Sustainable city

Sustainable city

Investigation of Innovative Solutions to Enhance the Efficiency of Bicycle-Oriented Infrastructure: A case study of Sahad Smart Bicycle Sharing System in Urmia City

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Planning and Art, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
The rapid growth of private automobile use in the city of Urmia has generated a range of urban challenges, including deteriorating air quality, rising fossil fuel consumption, and a decline in social interaction within public spaces. One widely acknowledged strategy for mitigating these challenges is the expansion of non-motorized transportation systems, particularly urban cycling. This study aims to examine the factors influencing the operational efficiency of the SAHAD project (an intelligent bicycle-sharing system) and to propose evidence-based strategies for enhancing its performance. In the first phase of the analysis, differences in the perceived importance of cycling facilities between women and men, as well as the relationship between accident-related concerns and the frequency of bicycle commuting, were examined using statistical tests in SPSS. In the second phase, spatial configuration indicators of the project area were assessed using DepthmapX software to identify urban corridors with the highest potential for the development of cycling infrastructure. The findings indicate no statistically significant gender differences in the perceived importance of cycling facilities; however, women demonstrate greater sensitivity to route quality and safety. Moreover, a negative association was identified between accident-related concerns and bicycle use, whereby higher levels of perceived risk correspond to a reduced propensity for cycling. Spatial configuration analysis further reveals that several urban corridors, most notably Kashani, Shahid Beheshti, and Shahid Soleimani, exhibit strong potential for the expansion of cycling routes. Accordingly, three additional corridors were incorporated into the project’s operational area to enhance the spatial continuity of the bicycle-sharing network. Overall, the findings offer practical insights for optimizing cycling-oriented infrastructure and improving the effectiveness of bicycle-sharing initiatives in cities with comparable urban and socio-spatial characteristics.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The rapid pace of urbanization over recent decades has generated substantial development opportunities while simultaneously imposing significant social, economic, and environmental pressures on cities. Patterns of dispersed urban development have intensified dependence on private automobiles, resulting in traffic congestion, longer daily travel times, inefficient land use, the conversion of agricultural land and green spaces, and increased emissions of air pollutants. Under these conditions, transit-oriented development (TOD) has emerged as one of the most widely endorsed and sustainable approaches for addressing contemporary urban transportation challenges. A core pillar of this approach is the promotion of sustainable modes of mobility, particularly walking and cycling.
Cycling, as an efficient alternative to private automobiles for short-distance urban trips, has long been institutionalized in many developed countries, where it plays a critical role in reducing environmental pollution, improving public health, and enhancing overall urban quality of life. Within this context, the Urmia Traffic and Transportation Organization launched the Intelligent Bicycle-Sharing System (SAHAD) in July 2016, guided by a vision of creating a green and clean city supported by modern technologies. The project was designed to reduce traffic congestion, improve environmental conditions, and promote public health; however, after several years of implementation, a substantial share of its anticipated objectives remains unrealized, and the system has yet to achieve an optimal level of operational efficiency.

Methodology
The methodological framework of this study comprises two main components: social data analysis and spatial configuration analysis of the urban street network. In the first phase, a structured questionnaire was administered to residents of Urmia to assess the perceived importance of cycling facilities, gender-based perceptions, and the relationship between accident-related concerns and the level of bicycle use. Following questionnaire design, its internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, and the collected data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests in SPSS.
The statistical population corresponded to the total population of Urmia, and, considering the constraints of the study, the sample size was determined as 384 respondents using Cochran’s formula. In addition, 20 experts in urban planning and traffic engineering were purposively selected and surveyed through a separate questionnaire to complement the general survey data.
In the second phase, to identify streets with the potential for cycling route development, the urban street network was first digitized in AutoCAD and subsequently transferred to DepthmapX for spatial configuration analysis. Key spatial indicators, including depth, connectivity, integration, and choice, were evaluated as primary measures of movement potential and accessibility to determine the suitability of urban corridors for the implementation of dedicated cycling infrastructure.

Result and Discussion
The initial analysis of the public survey data indicates that women constituted the majority of respondents (53.1%), while individuals aged 19–30 years represented the dominant age group, accounting for 72.6% of the sample. Analysis of accessibility-related subcomponents revealed that access to everyday land uses, such as residential areas, schools, retail facilities, and workplaces, was rated as the most important factor (82%), whereas the role of cycling routes in connecting different parts of the city received the lowest importance rating (36.4%). This finding suggests that users prioritize practical functionality and direct access in their daily activities over the broader network connectivity of cycling routes.
Within the urban design and streetscape component, route maintenance quality was rated as the most important factor (76%), whereas the visual attractiveness of surrounding landscapes received the lowest importance score. This indicates that, for users in Urmia, the physical condition of cycling routes outweighs aesthetic considerations. Similarly, within the safety and security dimension, adequate route lighting emerged as the most important subcomponent (82.2%), while the presence of traffic-calming measures was assigned the lowest priority. Collectively, these findings indicate that users, particularly women, regard the physical quality and safety of cycling routes as the primary determinants of their willingness to engage in cycling.
Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant negative relationship between accident-related concerns and the level of bicycle use (r = −0.297, Sig = 0.021), indicating that heightened perceptions of traffic-related insecurity constitute one of the most substantial barriers to the wider adoption of cycling in Urmia. By contrast, statistical tests comparing women and men in terms of the importance attributed to cycling facilities revealed no significant difference between the two groups (Sig = 0.244). Nevertheless, mean scores suggest that women exhibit greater sensitivity to route quality and safety.
According to expert assessments, infrastructural deficiencies were identified as the most influential factor limiting public uptake of the project (60%), whereas economic constraints faced by responsible institutions were considered the least influential (20%). These findings underscore weaknesses in the physical infrastructure and the lack of network continuity as the primary drivers of the project’s limited effectiveness. Experts further identified the Shahrchai and Shahid Beheshti corridors as the most suitable candidates for the development of dedicated cycling routes. This assessment is consistent with the study’s spatial analyses, which indicate that these corridors exhibit high levels of integration, connectivity, and choice, highlighting their strong potential for transformation into standard cycling corridors.

Conclusion
This study was conducted to identify the underlying reasons for the limited success of the SAHAD project and to examine both public expectations and expert-defined requirements. The findings indicate that infrastructural deficiencies, insufficient coordination among responsible institutions, and limited consideration of user needs constitute the primary factors contributing to the project’s underperformance. Drawing on the statistical and spatial analyses, a set of practical strategies was proposed to enhance system efficiency, with particular emphasis on improving route quality, strengthening safety conditions, establishing a continuous and well-connected network, and incorporating gender-sensitive considerations.
Although these strategies were formulated in response to the specific urban context of Urmia, they also demonstrate applicability to cities with comparable socio-spatial characteristics. To improve project performance, measures such as the implementation of standard cycling infrastructure, enhanced lighting and surveillance, traffic calming along high-volume corridors, public education and awareness-raising initiatives, improved inter-institutional coordination, and continuous performance monitoring are recommended. The implementation of these measures has the potential to increase public uptake, particularly among women and children, and to strengthen the role of cycling within the urban transportation system.
Overall, the systematic development of bicycle-sharing systems can contribute not only to reductions in traffic congestion and environmental pollution but also to the realization of sustainable and smart cities. In this regard, the present study offers valuable guidance for the planning and implementation of similar initiatives in other urban contexts.

Funding
There is no funding support.

Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

  1. Aashto. (2012). Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. 4th Edition, 2012. www.transportation.org
  2.   Abedini, A., Sobat-Sani, N., & Golshani, M. (2019). An analysis of the impact of physical changes on the spatial structure of the historical area of Urmia using Space Syntax and GIS. Human Geography Research, 51(1), 79–96. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20086296.1398.51.1.6.6 [In Persian].
  3. Askari, M., & Rahimi, M. (2014). Examining the level of social acceptance of bicycle use in metropolitan areas (Case study: Tehran metropolis). Applied Sociology, 28(1), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2017.21253 [In Persian].
  4. Bachand-Marleau, J., Lee, B., & El-Geneidy, A. (2012). Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use. Transportation Research Record, 2314, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2314-09
  5. Bike Sharing World Map. (n.d.). Global bike-sharing systems. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://bikesharingworldmap.com/index.php#/all/2.6/0/51.5/
  6. Eluru, N., Bhat, C. R., & Hensher, D. A. (2008). A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(3), 1033–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.010
  7. Festus, I. A., Omoboye, I. F., & Andrew, O. B. (2020). Urban Sprawl: Environmental Consequence of Rapid Urban Expansion. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(6), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i6.411
  8. Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014a). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013
  9. Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014b). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013
  10. Galychyn, O., & Üstundağ, K. (2017). Organic Urbanism: Human-oriented Design for Metropolises. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.005
  11. Garde, A. (2020). New urbanism: Past, present, and future. Urban Planning, 5(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/UP.V5I4.3478
  12. Haji Mohammad Hasan, M. (2011). Evaluating the integration of public transport and cycling in Tehran. (Master’s thesis, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran).
  13. Hassanpour, A., & Bigazzi, A. (2023). What is on the Bicycle Paths? A Detailed Vehicle Taxonomy with Mode Share Data for Off-Street Paths in Metropolitan Vancouver, Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2677(11), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231165017
  14. Hosseinpour, H., Kazemi, A., & Saqafi-Asl, A. (2023). Evaluating the impact of permeability components on improving quality in public open spaces using space arrangement method (Case study: Bagherabad neighborhood, Rasht). Journal of Human Settlements Studies and Planning, 18(3), 81–92. Dor: 20.1001.1.25385968.1402.18.3.7.8 [In Persian].
  15. Kosmidis, I., & Müller-Eie, D. (2023). The synergy of bicycles and public transport: a systematic literature review. Transport Reviews, 44(1), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2222911
  16. Mehr News Agency. (2022, December 6). Urmia air quality is unhealthy: 70% of pollution caused by vehicle traffic. Mehr News Agency. https://www.mehrnews.com/amp/5655521 [In Persian].
  17. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, Transportation Deputy. (2020). Urban street design regulations, Section 11: Bicycle paths. Tehran: Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. [In Persian].
  18. Mohammady, S., & Delavar, M. R. (2015). Urban Sprawl Monitoring. Modern Applied Science, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n8p1
  19. Monazzam, M. R., Karimi, E., Shahbazi, H., & Shahidzadeh, H. (2021). Effect of cycling development as a non-motorized transport on reducing air and noise pollution-case study: Central districts of Tehran. Urban Climate, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100887
  20. Motieian, H., Saedi-Masgari, M., & Aslani, M. (2019). Developing transit-oriented development indicators in urban areas through spatial analysis and fuzzy inference system. Journal of Spatial Information Technology Engineering, 7(1), 37–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jgit.7.1.37 [In Persian].
  21. Office of Energy, Industry, and Mining Studies (Energy Group). Center for Research and Studies of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (2024). Diagnosis of the energy optimization and environmental market and proposing solutions. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. https://doi.org/10.22034/report.2024.16811.1729 [In Persian].
  22. Ploeger, J., & Oldenziel, R. (2022). Bicycle-Oriented Development: How the Dutch Railroad Shaped Urban Planning and Discovered Cyclists along the Way, 1960-1990. Journal of Urban History. https://doi.org/10.1177/00961442221133080
  23. Schneider, F., Jensen, A. F., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2023). Empirical analysis of cycling distances in three of Europe’s most bicycle-friendly regions within an accessibility framework. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(7), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2095945
  24. Shabaanpour, Z., & Zare, S. (2000). Factors influencing citizens’ use of bicycles as a transport mode (Case study: Rasht city). Journal of Human Settlements Studies and Planning, 14(1), 259–273. [In Persian].
  25. Stojanovski, T. (2020). Urban design and public transportation–public spaces, visual proximity and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1592665
  26. Yen, B. T. H., Mulley, C., Chen, M. Y. J., & Chiou, Y. C. (2024). How transit-oriented development concepts and strategies influenced green transport systems: A meta-analysis approach. Asian Transport Studies, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100136
  27. Yıldırım, Ö. C., & Çelik, E. (2023). Understanding pedestrian behavior and spatial relations: A pedestrianized area in Besiktas, Istanbul. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.06.009
  28. Zhang, M., & Lee, J. (2023). Make TOD More Bicycling-Friendly: An Extended Node-Place Model Incorporating a Cycling Accessibility Index. Buildings, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051240