Sustainable city

Sustainable city

Factors affecting the realization of the learning city in Ahvaz metropolis

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2024.458976.1779
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
The present study aimed to analyze the interpretive structural (ISM) factors that affect the realization of the learning city in the Ahvaz metropolis; first, the concepts and variables examined in the subject literature were determined using the documentation method. Based on the literature findings and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 scientific and executive experts, the factors affecting the realization of the learning city were extracted in the form of 19 indicators to check the agreement between the experts, determine the agreement, and prioritize the indicators. These factors were collectively agreed upon using the Delphi method. During three rounds, the questionnaire tool was used, and on the Likert spectrum, based on the mean and standard deviation, the non-priority indicators were removed. Finally, 13 indicators were agreed upon. In the end, using the method of structural-interpretive analysis, leveling and creating a model, and determining the relationship between the factors and analysis were done. The research findings showed that the criteria of providing high-speed internet and easy access to educational technologies (C1), creating innovative and suitable educational centers for all types of students and students (C2), formulating policies to support education and the development of public education (C8), and supporting industries and startups related to education and technology (C11) are independent variables. These variables have low dependence and high driving power. In other words, high influence and low dependence are the characteristics of these variables. The criteria for using data mining technologies to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the city’s educational system (C3), promote the culture of learning in society (C4), create opportunities for participation in decision-making related to urban education (C7), and develop public transportation systems and the creation of accessible access environments to educational centers (C9) are dependent variables. These variables have strong dependence and weak driving power.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
With the development of learning at the beginning of the 21st century, the world is in the middle of significant changes. In the meantime, the cities of the world are at the center of attention for these changes in the learning process. The structural and functional changes in social and political systems have created different bases in the administration of city affairs. These developments have caused concerning events such as environmental development, concepts such as green city or clean city; regarding the development and growth of technology, concepts such as electronic city, virtual city, digital city, information city, and concerning human factors, concepts such as knowledge city, learning city, creative city, should be brought up and brought to the attention of researchers, experts, and policymakers.
Learning is an indispensable part of life. Learning is a relatively permanent change in a person’s feelings, thinking, and behavior based on experience. Today, cities are places where people live and work and places of leisure, culture, business, and education. According to this, managers and urban policymakers have noticed concepts such as the learning city in recent years.
 
Methodology
This applied study employed a descriptive-analytical research method and survey research design. At first, related sources were extracted using a documentary method, and according to the communication structure of the sources and the process of the studies, the concepts and variables investigated in the subject literature were determined. Based on the literature and semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 15 scientific and executive urban experts, the factors that affect the realization of the city of learning were extracted in the form of 19 indicators. Then, to check the agreement between the experts’ opinions and determine the agreement, prioritize the indicators of these factors using the Delphi method. A questionnaire and the Likert scale were employed during three rounds, and the relevant indicators were collectively agreed upon. Based on the mean and standard deviation, non-priority indicators were removed, and 13 indicators were agreed upon. The sample size for the Delphi method was ten experts with knowledge and expertise related to the field under study, and it was done using non-probability sampling. In the end, using ISM, leveling and creating a model, and determining the relationship between the factors and analysis were done.
 
Results and discussion
The current research has been written in the direction of ISM of factors affecting the realization of the learning city in Ahvaz metropolis. For this purpose, in this research, after reviewing the basics and theoretical concepts about learning cities and their components and indicators, the criteria and measurement indicators were developed from the perspective of the learning city approach. Then, based on the measurement framework of the research, ISM was used. This research investigates 13 factors affecting the realization of the learning city in Ahvaz city. In this method, six steps were examined. An interactive matrix using experts’ opinions was formed in the first step. Then, in the second step, the primary achievement matrix was formed by converting the structural self-interaction matrix to zero and one.
In the third step, its internal consistency should be established after the initial acquisition matrix is obtained. For example, if variable 1 leads to variable 2 and variable 2 leads to variable 3, variable 1 should also lead to variable 3, and if this state is not established in the access matrix, the matrix should be modified, and such relationships should be modified and created. Each criterion’s input (prerequisite) and output (achievement) criteria were calculated in the fourth step. Then, the common factors were specified. In this step, the highest level criterion is that the output set (achievement) equals the common set. In the fifth step, the network of ISM interactions is drawn using the levels obtained from the criteria. If there is a relationship between two variables, i and j, we show it with a directed arrow. The research model can also be shown in terms of influence and dependence in the sixth step of the MICMAC analysis model.
 
Conclusion
The criteria for providing high-speed internet and easy access to educational technologies (C1), creating innovative and suitable educational centers for all types of students and students (C2), developing policies to support education and the development of public education (C8), and supporting related industries and startups with education and technology (C11) are independent variables. These variables have low dependence and high driving power. In other words, high influence and low dependence are the characteristics of these variables. The criteria for using data mining technologies to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the city’s education system (C3), promote the culture of learning in society (C4), create opportunities for participation in decision-making related to urban education (C7), and develop public transportation systems and the creation of accessible access environments to educational centers (C9) are dependent variables. These variables have strong dependence and weak direction. These variables generally have a high influence and little dependence on the system. The rest of the criteria are of the interface type; these variables have high dependence and driving power. In other words, the influence of these criteria is very high, and any small change in these variables causes fundamental changes in the system.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

  1. Akram, M., Wasim, F., & Alcantud, J.C.R. (2021). Multi-criteria Optimization Technique with Complex Pythagorean Fuzzy N-soft Information. Int J Comput Intell Syst, 14(167). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-021-00008-x.
  2. Atchoarena, D., & Howells, A. (2021). Advancing Learning Cities: Lifelong Learning and the Creation of a Learning Society. In book: Powering a Learning Society during an Age of Disruption. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0983-1-12
  3. Azar, A., & Bayat, K. (2008). Designing a business process oriented model with interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Information Technology Management Journal, 1(1), 1-16. [In Persian]
  4. Bagheri, M., & Sadeghian Nodoushan, M. (2016). Stakeholder Theory in Company Law. Judgment, 16(87), 27-58. [In Persian]
  5. Bhasin, H. (2021). What is a Learning Organization?. Peter Senge’s 5 Disciplines of Learning.
  6. Biao, I. (2019). Learning Cities, Town Planning, and the Creation of Livelihoods, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8134-5.
  7. Campbell, T. (2009). Learning cities: Knowledge, capacity and competitiveness. Habitat International, 33(2), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.012
  8. Choi, D. (2008). The Trend and Development of Learning Cities in Korea. Bulletin (article), No1605.pdf. DOI: 10.14943/J.HighEdu.16.59
  9. Di Sivo, M., & Ladiana, D. (2010). Towards a learning City the neighborhood lab and the lab net. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5349-5356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.872
  10. Di Sivo, M., & Ladiana, D. (2010). Towards a Learning City the Neighborhood Lab and the Lab net. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5349-5356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.872
  11. Duangduen, Ch., & Chomsupak C. (2021). The Learning Disciplines for Support Personnel to Build a Learning Organization of Ramkhamhaeng University. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(1), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.71.1.6
  12. Emas, R. (2015). The concept of sustainable development: definition and defining principles. Brief for GSDR, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34980.22404
  13. Facer, K., & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Towards a research agenda for the ‘actually existing’ Learning City. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 151-167. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1551990
  14. Facer, K., & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Understanding Learning Cities as discursive, material and affective infrastructures. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 168-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1552581
  15. Ghaffari, Gh. (2011). Social capital and social security. First edition, Tehran: Sociologists Publications. [In Persian]
  16. Goodarzi, M., & Hajipour, N. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Distribution of Selected Urban Health Indices in Ahvaz Metropolis. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 6(4), 769-790. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2018.261127.933
  17. Hee Han, S., & Makino, A. (2013). Learning cities in East Asia: Japan, the Republic of Korea and China. International Review of Education, 59(4), 443-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9372-2
  18. Hirju, L., & Georgescu, R-L. (2023). The Concept of Learning Cities: Supporting Lifelong Learning through the Use of Smart Tools. Smart Cities, 6(3), 1385-1397; https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030066
  19. Iamtrakul, P., Chayphong, S., & Yat Wai Lo, A. (2022). Exploring the Contribution of Social and Economic Status Factors (SES) to the Development of Learning Cities (LC). Sustainability, 14(19). DOI: 10.3390/su141912685
  20. Jain, M. (2005). Shikshantar: The Peoples' Institute for Rethinking Education and Development. Journal of Futures Studies, 10(1), 115-118.‌
  21. Jordan, L., Longworth, N., & Osborne, M. (2014). The Rise and fall and Rise Again of Learning Cities. In book: Challenging the 'European Area of Lifelong Learning', DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7299-1_24
  22. Kearns, P. (2015). Learning cities on the move. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 1-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059170.pdf
  23. Khalili, A., Jahangir, S., & Shamsodini, A. (2023). Analyzing the factors and drivers affecting the sustainable development of Qazvin urban areas with a foresight approach. Journal of Sustainable city, 6(4), 47-63. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2024.418341.1742 [In Persian]
  24. Lage Chang, D., Sabatini-Marques, J., Moreira da Costa, E., Mauricio Selig, P., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). Knowledge-based, smart and sustainable cities: a provocation for a conceptual framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity volume 4, Article number: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0087-2
  25. Lido, C., Reid, K., & Osborne, M. (2019). Life wide learning in the city: Novel big data approaches to exploring learning with large scale surveys, GPS and social media. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1554531.
  26. Longworth, N. (2011). Norman Longworth on Learning Cities. www.longlearn.org.uk Jain, M. (2005). Shikshantar: The Peoples' Institute for Rethinking Education and Development. Journal of Futures Studies, 10(1), 115-118.‌
  27. Lotfi, S., & Shojaian, A. (2023). Evaluating Urban SDI of Ahvaz using Readiness Index Model. Journal of Sustainable city, 6(1), 1-18. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2022.297692.1519 [In Persian]
  28. Mohammadi, A. (2009). Community-based capacity building: supporting the organization of informal settlements. Seven Cities, 2 (29 and 30), 97-113. [In Persian]
  29. Moosavi M. (2007). Social Participation as a Component of Social Capital. Refahj, 6(23), 67-92. [In Persian]
  30. Mostafazadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. R. (2014). Designing the Model of Social Capital Development in Universities and Higher Education Centers. Social Capital Management, 1(2), 161-182. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2014.53460[In Persian]
  31. Németh, B. (2019). Learning Cities. Participatory-focused Community Development in Adult and Lifelong Education. journal of education, 7(2), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.17702
  32. Németh, B. (2020). Learning Cities in Progress. Andragoška Spoznanja, 26(1), 67-84. DOI: 10.4312/as.26.1.67-84
  33. Németh, B., Issa, O., Diba, F., & Tuckett, A. (2020). Learning Cities and Learning Communities: Analyzing Contextual Factors and Th eir Impacts on Adult and Lifelong Learning in Urban Settings. Andragoške Studije, 1/2020, doi: 10.5937/AndStud2001017N.
  34. Okocha, A. A. (2001). Facilitating Career Development through Super's Life Career Rainbow. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Facilitating-Career-Development-through-Super%27s-Okocha/be2dc2489354b3254056a389f725748d2c5fe80b
  35. Popović, K. Maksimović, M., Jovanović, A., & Joksimović, J. (2020). New Learning Sites in Learning Cities – Public Pedagogy and Civic Education. Andragoška Spoznanja, 26(1), 33-51. DOI: 10.4312/as.26.1.33-51
  36. Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Introduction, Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. R.‌
  37. Rafiei, F. (2004). Application of two educational theories in the classroom: constructionist theory, social learning theory. Iranian Journal of Nursing, 15 (32- 33), 50-56. [In Persian]
  38. Ramazanian, M., Moradi, M., & Soltani, F. (2015). Analysis of cultural barriers to interoperability in the automotive supply chain using interpretative structural modeling approach. Organizational Culture Management, 13(2), 369-391. doi: 10.22059/jomc.2015.54106[In Persian]
  39. Saadat R. (2007). The Estimation of Level and Distribution of Social Capital in Iran's Provinces. refahj. 6(23), 173-196. [In Persian]
  40. Saraei, M., & Hajforoush, S. (2021). Review of Learning City Indicators in the areas of Yazd city. The Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 9(1), 87-104. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2345332.1400.9.1.5.7 [In Persian]
  41. Super, D. E., Savickas, M.L., & Super, C. M. (1996). The Life-span, Life-space Approach to Career Choice & Development Sanfrancisco. CA: Joosey-Bass Publishers.
  42. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S., Gupta, A., & Shankar, R. (2007). Development of a balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1), 25-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400710717073
  43. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL). (2017). Learning Cities and the SDGs: A guide to action.
  44. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL). (2020). embracing a culture of lifelong learning: Contribution to the Futures of Education initiative. http://cradall.org/content/embracing-culture-lifelong-learning-contribution-futureseducation-initiative-uil.
  45. Webb, S., Holford, J., Hodge, S., Milana, M., & Waller, R. (2020). Learning cities and implications for adult education research. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 39(5-6), 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2020.1853937.
  46. Wilson, B. (2014). Learning city-regions revisited: A new way forward. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 20(1), 77. DOI: 10.7790/cibg.v20i1.21
  47. Yang, J. (2012). An Overview of Building Learning Cities as a Strategy for Promoting Lifelong Learning. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 18(2), 97-113. DOI: 10.7227/JACE.18.2.8
  48. Zayyari, K. A., & Mansouri Etminan, A. (2022). Investigation and analysis of urban areas of Mashhad from the perspective of the components of the learning city. Geography and Urban Space Development, (), -. doi:10.22067/jgusd.2022.77861.1226[In Persian]
  49. Zeman, K., Chénier, Ch., Christ, G., Chew Leung, J., Bell, R., & Cornwall, T. (2022). Education Indicators in Canada: Report of the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program.
  50. Ziyari, K. (2001). Sustainable development and the responsibility of urban planners in the 21st century. Journal of Faculty of Literature and Humanities, 48 (160), 371-385. [In Persian]