Sustainable city

Sustainable city

The Approach of Right to the City in Child-Friendly Neighborhoods: the case study of Khajeh Nezamolmolk Neighborhood in Tehran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2024.429186.1750
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the neighborhood of Khajehnezamolmolk in Tehran in terms of the indicators of a child-friendly neighborhood viewed from a right-to-the-city approach. The objective data of the 22 studied indicators are provided from documentary sources. Also, the data of the 31 subjective indicators was obtained from sample people of 373 parents of children living in the studied neighborhood. They are selected randomly from the households who reside here. The questionnaire contains 31 items to evaluate the 31 indicators. After comparing the subject data with the standard criteria, the data were graded in the range of 1-5 so that all the indicators were on a single scale. A one-sample t-test model is implemented in SPSS software to analyze the data. Findings showed that the overall condition of the studied neighborhood is lower than the average level (score 3). The score of 2.17 indicates the weakest situation for the indicators of the institutional-legal dimension. The scores of physical-environmental and social-cultural aspects are 2.28 and 2.8, respectively. The weakest indicators are per capita of green spaces, cultural, and sports land use, and the indicators of parents' education level, encouragement to observe cultural events, the possibility of providing children needs for goods and services in the neighborhood, and accessibility and quality of kindergartens and elementary schools. Enhancing the neighborhood to approach the standards of a child-friendly neighborhood requires a strategic program in the direction of sustainable cultural regeneration.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
According to the definition of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), a child is someone with an age lower than 18 years. Cities can be exciting and lively environments for childhood. However, certain risks and challenges, such as noise and air pollution, a sedentary lifestyle, traffic hazards, crime, social isolation, etc., may endanger children's health and healthy growth. The idea of child-friendly neighborhoods is formed in line with the idea of children's right to a city and the need for the neighborhoods to satisfy children's needs and their right to participate in the affairs. The idea of a child-friendly city was officially proposed in 2004 by the United Nations Children's Fund. It stipulated that an effective local management system committed to implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child should be established. Children's right to the city not only refers to children's access to urban services such as schools, health-treatment centers, playgrounds, libraries, museums, and transportation, but it also indicates children's ability to participate in decision-making. This article aims to evaluate one of the old neighborhoods of Tehran in terms of the degree of compliance with the criteria of a child-friendly neighborhood in line with the approach of the children's rights to the city.
 
Methodology
Two data sets are used in this research. The first was extracted from statistical documents and research reports or received from Tehran Municipality. The second is survey data. They were obtained from a sample of 373 household heads with at least one child living in the study area. The questionnaire contains 31 questions to evaluate 31 indicators. The respondent's evaluations were done based on a five-point Likert scale. Then, the evaluations were quantified from 1 to 5 and entered into the SPSS software. Implying the One Sample T-Test model, each index's mean of evaluation scores was calculated. Each statistical figure of the data from each index of the first data set was also matched with scores in the 1-5 according to the standard figures of the index so that both data sets had the same scale. Descriptive statistics parameters were used to rank and analyze the data. The study area is Khajeh Nezamolmolk neighborhood. It is located in District 7 of Tehran Municipality and has an area of 84.5 hectares and a population of 34,031.
 
Results and discussion
The mean of all the indicators is 2.55, below the average (3). This suggests that the neighborhood, in general, lacks characteristics of a child-friendly neighborhood. The mean of the institutional-legal dimension indicators, which is 2.17, indicates a poor condition. Also, the mean of the indicators of the physical-environmental dimension is 2.28, which indicates a poor situation. The mean score of 2.8 for socio-cultural indicators shows an average situation. 5 indicators out of a total of 41 indicators show a very poor situation, of which 4 indicators are of the physical dimension (adequate green and per capita and use of space, culture, sports, and parks). One indicator is from the institutional-legal dimension, and it is a monitoring system that ensures safety and evaluates the health of the environment for children continuously). No indicator had a mean higher than 4.5. In other words, none of the indicators shows a good situation. Only two indicators, including parents' education level and encouragement to observe cultural events, show a relatively good situation. The weakest dimension in terms of the neighborhood's child-friendly criteria is the institutional-legal dimension. Not only at the local level but also at the national level, there are no rules and regulations that directly relate to the child's rights about the living environment, especially the physical environment.
 
Conclusion
The neighborhoods in the central part of large cities like Tehran, including the studied neighborhood in Tehran, have experienced rapid population growth and spatial extension in recent decades. They have rapidly created and expanded new constructions around their cores, all of which have become physically deficient. So, they cannot respond to today's children's needs, the environment necessary for sociability, learning, intellectual growth, and a safe and healthy space for life and peace. Most of the fabric is worn-out, most buildings are old and cannot be improved, most roads are incompatible with today's urban transportation needs, and the parcels of land are mostly tiny. The scarcity of vacant land or the land that can be acquired has compensated facilities and services. Transforming the studied neighborhood towards a child-friendly neighborhood requires a strategic plan to be prepared and implemented in line with sustainable cultural regeneration. Laws must approve it and oblige city managers to develop neighborhoods in line with child-friendly criteria, such as land acquisition for developing facilities and services.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

  1. Abhari, N., Shamsuddini, A., & Ezzatpanah, B. (2021). Assessing the status of child-friendly city indicators and its relationship with children's access to essential uses (case study: Jahrom city). Urban Planning Geography Research, 9(3), 856-835. DOI: 10.22059/JURBANGEO.2021.320202.1472 [in Persian]
  2. Aerts, J. (2018). Shaping urbanization for children: a handbook on child-responsive urban planning, New York, UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/media/47616/file/UNICEF_Shaping_urbanization_for_children_handbook_2018.pdf
  3. Arup. (2017). Cities alive: Designing for urban childhoods. London: Arup. Retrieved from urbanchildhoods@arup.com
  4. Bishop, K., & Corkery, L. (2017). Designing Cities with Children and Young People: Beyond playgrounds and Skate. New York: Routledge.
  5. Bouw, C., & Karsten, L. (2004). Stadskinderen; verschillende generaties over de dagelijk sestrijd om ruimte. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
  6. Brown, A., & Kristiansen, A. (2019). Urban Policies and the Right to the City: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship. UN Habitat. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000178090
  7. Brown, C., de Lannoy, A., McCracken, D., Gill, T., Gra, M., Wright, H., & Williams, H. (2019). Child-friendly cities. Health and Place, 33, 25-36.
  8. Carve, A., Timperio, A., & Crawfor, D. (2007). Playing it safe: The influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity – A review. Health & Place, 14, 217-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.06.004
  9. Chan, L., Erlings, E., Mizunoya, S., Zaw, H. (2016). A City fit for children: mapping and analysis of child friendly cities initiatives. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Centre for Rights and Justice Occasional Paper Series, 5. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29477.40166
  10. Chawla, L., & Van, Vliet W. (2017). Children’s rights to chield-friendly cities. In: Ruch, Martin D., Peterson-Badail, Michele; Freeman, Michael. Hand book of children’s rights. New York, London: Routledge.
  11. Christian, H., Zubrick, S., Foster, S., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Wood, L.,... Boruff, B. (2015). he influence of the neighborhood physical environment on early child health and development: A review and call for research. Health and Place, 33, 25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.005
  12. Dikeç, M., & Gilbert, L. (2012). Right to the city: homage or a new societal ethics? Capitalism Nature Socialism, 13(2), 59-74. DOI: 10.1080/10455750208565479
  13. Egli, V., Villanueva, K., Donnellan, N., Mackay, L., & Forsyth, E. (2020). Understanding Children’s Neighbourhood Destinations: Presenting the Kids-PoNd Framework. Children’s Geographies, 18(4), 420-434. doi:10.1080/14733285.2019.1646889
  14. Elkhouly, A. (2022). Child Friendly City as a Participatory approach to enhance sustainable development: Case of Mingdong Community, Ningbo. Visions for Future Cities, OP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1113. IOP publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1113/1/012023
  15. Franci, M. (1982). Designing Landscapes with Community Participation and Behavioral Research. Landscape Architecture Forum, 15(2), 15-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00200-1
  16. Gaster, S. (1991). Urban Children’s Access to their Neighborhood. Changes Over Three Generations. Environment & Behaviour, 23, 70-85. doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231004
  17. Ghafari, A., Ghale-Noui, M., & Emadi, Kh. (2014). Child friendly city; Evaluation and comparison of how to respond to the principles of a child-friendly city in modern and traditional contexts of Iran (case study: Sepahan Shahr and Jubareh neighborhood of Isfahan). City Identity, 18(8), 27-38. [in Persian]
  18. Gibson. J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  19.  Gokmen, Hikmet (2016). Children’s views about child friendly city: A case study from Izmir. Megaron ,11(4), 469-482. DOI: 10.5505/MEGARON.2016.20981
  20. Gray, L., & Brower, S. (1977). Activities of Children in Urban Neighborhoods. Baltimore,: MD: City of Baltimore Department of City Planning. DOI: 10.1080/01944368108976527
  21. Hart, R. (2010). A Shared City: The Political and Social Participation of Children. Florence, Italy: Bloure.
  22. Hart, R. (2014). Children self-governance and citizenship. In: C. Burke and C. Jones (eds), Education, childhood, and anarchism:123-128. London: Routledge.
  23. Horelli, L. (2017). Constructing a theoretical framework for environmental child- friendship. Children, Youth and Environment, 17(3), 267-292. DOI: 10.1353/cye.2007.0032
  24. Ieanian Statistic Center. (2016). G.I.S ffile of the statistic blocks of the 2016 Iranian Public Census of Population and Housing. [in Persian]
  25. Iran's laws and regulations information base. (2020). Child and Adolescent Protection Law. https://dotic.ir/. [in Persian]
  26. Kamyar-e Rad, S., Hadavand, M., & Kamyar-e Rad, S.A. (2021). The right to the city. Public Law Research, 22(70): 282-250. DIO: 10.22054/QJPL.2020.43300.2175. [in Persian]
  27. Karsten, L., & Felder, N. (2016). De nieuwe generatie stadskinderen; ruimte maken voor opgroeien. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: nai010 uitgevers.
  28. Khanna, R., Kapoor, R., & Khetrapal Kumar, V. (2022). Child friendly neighborhood: a concie review. International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity, 13(11), 295-311. doi.org/10.32804/irjmsh
  29. Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
  30. Krysiak, N. (2019). Designing child-friendly high density neighbourhoods. Australia: Winston Churchill Memorial Trust. http://www.landscape.cn/ueditor/php/upload/file/20200326/1585200499166982.pdf
  31.  Kyttä, A.M., Broberg, K., & Katariina, A. (2012). Urban Environment and Children's active lifestyle: SoftGIS revealing children's behavioral patterns and meaningful places. American journal of health promotio, 26(5), 137-46. doi:10.4278/ajhp.100914-QUAN-310
  32. Kytta, M. (2014). The extend of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordance as criteria of a child-friendly environment. Journal of Environmental psychology, 24(2): 179-198. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00073-2
  33. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Right to the City. In E. Kofman, & E. Lebas, Writings on Citie. Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Liefaard, T. (2022, March 15). International children’s rights: An ongoing global issue. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from Universiet Leidenl: https://www.leidenlawblog.nl/articles/international-childrens-rights-an-ongoing-global-issue
  35. Løndal, K., Karoline, B., & Anne-Karine, H. (2015). How Does a Manmade Outdoor Area in a Large, Urban Kindergarten Afford Physical Activity to 5-Year-Old Children? Children, Youth and Environments, 25(2), 125-152. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.2.0128
  36. Martin, Karen E., & Wood, Lisa J. (2013). We live here too’… what makes a child friendly neighbourhood?. In book: Wellbeing. Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell publishing.
  37. Matini, M., Saidi Rezvani, M., Ahmadian, R. (2014). Neighborhood design criteria based on the child-friendly city approach (the case: Farhang neighborhood of Mashhad). Arid Geographical Studies, 4(15), 112-91. [in Persian]
  38. Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social justice and the fight for public spac. NewYork, London: The Guilford Press
  39. Moaidfar, S., & Safaei, F. (2019). Planning a child-friendly city in order to promote youth participation (case study: Abadeh city). Geographical Explorations of Desert Regions, 7(2): 277-247. [in Persian]
  40. Mohammadyarzadeh, S. (2023). From the right to the city to sustainable urban development: education and culture underlying the creation of child-friendly cities. Journal of Space and Place Studies, 1(4): 116-105. Doi: 10.30495/jsps.2023.1968165.1014. [in Persian]
  41. Municipality District 7of Tehran. (2020). G.IS file of land use and the District activities. [in Persian]
  42. National Institute of Urban Affairs. (2017). Compendium of best practices of child friendly cities. Publisher: National Institue of Urban Affairs, New Delhi.
  43. Purcell, M. (2012). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. Geojournal, 58, 99-108.
  44. Rahimi, A., & Shahrokhian, A. (2014). Evaluation of child-friendly urban spaces and its role in revitalizing the old texture of Shiraz. Modern Urban Management, 2(6), 113-144. [in Persian]
  45. Rakhimova, N., McAslan, D.,   & Pijawka, D. (2022). Measuring child-friendly cities: developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning, doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589
  46.   Research Center of Islamic Republic of Iran Parliament. (1992). The law allowing the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to accede to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/92374. [in Persian]
  47. Research Center of Islamic Republic of Iran Parliament. (2021). National document on the rights of children and adolescents. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1675329. [in Persian]
  48. Riggio, E., & Kilban, T. (2000). The international secretariat for child-friendly cities: a global network for urban children. Environment & Urbanization, 12(2), 200-205. DOI: 10.1177/095624780001200216
  49. Suzanne, T., Brenton Button, S., & Gilliland., J. (2019). Nature makes people happy, that’s what iIt sort of means:’ children’s definitions and perceptions of nature in rural northwestern Ontario. Children’s Geographies, 14(6), 405-718. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018
  50. Tamjidi, Z., Saideh Zarabadi, Z., Farah, H. (2022). Analysis of the components of improving the quality of children's urban spaces with the right to the city approach (case study: District 12 of Tehran Municipality). Human Geography Research, 54(4), 1491-1509. DOI:10.22059/jhgr.2021.318033.1008245. [in Persian]
  51. Tehran City Renewal Organization. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation report on the implementation of the development plan of Khawaja Nezamolmolk neighborhood. [in Persian]
  52. Turner, J.F.C. (1977). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environment. Van, VlNew York: Pantheon Books.
  53. Unicef (2017). Advantage or Paradox? The challenge for children and young people of growing up urban. New York: UNICEF. https://data.unicef.org/resources/urban-paradox-report/
  54. Unicef (2018). UNICEF Child Friendly Cities and Communities Handbook. New York: Unicef. https://data.unicef.org/resources/urban-paradox-report/
  55. Unicef (2019). What is a child-friendly city?. Retrieved from https://childfriendlycities.org/
  56. Unicef (2022). The child friendly cities initiative. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.childfriendlycities.org/
  57. Unicef (2023). The Convention on the Rights of the Child: The children’s version. Retrieved from https://www.Unicef.org/
  58. Unicef (2023, November 21). What is a child friendly city? Retrieved from Unicef for every child: https://www.childfriendlycities.org/what-is-a-child-friendly-city
  59. Unicef Innocent Research Centre (2004). Building child friendly cities: A framework for Action, Florence. www.childfriendlycities.org
  60. United Nations. (2024). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. New York: UN: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/uk/desa/68-world-population-projected-live-urban-areas-2050-says-un
  61. Whitzman, C., Worthington, M., & Mizrachi, D. (2010). The Journey and the destination matter: child-friendly cities and children’s right to the city. Built Environment. DOI: 10.2148/benv.36.4.474
  62. World Bank. (2020). Demographic trends and urbanization. The World Bank Groups. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/260581617988607640/pdf/Demographic-Trends-and-Urbanization.pdf
  63. Wilson, K., Stephanie, E., Angela, P., & Jason, A. (2019). Children’s Perspectives on Neighbourhood Barriers and Enablers to Active School Travel: A Participatory Mapping Study. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 63(1), 112-128. doi:0.1111/ cag.12488
  64. Zanganeh, M., Hosseini, S.H., & Moradpour, M. (2023). Evaluation of child-friendly city criteria in new cities (the case: Golbahar New City). Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, 10(2), 133-149. DOI: 10.22067/JGUSD.2023.69743.1029. [in Persian]
  65. Zarei, F., Ahani, S., & Salehi, E. (2017). Investigating the child-oriented neighborhood in traditional and new contexts with emphasis on qualitative factors (the case: Sasandaj). Arman Shahr Architecture and Urbanism, 21, 223-336. [in Persian]
  66. Zarghami, A., Bagheri, E. (2019). Identifying the components of child-friendly places in residential areas. City Identity, 37(13), 115-106. [in Persian]
  67. Zerlina1, D. and Sulaiman, C. C. (2023). Towards the innovative planning for child-friendly neighbourhood in Jakarta. The 5th PlanoCosmo International Conference, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012023.