Sustainable city

Sustainable city

Analyzing the Indicators of Sustainability in Neighborhoods with Emphasis on the Residents' Point of View: A case study of Etemadiye Neighborhood in Zanjan

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty Social Sciences, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran
2 Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2025.481415.1810
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
Today, paying attention to neighborhood sustainability indicators represents a significant trend in the social environment, economy, human well-being, and quality of life that has attracted the attention of urban managers and planners. Therefore, the main goal of the present study is to analyze the sustainability indicators of Etemadiyeh neighborhood in Zanjan. The study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of type and nature. Information and data were collected through library and field methods. The statistical population of the study was 6872 people, of which 370 residents of the neighborhood were selected as a sample. The findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's test, and one-sample t-test using SPSS 26 and Minitab software. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire. The overall alpha value was above 0.96, which is a high value. The results of the Pearson test for seven neighborhood sustainability indicators, including physical, social, economic, environmental, communication, service, and political indicators, showed that, at a significant level (sig=0.000), the sustainability indicators and the stability of the Etemadieh neighborhood are correlated with each other by (r=0.928), (r=0.819), (r=0.932), (r=0.900), (r=0.904), (r=0.896), and (r=0.879), respectively; and the type of correlation between the seven indicators and neighborhood sustainability was direct, and the results of the t-test showed that the P-value obtained for all indicators (0.000) is smaller than the significance level of 0.05; therefore, with 95% confidence, it can be concluded that from the perspective of the residents of the Etemadieh neighborhood, this neighborhood is sustainable in the indicators under study.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
One of the most important parts of cities is neighborhoods, which can play an important role in the development of cities in all parts of the world, especially in Iran. Currently, many experts and planners of urban management have realized the important role of neighborhoods and are trying to realize not only the development of neighborhoods but also cities through the channel of neighborhoods. It is worth noting that sustainability goals are the most important principle of any planning, and people are the most important beneficiaries of these plans. Therefore, in the present research, we decided to address the main hypothesis of the research, which is the analysis of the sustainability indicators of the neighborhood of Etemadieh, Zanjan, according to the views of the residents of this place. The neighborhood residents' point of view is one of the most accurate and best forms of research that has been noticed in recent years. Since every planning and every sustainable action is for the well-being and security of the neighborhood residents, one of the most valuable aspects of neighborhood assessment in terms of sustainability is to achieve the view of the people living in the neighborhood.
 
Methodology
The current study employs an applied research approach and utilizes a descriptive-analytical research method. We employed library and field methods to gather information and data, including interviews and researcher-designed questionnaires. The study's statistical population consists of residents from the Etemadieh neighborhood in Zanjan city, with a sample size of 370 individuals. SPSS 26, Minitab software, and Pearson and T-test statistical tests were used to analyze the findings.
 
Results and discussion
The results of descriptive statistics showed that out of the total population of 370 people studied, 116 were women and 254 were men; the highest frequency and percentage belonged to the age group of 31 to 40 years, and the lowest frequency and percentage belonged to the age groups above 50 years (without participation and the age group was less than 20 years with 24 people. The majority of the community has a master's education, with 115 people and 139 people living in the place for 10 to 20 years. Government jobs, with 116 people, and unemployed people, with 116 people, make up the most people in society. Examining the level of information of the respondents about the research problem showed that the knowledge and information of the respondents in 2 items are in the medium and high range, and the highest frequency belongs to the medium and high range.
The results of the Pearson test for 7 indicators of neighborhood stability, including physical, social, economic, environmental, communication, service, and political indicators, showed that, at a significant level (sig = 0.000), the indicators of stability and sustainability of Etemadieh neighborhood (r=0.928), (r=0.819), (r=0.932), (r=0.900), (r=0.904), (r=0.896) and (r = 0.879) have a relationship with each other. It can be analyzed that the intensity of correlation between seven variables and neighborhood stability is equal to 0.928, 0.819, 0.932, 0.900, 0.904, 0.896, and 0.879, as well as the type of correlation between the mentioned seven variables. The stability of the neighborhood was of a direct (positive) type. Because the calculated significance level is less than the alpha of the research (P<0.05), it indicates the significance of the relationship between the variables. With 95% confidence, it can be said that there is a relationship between physical, social, economic, environmental, communication, and service. There is a significant relationship between politics and the level of stability of the neighborhood of Etemadieh; this variable can have an effect on achieving the results of the level of stability of the neighborhood from the perspective of the residents. The t-test results showed a sample because the P-value obtained for all indicators (0.000) is smaller than the significance level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded with 95% confidence that from the perspective of the residents of Etemadieh neighborhood, this neighborhood has stability in the investigated indicators.
 
Conclusion
The results of the Pearson test for 7 indicators of neighborhood stability, including physical, social, economic, environmental, communication, service, and political indicators, showed that, at a significant level (sig = 0.000), the indicators of stability and stability of the neighborhood of Etemadieh in the order of (r=0.928), (r=0.819), (r=0.932), (r=0.900), (r=0.904), (r=0.896) and (r=0.879) are related; the type of correlation between the 7 indicators and neighborhood stability is direct, and the results of the t-test showed that the P-value obtained for all indicators (0.000) is smaller than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, with 95% confidence, we can conclude that from the perspective of the residents of Etemadieh neighborhood, this neighborhood has stability in the investigated indicators.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 All colleagues have participated in this research work, and we would like to express our gratitude to the four authors of the article. No organization or body has provided financial support or assistance in any other fields.
Keywords

  1. Al-Ansari, M., & AlKhaled, S. (2023). Sustainable urban forms in the Arabian Gulf: an evidence-based analysis of Kuwaiti social housing neighborhoods at Jaber Al-Ahmed City. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1154523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1154523.
  2. Al-Hagla, K. (2008). Towards a sustainable neighborhood: The role of open spaces. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2(2), 162-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v2i2.239.
  3. Asghari, A., Ebrahimi Asl, H., Maleki Gavgani, A., & Sattari Sarbanqoli, H. (2021). Evaluating a sustainable urban neighborhood with zero-energy buildings in the Valiasr neighborhood of Tabriz. Journal of Sustainable City, 4(2), 91-106. http://dor.net/dor/20.1001.1.24766631.1400.4.2.5.9 [in Persian]
  4. Berk, M. G. (2005). The concept of neighbourhood in contemporary residential environments: An investigation of occupants' perception. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46446748_The_Concept_of_Neighbourhood_in_Contemporary_Residential_Environments_An_Investigation_of_Occupants%27_Perception.
  5. Brooks, C., Waterton, E., Saul, H., & Renzaho, A. (2023). Exploring the relationships between heritage tourism, sustainable community development and host communities’ health and wellbeing: A systematic review. PLoS One, 18(3), e0282319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282319.
  6. Chookah, N. A., Mushtaha, E., Alsyouf, I., & Alkhalidi, A. (2021). Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment: Evaluating Residential Sustainability in Sharjah City's Old Neighborhoods Using the UN-Habitat's Sustainable Neighborhood Principles. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(4), 1206-1216. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090422.
  7. Dehghanmongabadi, A., Hoşkara, Ş. Ö, & Shirkhanloo, N. (2014). Introduction to Achieve Sustainable Neighborhoods. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 3(9), 16-26.
  8. Elgadi, A. A., & Ismail, L. H. (2016). A review of sustainable neighborhood indicator for urban development in Libya. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(4), 2606-2613.
  9. Fu, J. (2023). Values of the New Urbanist Neighborhood Planning Based on the Concept of Sustainabilit. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning, Clausius Scientific Press (ISSN 2616-3969 Vol. 5 Nu), pp: 39-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2023.050505.
  10. Goodarzi, M. (2023). Factors affecting the realization of a learning city in the metropolis of Ahvaz. Journal of Sustainable City, 7 (3), 17-38. http://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2024.458976.1779.
  11. Hatami-Gharibvand, Z., & Adibi, Zh. (2022). Examining sustainable neighborhood development indicators in Tehran’s District 3: A case study of Zargandeh neighborhood. Environmental Science and Geography Knowledge Quarterly, 5(2), 1-15. http://noo.rs/zIqsZ [in Persian]
  12. Hoseinpour, M., & Sozandehfar, S. A. H. (2017). Examining and measuring the sustainability of new and old urban neighborhoods in physical dimensions in line with the sustainable neighborhood model: A case study of Balakaft and Niayesh neighborhoods. 7th International Conference on Sustainable Development and Urban Development, Shiraz University, Shiraz. [in Persian].
  13. Jomehpour, M., & Rouhani Choulaei, E. (2020). Measuring the sustainability level of organic and planned neighborhoods using UN-Habitat indicators: A case study of Noghan and Sajjad neighborhoods in Mashhad. Urban and Regional Development Planning Quarterly (Scientific), 5(12), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.55894.1256 [in Persian]
  14. Khosravi, B. (2024). Barriers to social housing policy in Iran. Sustainable City Journal, 7(2), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.32034jsc.2024.463021.1788 [in Persian]
  15. Lotteau, M., Yepez-Salmon, G., & Salmon, N. (2015). Environmental assessment of sustainable neighborhood projects through NEST, a decision support tool for early stage urban planning. Procedia Engineering, 115, 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.356.
  16. Lotfi Bazazan, S., Saremi, H. R., & Baghdadi, A. (2023). Identifying driving factors in housing planning foresight: A case study of Tehran. Sustainable City Journal, 6(4), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2023.403067.1713 [in Persian].
  17. Medved, P. (2014). The Structural Model of Autonomous Sustainable Neighbourhoods: New (Social) Basis for Sustainable Urban Planning. 17th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production, Portorož, Slovenia, 14-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308698778_The_structural_model_of_Autonomous_Sustainable_Neighbourhoods_-_new_social_basis_for_sustainable_urban_planning.
  18. Mirzabeigi, F., Mojtabizadeh Khanaqahi, H., & Sarvar, R. (2022). Measuring development indicators in the sustainability of urban areas: A case study of Ilam city. Journal of Sustainable City, 5(1), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.22034/JSC.2021.263247.138 [in Persian].
  19. Mimandi Parizi, S. (2015). Comparative study of sustainability levels in old and new urban neighborhoods: A case study of old and new neighborhoods of Kerman. Environmental Planning Quarterly, 39, 77-104. [in Persian].
  20. Meter, K. (1999). Neighborhood sustainability indicators guidebook: How to create neighborhood sustainability indicators in your neighborhood. Produced for the Urban Ecology Coalition (Minneapolis by Crossroads Resource Center). https://www.crcworks.org/guide.pdf.
  21. Mohammadi, J., Mohammadi, A., Ghafari, A., & Yazdani, M. H. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of the city from. Human Geography Research, 53(2), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.287972.1008000.
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2020), Cities policy responses. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/05/cities-policy-responses_f2028ff4/fd1053ff-en.pdf.
  23. Phillips, R. (2013). Neighborhood Sustainability: A Case Study of Redevelopment in Bristol Place. MUP Capstone.
  24. Kallus, R., & Law-Yone, H. (2000). What is a neighbourhood? The structure and function of an idea. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(6), 815-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b2636.
  25. Karimi, N., Habib, F., & Etesam, I. (2021). The Role of Urban Space Signs in Promoting Place Attachment Case Study: Zanjan Neighborhoods. Journal of Sustainable city, 4(2), 57-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2021.269967.1401. [in Persian].
  26. Khatibi, M., Khaidzir, K. A. M., & Mahdzar, S. S. S. (2023). Measuring the sustainability of neighborhoods: A systematic literature review. Iscience. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.105951.
  27. Shareef, S., & Altan, H. (2021). Sustainability at an Urban Level: A Case Study of a Neighborhood in Dubai, UAE. Sustainability, 13(8), 4355. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13084355.
  28. Slingerland, G., Nikolic, I., & Brazier, F. (2023). It's in the social network: The Social Neighbourhood model to unravel local social structures for liveable and safe neighbourhoods. Cities, 135, 104215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104215.
  29. Sharifi, A., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of The Total Environment, 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391.
  30. Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). Population. Statistical Yearbook of Zanjan Province. https://amar.org.ir/salnameh-amari [in Persian].
  31. Shafieian Daryani, F., Pourjafar, M. R., & Ghobadi, A. (2014). The concept of durability in Islamic architecture and its comparison with the concept of sustainability in contemporary architecture. Islamic Architecture Research Quarterly, 2(5), 32-50. [in Persian]
  32. Sayyami, G., Baqerzadeh, F., & Sepahi, A. (2015). Sustainable urban neighborhoods: A new model in reconstructing the concept of “neighborhood” in Iran: A case study of Ordām neighborhood in District 10 of Mashhad Municipality. Journal of Geography and Urban Development, 2(3), 39-53. [in Persian].
  33. Salehi, H., Shokri Pourdizji, H., & Najafi, S. (2018). Analyzing the resilience of urban settlements against earthquakes: A case study of Bisim and Etemadiyeh neighborhoods in Zanjan. 1st National Conference on Competitiveness and Future Urban Developments, Iranian Society of Geography and Urban Planning, Tehran, June 18, 2018. [in Persian]
  34. Umdu, D. Ç., & Alakvuk, E. (2022). Sustainable communities, neighborhoods, cities and their criteria. The European Journal of Research and Development, 2(2), 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v2i2.66.
  35. Ghadami, M. J., & Zeinalzadeh, S. (2015). The Role of Neighborhoods’ Centers in the Development of Urban Sustainability (Case Study: Mahmudabad Neighborhoods, Mazandaran, Iran). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 5(4), 67-78.
  36. Jozsa, A., & Brown, D. (2005). Neighborhood sustainability indicators report on a best practice workshop. School of Urban Planning, McGill University and the Urban Ecology Centre, 1-20.
  37. Hagen, B., Nassar, C., & Pijawka, D. (2017). The social dimension of sustainable neighborhood design: comparing two neighborhoods in Freiburg, Germany. Urban Planning, 2(4), 64-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i4.1035.
  38. Zhang, Q., Yung, E., & Chan, E. (2018). Towards sustainable neighborhoods: challenges and opportunities for neighborhood planning in transitional urban China. Sustainability, 10(2), 406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10020406.