72. doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.01.001.
  53. Yigitcanlar, T. (2011). Position paper: redefining knowledge-based urban development. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 2(4), 340-356. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2011.044343.
  54. Yigitcanlar, T. & Dur, F. (2013). Making space and place for knowledge communities. Australasian J. Regional Studies, 19(1), 36-63. B2n.ir/k50416.
  55. Yigitcanlar, T., & Lonnqvist, A. ­(2013). Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: results from the international comparison of Helsinki. Cities, 31(1), 357-369. doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.005.
  56. Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). Innovating urban policymaking and planning mechanisms to deliver knowledge-based agendas: a methodological approach. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 5(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2014.065300.
  57. Yigitcanlar, T., & Bulu, M. (2015). Dubaization of Istanbul: Insights From the Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Environment and Planning, 47(1),89-107. doi:10.1068/a130209p.
  58. Yigitcanlar, T,. & Bulu, M. (2016). Urban Knowledge and Innovation Spaces. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 1-9. doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1164443.
  59. Yigitcanlar, T., Adu McVie, R. S., & Erol, I. (2020). How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature. Land Use Policy, 95(1), 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595.
  60. Zhang, J‑X.,Cheng, J.W., Philbin, S. P., Ballesteros‑Perez, P., Skitmore, M., & Wang, G. (2022). Infuencing factors of urban innovation and development: a grounded theory analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1(1), 1-26. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02151-7.
  61. Zhao, P.­­­(2020). Building knowledge city in transformation era: Knowledge‐based urban development in Beijing in the context of globalisation and decentralisation. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51(1), 73-90. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01415.x.
مجله شهر پایدار
دوره 7، شماره 3
پاییز 1403
صفحه 77-97