Sustainable city

Sustainable city

A Systematic Review of the Challenges of Realizing the Regeneration of Inefficient Urban Textures in Iran from the Perspective of Urban Governance

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2025.463151.1785
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
Today, the urban regeneration approach has been introduced as the latest policy for intervention in inefficient urban contexts in Iran and the world. With this approach, from Decision-Making processes, diversity, and multiplicity of actors, participation, if objectified and applied to the Governance structure and framework, will achieve improvement and success. However, the urban regeneration policy in Iran is still facing challenges regarding its proper and desirable realization. This research aims to identify the "Realization Challenges of Urban Regeneration in Iran from the Perspective of Urban Governance" and to try to achieve a comprehensive framework of challenges. In the present research, the Meta-Synthesis Method was used to refer to Iran's most important databases to achieve the mentioned goal. Therefore, the number of 42 domestic articles was selected based on principle and after screening and coded with ATLAS.Ti9 software, and the qualitative findings were analyzed and combined after being placed in the factors of urban governance efficiency. During the information extraction process, the 38 codes identified in the first order were categorized into 10 second-order codes (judgment sub-factors) and 4 third-order codes (selective codes-judgment efficiency factors). Laws and Regulations related to Regeneration, a comprehensive approach to Regeneration measures in intervention that is appropriate to any type of inefficient context, the presence of non-governmental organizations in the field of regeneration, and motivational and profitable frameworks for private sector investment. They are one of the most important challenges related to realizing urban regeneration policy in Iran. Also, the most important factor in the efficiency of governance of urban regeneration in Iran is to pay attention to the capacity of urban governments, which presents the most challenges.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
With the expansion of inefficiency areas inside the country, the approach of urban regeneration was introduced as the latest policy to intervene in such contexts. With this approach, from decision-making processes, diversity and multiplicity of actors, participation, if it is subject and applied with the governance structure and framework, it will achieve improvement and success. However, urban regeneration policy in Iran is still facing challenges for proper and desirable realization. The purpose of this research is to identify the "challenges of the realization of urban regeneration in Iran from the perspective of urban governance", as regeneration is considered as a comprehensive process, all the challenges in the path of realization of this approach in the conditions of Iran Note. Therefore, in the following, while presenting theoretical discussions about the nature and essence of urban regeneration, the selected articles of this field (with the aim of discovering the challenges of regeneration) were examined, systematically reviewed, and synthesized in response to the question of "challenges and obstacles." What is the non-realization of regeneration in the face of Iran's inefficient urban contexts from the governance perspective?" Finally, the challenges identified from the Meta-Synthesis results (analysis of selected articles) are framed and analyzed using the efficiency factors of urban governance.
 
Methodology
The method of this research is fundamental in terms of its purpose, and in order to answer the question and advance the research, the Meta-Synthesis method has been used. In the Meta-Synthesis method, according to the goals and questions of the research, the researcher enters articles into the Meta-Synthesis process and from the text of previous studies in the relevant field (here: urban regeneration), as data and from the document analysis method (according to the definition of Meta-Synthesis: abstract study, findings, and results) is used for the present research. In order to set the research questions, the parameters of what (What), who or the community under study (Who), when (When), and how (How) were used, which are presented below:
What: Iranian databases are examined for research articles on urban regeneration from 2018 to 2023. The purpose of the research is to identify the challenges of realizing the urban regeneration policy in the face of inefficient urban contexts, so only the propositions related to the obstacle, weakness, deficiency, and challenge for this approach will be analyzed.
It is noteworthy that this research does not only examine articles on the nature of governance in urban regeneration because, with the initial review, many of the mentioned articles only evaluate the criteria and dimensions of good governance in urban regeneration, and challenges and obstacles have not been mentioned much; also, adopting this selective strategy will ignore many problems and challenges raised in other articles. Therefore, this research has included and presented all the articles on the nature of regeneration.
 -Who: all Persian and scientific research articles on urban regeneration in Iran's internal databases (Noormagz, Magiran, and SID)
- When (time limit - When): studies from 2018 to 2023 (last five years)
- How: document analysis method (abstract review, findings, and results of documents) while using Atlas-ti9 software is used in this research.
Finally, 42 domestic articles were selected based on principles after screening and coded with ATLAS.Ti9 software. The qualitative findings were analyzed and combined after being placed in the efficiency factors of urban governance.
 
Results and discussion
During the information extraction process, 38 codes identified in the first order have been categorized into 10 second-order codes (judgment sub-factors) and 4 third-order codes (selection codes-judgment efficiency factors). In the realization of the regeneration policy to intervene in the inefficient urban contexts of Iran, it is clear that the challenges related to "the capacity of urban governments" and in its subgroup, "planning and supervisory control," are the most important in the field of regeneration from the point of view of our rulings (choice codes). In the realization of regeneration policy to intervene in the inefficient urban contexts of Iran, it is clear that "the capacity of urban governments" (choice code) and in its subset "planning and supervisory control" (second order category) based on frequency, the most important challenges of the regeneration approach are in the perspective of urban governance. Also, out of 38 challenge codes in the "first-order category" mode, 11 categories with a frequency greater than 20 have been identified, which are "rules and regulations related to regeneration," "comprehensive attitude to regeneration measures in intervention and appropriate to any type of inefficient context." "And the presence of non-governmental organizations in the regeneration field" are the most important codes.
 
Conclusion
It is noteworthy that the success of the urban regeneration approach is in identifying and improving the relevant challenges. The final challenges of regeneration policy are based on governance efficiency factors and the order of frequency of each factor, which include the capacity of urban governments, political systems and institutions, the relationship between the national-urban government, and the role of the private sector. It should also be said that most challenges are based on the centrality of integrated management, participation, urban regeneration, development plans, neglect of urban management to the conditions of each context, citizens, and mechanisms, the centrality and lack of dynamism of regeneration headquarters, etc. Also, based on the efficiency factors of urban governance and the reviewed articles, regeneration challenges can be examined at two national levels (in terms of interactions at the monitoring levels) and local levels (planning, control, and supervision) and with direct effects.
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

  1. Anwar, S. & Jeff, h. (2006). Local Governance in Developing Countries (Public-sector Governance and Accountability). Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
  2. Avis, W. R. (2016). Urban Governance (Topic Guide). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
  3. Berkel, R.V. (2006). The decentralisation of social assistance in The Netherlands. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610644407
  4. Cheshmehzangi A, Chen W, Mangi E and Heath T. (2023). Practical challenges of urban regeneration in China. Front. Sustain. Cities, 5, 913500. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.913500
  5. Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1-19. DOI:10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416
  6. Esko lagne, F. (2009). Urban Governance An essential determinant of city development?. Published by: World Vision Institute for Research and Development Friedrichsdorf, Germany
  7. Healey, P. (2020). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  8. Jiang, Y., Mohabir, N., Ma, R., Wu, L., and Chen, M. (2020). Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen. Land Use Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104411
  9. Jung, T. H., Lee, J., Yap, M. H. T., & Ineson, E. M. (2015). The role of stakeholder collaboration in culture-led urban regeneration: a case study of the Gwangju project, Korea. Cities, 44, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.003
  10. Liao, Z., & Liu, M. (2023) Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: a literature review. Front. Sustain. Cities, 5, 1115648. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648
  11. Liu, Y., Shen, L., Ren, Y., & Zhou, T. (2023). Regeneration towards suitability: A decision-making framework for determining urban regeneration mode and strategies. Habitat International, 138, 102870https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102870
  12. McDonald, S., Malys, N., & Malienė, V. (2009). Urban regeneration for sustainable communities. Technological and Economic Development, 15(1), 49–59.
  13. Mirzakhani, A., Turró, M., & Jalilisadrabad, S. (2021). Key stakeholders and operation processes in the regeneration of historical urban fabrics in Iran. Cities, 118, 103362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103362
  14. Pierre, J. (2014). Can urban regimes travel in time and space? Urban regime theory, urban governance theory, and comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review. 50, 864–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413518175
  15. Pieterse, E. (2000). Participatory urban governance: Practical approaches, regional trends and Urban Management Programme experiences. Nairobi: UN_Habitat.
  16. Roberts P., & Sykes H. (2000).The evolution definition and purpose of urban regeneration. A Handbook. Sage2000, 1-18
  17. Roberts, P., Sykes, H., & Granger, R. (2016). Urban regeneration. In (2nd ed., p. p. 3 & 18.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  18. Ruming, K. (2018). Urban Regeneration in Australia: Policies, Processes and Projects of Contemporary Urban Change. Edition 1, Publisher Routledge
  19. Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (A.Givian, Trans.). (1nd Ed.). Tehran: Scientific and cultural publications.
  20. Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
  21. Sandelowski, M. (2008). Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(1), 104-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04813.x
  22. Stryjakiewicz, T., Kudłak, R., Ciesiółka, P., Kołsut, B., & Motek, P. (2018). Urban Regeneration in Poland’s Non-Core Regions. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 316-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1361603
  23. Xie, F.; Liu, G.; Zhuang, T. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements. Land, 10, 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050545
  24. Zheng, H., Shen, G., & Wang, H. (2014). A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
  25. Zhuang, T., Qian, Q., Visscher, H., & Elsinga, M. (2017). Stakeholders’ expectations in urban renewal projects in china: a key step towards sustainability. Sustainability 9, 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091640
  26. Abdollahi, V., beygbabaye, B., & ezatpanah,. B. (2020). Recognition of regenerative capabilities in dysfunctional tissues (Case study: District 4 of Tabriz metropolitan municipality). Geography (Regional Planning), 10(40), 137-151. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1399.10.4.9.6. [In Persian]
  27. Abedi, S. (2019). The Analysis of Status of Urban Renewal Financing Methods in Upstream Documentation and Development Plans Laws of Iran. Rahyaft, 29 (2), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2019.13765. [In Persian]
  28. Ahmadi, S. A. A., Golpayegani, H. M., & komaili, M. H. (2023). Research article: Identifying, explaining and prioritizing land regeneration strategies of inner-city military centers (case study: Tehran Barracks 06). Defence Studies, 21(82), 142-165. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17351723.1402.21.82.6.9 [In Persian]
  29. Akbari N., Andalib A., Toghyani S., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Identifying barriers to achieving recreational goals in the planning of urban decay laws. Jgs, 21 (61), 464-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jgs.21.61.447. [In Persian]
  30. Ali Ahmadi, A., & Mirabedini, Z. (2019). Examining the Public Policy Making Process in Tehran's Urban Management (2012-2018). Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.22059/ppolicy.2019.71576. [In Persian]
  31. Aliakbari, E., Mousa Kazemi Mohammadi, S. M., Taleshi, M., & Moravej Al-Sharieh, M. M. (2022). Exploring the Regeneration Capacities of Dysfunctional Urban Tissues using Collaborative Planning Approach (Case Study: Shahid Bahonar Town of Mashhad Metropolis). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 20(3), 225-197. 225-197. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2022.78311.1181. [In Persian]
  32. Amanzadegan, A., Tabibian, M., Amanzadegan, M., Amanzadegan, M., Amanzadegan, H., & Amanzadegan, M. (2021). Prioritizing sustainable urban regeneration policies in the Historical area of Shiraz with attention to authority relations. Journal of Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 1(2), 1-20. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.2.1.1. [In Persian]
  33. Amanzadegan, E., & Tabibian, M. (2021). Strategic Analysis of the Regeneration of Historical Urban patterns (Case Study: Shiraz Historical pattern). Geography (Regional Planning), 11(45), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2021.135354 [In Persian]
  34. Amini M., Saremi H., & GHalibaf M. (2018). The Role of Urban Governance in the Urban Worn Texture Regeneration Process, Case Study: District 12 of Tehran. GeoRes, 33(3), 202-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/geores.33.3.202[In Persian]
  35. Ansari, M.M., & Afzali, K. (2020). A meta-analysis on the role of governance in the regeneration of inefficient urban tissues. Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research, 3(3), Vol2, 1-12. [In Persian]
  36. Asadi, A. (2022). Development of a Framework and Model for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in the Post-Corona Era (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 12(44), 171-200. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2022.42693.3038. [In Persian]
  37. Babaei, H., Rafiyan, M., Rousta, M., & Pasian Khamari, R. (2018). Analysis of Organizational Network of Participatory Management in Urban Renaissance of Gorgans Historical Context. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 15(63), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2018.67364. [In Persian]
  38. Bahadori, B., Rajaei, S., & Hataminejad, H. (2022). Analyzing the regeneration of old urban fabrics with the approach of spatial justice (Case Study: Nemat-Abad neighborhood, District 19, Tehran). Geography, 20(74),21-49. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/http://dor.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833739.1401.20.74.2.2. (In Persian)
  39. Bakhtiari, L., Sasanpor, S. F., shamaei, A., & soleimani, M. M. (2020). Analysis of the Effective Key Factors on Sustainable Urban Regeneration (Case study: Central part of Hamedan city). Geography (Regional Planning), 9(37), 123-142. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.10.37.8.7. [In Persian]
  40. Beyranvandzadeh, M., Najafi, E., & Shahinifar, M. (2022). Urban Integrated Policies and its Role in Recovering Inefficient Tissues: Case Study: Khorram Abad City. Geographical Engineering of Territory, 6(2), 397-410. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25381490.1401.6.12.3.2 [In Persian]
  41. Dolatabadi, R., Rahnama, M. R., & Sabouri, M. (2023). Examining the problems and challenges of regeneration of inefficient urban areas with the approach of sustainable development of Tehran. Journal of Geography and Regional Development. (Ready to publish). https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.81200.1249 [In Persian]
  42. Firoozi, M. A., Amanpour, S., & Zarei, J. (2019). Evaluation of Institutional Bases for Integrated Management in Sustainable Urban Regeneration of Outweared Textures (Case study: City of Ahvaz). Human Geography Research, 51(4), 891-909. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2018.231773.1007442 [In Persian]
  43. Gheysari, H., Modiri, A., & Kalantari Khalilabad, H. (1401). Stakeholder Conflicts in Regeneration of Urban Spaces; a Case Study of 30 Tir Street of Tehran. Iran. GeoRes, 38 (1), 73-82. [In Persian]
  44. Ghorbani, R., Zamani, A., & tahooni, M. (2023). An analysis of sustainable urban regeneration with the approach of cohesion and continuity based on scenario-based future research the case study northern neighborhoods of historical-cultural context Tabriz city. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(4), 41-63. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.342899.1696. [In Persian]
  45. Ghorbanloo, H., Masomi, M. T., & Yazdani, M. H. (2022). Strategic Analysis of Urban Regeneration with an Emphasis on Social Components in Peri-Urban Spaces (Case: the worn-out texture of Tehran's 20th district). Preipheral Urban Spaces Development, 4(2), 19-34. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26764164.1401.4.2.2.5. [In Persian]
  46. Goudarzi, G., Ziviyar Pardei, P., & Estelaji, A. (2020). A framework of urban regeneration management process based on urban regeneration governance approach.  Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 5(13), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.62271.1357. [In Persian]
  47. Habibi, M., & Khabiri, S. (2018). Urban Regeneration Policy: Perspectives and Necessities. Haftshahr, 4(62), 22-27. [In Persian]
  48. Haghighat Naeini, G., Farahani H., & Fanaei, S. (2022). Pathology of Urban Regeneration Programs in Terms of Mental Health: The Experts’ Perspective. GeoRes, 37 (3), 327-337. [In Persian]
  49. Haghighi, J., Saeede zarabadi, Z.S., behzadfar, M., & rafiyan, M. (2023). Pattern of Decision-Making Evaluation in Urban Regeneration. Jgs,23 (69), 459-477. doi:10.61186/jgs.23.69.459 [In Persian]
  50. Hatami, A., Mokhtari Malekabadi, R., Barzegar, S. and Shokri Firoozjah, P. (2021). Providing a model for recreating the historical context of Gorgan with a tourism development approach. Geographical Planning of Space11(40), 1-18. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.249129.3307 [In Persian]
  51. Hejazi, S. J. (2020). Assessing people's participation in the implementation of the urban regeneration plan (Case study: worn-out central texture of Ahvaz city). Geographical Engineering of Territory, 4(1), 117-132. doi: JGET-2004-1160. [In Persian]
  52. Hosseini, S.B. (2019). Analysis of Urban Regeneration Plans in Terms of Passive Defense, (Case Study: the Regeneration Plan of Kashan's Historical Fabric). Journal of Shahr-E- Tabavar, 1(1), 17-24. [In Persian]
  53. Iran Urban Development and Improvement Company. (2018).Sustainable urban regeneration in ineffective urban areas and neighborhoods. Iran Development Publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
  54. Iranmanesh, S,. Shakibayi, A., & Nazari Robati, F. (2019). Ranking Challenges Facing Construction Investors in Vanished Texture of Kerman. IUESA, 7 (27), 46-55. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23452870.1398.7.27.4.4. [In Persian]
  55. Izadfar, N., Rezaei, M., & Saraei, M. (2021). Identification of scenarios of the inefficient urban fabric based on sustainable regeneration approach on the Horizon of 1414 (Case study: Inefficient fabric of Yazd urban). Haft Hesar J Environ Studding, 9 (34), 53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.9.34.6 [In Persian]
  56. Jaliz, G., Hoseinzadeh, K., & Nazmfar, H. (2022). On the analysis of the strategic role of intermediate development in the recreation of urban decadent (worn out) districts (fabrics) (case study: metropolis of Tabriz, district 8). Jgs, 22 (67):113-135. doi:10.52547/jgs.22.67.113 [In Persian]
  57. Kamanroodi, M., Soleimani, M., Zanganeh, A., & Sharifjahed, S. (2022). Spatial integration in the regeneration of urban deteriorated texture case study Tehran. Geographical Planning of Space, 12(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.223657.3210. [In Persian]
  58. Karamdoost, M. (2018). The role of urban management in the reconstruction of worn-out structures in District 19 of Tehran Metropolitan Municipality. Unpublished Master Thesis, Payame Noor University, Rey city center, Geography and Urban Planning group. [In Persian]
  59. Kashefi. K, Razavian., M.T, & Sarvar., Rahim. (2020). Measuring and evaluating land ownership conflict resolution with the approach of urban regeneration. Case study: Farahzad neighborhood, District 2, Tehran. Journal of Human Geography, 12(3), 257-267. 20.1001.1.66972251.1399.12.3.13.9 [In Persian]
  60. Meshkini, A., Movahed, A., & Ahmadifard, N. (2016). Evaluating Policy of Regeneration in Urban Distressed Texture Using SWOT and QSPM Matrices (Case Study: Region 12 of Tehran Metropolis). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 4(4), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2016.62194. [In Persian]
  61. Mirgholami, M., & Ghaffari, H. (2023). Developing a regeneration model for the Chokhourlar neighborhood of Tabriz based on lessons learned from large-scale urban regeneration interventions. Journal of urban environment planning and development, 3(9), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.30495/juepd.2023.1978916.1139. [In Persian]
  62. Mohtaram Omidi, M., & Toosi, A. (2021). An overview of the legal challenges of revitalizing the inefficient urban tissues of Iran, a case study: (inefficient tissues of Mashhad city). quarterly of new attitudes in human geography, 13(2), 1026-1048. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1400.13.2.52.3. [In Persian]
  63. Nematikutenaee, N., Sarvar, R., & Asadian, F. (2021). Prioritizing Brownfield for Sustainable Urban Regeneration (Case study: neighborhoods of zone 16 of Tehran neighboring with the Fedaiyan Islam axis). Territory, 18(70), 85-105. [In Persian]
  64. Pakro, N., & Sattarzadeh, D. (2022). Investigating the Effective Components of Institutional Challenges of Citizen Participation in Sustainable Urban Regeneration Case Study: Tabriz City. Thahghighat Karbordi Olom joghraphiae, 22 (65), 79-101. [In Persian] doi:10.52547/jgs.22.65.79
  65. Pooyan, S., Tavakolan, A., & Kargar, B. (2023). Evaluation of informal settlements in Rasht in order to provide sustainable urban regeneration strategies. Geographical Engineering of Territory, 7(2), 433-446. doi: 10.22034/jget.2023.152194 [In Persian]
  66. Pourjafar, M., Jalili Sadrabad, S., & Nikpour, Z. (2023). Challenges to Renovate Areas in Iran with Emphasis on the Gentrification Phenomenon. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(41), 211-225. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2023.299538.2530 [In Persian]
  67. Rahimi, H., & Heidari, M. (2023). Residents' Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Urban Regeneration and Renewal Laws in the Decayed Districts of Hamidia City, Iran. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 13(46), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2023.43113.3052 [In Persian]
  68. Rasooli, M., Ahadnejad, M., & Heydari, M. T. (2021). Regeneration Explanation of Urban Old Textures with the Integrated Method of FEMA and SMART (Case Study: Zanjan City). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 11(40), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2021.6512 [In Persian]
  69. Rasoolnazi, S., Naghibi, F., & Khosronia, M. (2022). Investigating the role of public and local capacities in Regeneration dysfunctional urban fabric (Case study: The worn texture of Urmia). Human Geography Research, 54(1), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.305401.1008135 [In Persian]
  70. Rezvani, L., Ahmadzadeh, H., & Houshyar, H. (2022). Investigation of key drivers affecting the regeneration of dysfunctional urban tissues Case study: Worn texture of Urmia. Research and Urban Planning, 13(50), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.30495/jupm.2021.27631.3841. [In Persian]
  71. Rousta, M., Soleimani, M., Sarafi, M., & Rafiyan, M. (2022). Scale analysis of urban regeneration projects and its effects on the quality of life of residents with emphasis on the Iran experience. Motaleate Shahri, 11(41), 99-112. doi: 10.34785/J011.2022.404. [In Persian]
  72. Saberifar, R. (2022). Investigating the Factors Affecting Public Participation in Urban Old Texture Regeneration, Case Study of Mashhad City. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 13(3), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2020.46261.2346. [In Persian]
  73. Saberifar, S. (2022). Feasibility study of presenting a model for the effect of social participation on the regeneration of dis-functioned urban textures (Case study of Mashhad). Urban Sociological Studies, 12(44), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.30495/uss.2022.699369 [In Persian]
  74. Sarvar, R., & Khaliji, M. A. (2021). Urban policy in the field of wicked problems. Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 1(1), 1-16. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.1.10.8. [In Persian]
  75. Sheikh Ahmadi, A., & Mohammadi, M.S,. (2021): Promoting safety and security by relying on social capital based on cultural regeneration approach (Case study: Historical context of Urmia), Journal of Urban Environmental Policy, 1(2), 103-120. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.2.7.7. [In Persian]
  76. Vahabzadeh, N., Andalib, A., & majedi, H. (2020). Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Geography (Regional Planning), 9(37), 881-898. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.10.37.49.8. [In Persian]
  77. Yazdani, S., Fattahizadeh, F., Sheikholeslami A., & Etemad, G. (2021). Presenting a Model of Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Historical Contexts with an Integrated Approach (Case Study: Darvazeh Rey Neighborhood and Qom Bazaar Area. GeoRes 36 (4), 437-446. [In Persian]
  78. Zamani, B., & Asadpour, H. (2023). Meta-analysis of the obstacles to the manifestation of urban regeneration projects in Iran. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 11(2), 75-97. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.355628.1799. [In Persian]
  79. Zangisheieh, S., Rafiean, M., Ghaedrahmati, S.,& Meshkini, A. (2021).Communicative Planning Governance Network sustainable regeneration slum textures (case study: Kermanshah city). Human Geography Research, 53(4), 1165-1190. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.249755.1007617. [In Persian]
  80. ZoAlam, A. (2006). Thinking about the concept of challenge. Zamane magazine, 4(36):37-34. [In Persian]