Identifying the Financial and Economic Consequences of Urban Sprawl on Urban Management

Document Type : Article extracted From phd dissertation

Authors

1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Territorial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/jsc.2024.339184.1614

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
This study seeks to find the financial and economic consequences of urban sprawl on urban management. For this purpose, it uses an interpretive approach and a systematic Meta-synthesis method. The statistical population is the findings of other researchers in the field of urban sprawl in the period 1970-2022. The data were encoded and interpreted using MAXQDA software. The results show that the financial and economic benefits of urban sprawl fall into seven categories: 'real Estate Income; business, sales and services; government subsidies; reduction in security costs; reduction in the cost of environment and urban services; reduction in physical costs and urban development; and reduction in the cost of transportation and traffic. But the costs of urban sprawl include "social and cultural costs; transportation and traffic costs; physical and urban development costs; environmental and urban services costs; current and administrative services costs; security and emergency services costs”. Most researchers have acknowledged that the sprawl costs far more than the financial and economic benefits to the city, with most of the costs being borne by the environment and urban services, as well as transportation and traffic. Regarding the benefits of urban sprawl, researchers have emphasized the benefits of real estate. In many cities around the world, including cities in developing countries, extensive urban land ownership and physical assets mean that taxes and charges on them can significantly increase public revenues, which can continue to increase as urban productivity increases. It seems that until there is not a fundamental change in the financial structure of urban management; the process of urban sprawl is inevitable
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
International literature on urban sprawl mainly emphasizes its environmental, social and economic effects on urban areas. Many studies have dealt with the environmental effects of urban sprawl. From a theoretical and empirical point of view, there are no clear answers about the impact of urban sprawl on the finances of municipalities and local governments. From a theoretical point of view, the potential impact of sprawl on the financial balance of local governments is unclear. On the one hand, municipalities can obtain more resources through construction, local economic activities, and property taxes. On the other hand, the cost of providing services and improving infrastructure can be incremental, thus significantly reducing productivity in sprawled areas. The available empirical literature shows that low-density areas have a negative impact on local service costs and financial stability, but at the same time, population attraction and construction activities can increase financial revenues. Researchers have examined the effects of different densities and urban developments and spatial patterns and have shown that revenue growth is associated with population growth and density, but the relationship between these variables is clearly dependent on local factors, such as local economic structure and urban service scope, and the conclusions may vary considerably from place to place. Therefore, considering the importance of the subject, this study intends to identify and draw the financial and economic consequences of urban sprawl in the revenue structure and expenditures of the municipalities using a Meta-synthesis approach and systematic review of research literature. In this research, two years are proposed that:
1- What are the financial and economic benefits of urban management due to urban sprawl?
1- What are the financial and economic costs of urban management due to urban sprawl?
 
Methodology
For this purpose, it uses an interpretive approach and a systematic Meta-synthesis method. The statistical population is the findings of other researchers in the field of urban sprawl in the period 1970-2022. The sampling method is systematic and the benefits and costs of horizontal urban distribution in the form of categories have been extracted by carefully studying 79 scientific sources out of 148 sources reviewed based on the title, abstract and content analysis. Data were coded and interpreted using MAXQDA ANALYTICS PRO 2020 software. In order to evaluate the reliability and quality control of the findings, an excellent agreement was reached between the two evaluators based on the index of "two coders".
 
Results and discussion
Based on sources, 434 primary codes have been reviewed and extracted. Of these codes, 86 codes were identified in a more abstract step in the form of important and selective categories for the financial and economic benefits of horizontal urban distribution. Through 3 categories "real estate, business, sales and services, government subsidies" to increase revenue and 4 categories "security, environment and urban services, physical and urban planning, transportation and traffic" to reduce costs, the first question was answered. But to answer the second question, the 348 codes were categorized into six categories: "social and cultural costs, transportation and traffic costs, physical and urban development costs, environmental and urban services costs, current and administrative services costs, security and emergency services costs". Based on the literature on the urban sprawl, most researchers have acknowledged that the urban sprawl costs far more than its financial and economic benefits to the city.
 
Conclusion
Most researchers have acknowledged that the sprawl costs far more than the financial and economic benefits to the city, with most of the costs being borne by the environment and urban services, as well as transportation and traffic. Regarding the benefits of urban sprawl, researchers have emphasized the benefits of real estate. In many cities around the world, including cities in developing countries, extensive urban land ownership and physical assets mean that taxes and charges on them can significantly increase public revenues, which can continue to increase as urban productivity increases. It seems that until there is not a fundamental change in the financial structure of urban management; the process of urban sprawl is inevitable. A review of the literature related to urban sprawl in Iran shows that researchers have mostly focused on urban distribution in different cities and no research has yet examined the financial and economic effects of urban distribution in Iranian cities. Most international researches have been done in developed countries with different urban management structures from Iran. Most of these researches have introduced the form of compact growth as an effective strategy by considering the costs of urban sprawl. Given the relatively high rate of urbanization in Iran and the horizontal expansion of many large cities and metropolises in recent years, a careful study of the financial and economic effects of urban sprawl on urban management and municipal budgets can help clarify this issue in the literature.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Ardeshiri, M., & Ardeshiri, A. (2011). The issue of sprawl vs compact city towards sustainability in developing countries. Built and Natural Environment Research Papers, 4(1), 20-33.
  2. Bajari, P., & Kahn, M. E. (2004). The private and social costs of urban sprawl: The lot size versus commuting tradeoff (pp. 1-42). Working paper.
  3. Batt, H. W. (2003). Stemming sprawl: The fiscal approach. Suburban sprawl: Culture, theory, and politics, 239-254.
  4. Benito, B., Bastida, F., & Guillamón, M. D. (2010). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services: an evaluation of Spanish local governments. Lex localis, 8(3), 245. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/8.3.245-264(2010)
  5. Bergantino, A. S., Di Liddo, G., & Porcelli, F. (2020). Regression-based measure of urban sprawl for Italian municipalities using DMSP-OLS night-time light images and economic data. Applied Economics, 52(38), 4213-4222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1733475
  6. Bertinelli, L., & Black, D. (2004). Urbanization and growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1), 80-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.003
  7. Bhatia, K. S. (2005). Does sprawl cost more? The influence of urban form on public transportation expenditure. State University of New York at Buffalo.
  8. Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International regional science review, 23(2), 160-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016001700761012710
  9. Brueckner, J. K., & Kim, H. A. (2003). Urban sprawl and the property tax. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022260512147
  10. Brueckner, J. K., Mills, E., & Kremer, M. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics [with comments]. Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs, 65-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/urb.2001.0003
  11. Burchell, R. W. (1997). Economic and Fiscal Costs (and Benefits) of Sprawl. The Urban Lawyer, 159-181.
  12. Burchell, R. W., & Galley, C. C. (2003). Projecting incidence and costs of sprawl in the United States. Transportation Research Record, 1831(1), 150-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1831-17
  13. Burchell, R. W., & Listokin, D. (1978). The fiscal impact handbook: Projecting the local costs and revenues related to growth. Center for Urban Policy Research.
  14. Burchell, R. W., & Mukherji, S. (2003). Conventional development versus managed growth: The costs of sprawl. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1534-1540. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1534
  15. Burchell, R. W., DolphIn, W., R. & Horvath, W. (2010). Fiscal and costs-of-sprawl impacts of 2010–2030 projected growth on the county of Santa Fe and Santa Fe County/other public school districts.
  16. Burchell, R. W., Downs, A., McCann, B., & Mukherji, S. (2005). Sprawl costs: Economic impacts of unchecked development. Island Press.
  17. Burchell, R. W., Shad, N. A., Listokin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S. & Gall, M. (1998). The costs of sprawl-revisited (No. Project H-10 FY'95).
  18. Burk, R. A., & Kallberg, J. (2012). Rule of capture and urban sprawl: a potential federal financial risk in groundwater-dependent areas. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28(4), 659-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.683765
  19. Camagni, R., Gibelli, M. C., & Rigamonti, P. (2002). Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological economics, 40(2), 199-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00254-3
  20. Cao, G., Feng, C., & Tao, R. (2008). Local “land finance” in China's urban expansion: challenges and solutions. China & World Economy, 16(2), 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2008.00104.x
  21. Carruthers, J. I. (2002). Evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs: An analytic framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 391-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100404
  22. Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(4), 503-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b12847
  23. Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2008). Does smart growth'matter to public finance?. Urban Studies, 45(9), 1791-1823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098008093379
  24. Chapple, K. (2018). The fiscal trade-off: Sprawl, the conversion of land, and wage decline in California’s metropolitan regions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 294-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.002
  25. Chenail, R. J. (2009). Bringing method to the madness: Sandelowski and Barroso’s Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 8-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.2820
  26. Cheung, C. (2014). Deconstructing Canada's Housing Markets: Finance, Affordability and Urban Sprawl (No. 1145). OECD Publishing.
  27. Ciscel, D. H. (2001). The economics of urban sprawl: Inefficiency as a core feature of metropolitan growth. Journal of Economic issues, 35(2), 405-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506374
  28. Collier, P., Glaeser, E., Venables, T., Manwaring, P., & Blake, M. (2017). Land and property taxes: exploiting untapped municipal revenues. Policy brief.
  29. Couch, C., Petschel-Held, G., & Leontidou, L. (Eds.). (2008). Urban sprawl in Europe: landscape, land-use change and policy. John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470692066
  30. Coyne, W. (2003). The Fiscal Cost of Sprawl. How Sprawl Contributes to Local Governments’ Budget Woes. Environment Colorado Research and Policy Center, 18.
  31. Davis, A. Y., Pijanowski, B. C., Robinson, K., & Engel, B. (2010). The environmental and economic costs of sprawling parking lots in the United States. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.002
  32. De Vos, J., & Witlox, F. (2013). Transportation policy as spatial planning tool; reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.014
  33. Environmental Defence. (2013). The high costs of sprawl: Why building more sustainable communities will save us time and money. Environmental Defence.
  34. Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?. Journal of the American planning association, 63(1), 107-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975728
  35. Garbine H (2007) Los costes econ ~ omicos y sociales de la ciudad de baja densidad. In: Indovina, F. (Coord.) La ciudad de baja densidad, logicas y contenci on. Diputaci on Provincial de Barcelona, pp. 203–240.
  36. Gielen, E., Riutort-Mayol, G., Miralles i Garcia, J. L., & Palencia Jimenez, J. S. (2021). Cost assessment of urban sprawl on municipal services using hierarchical regression. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(2), 280-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2399808319869345
  37. Goodman, C. B. (2019). The fiscal impacts of urban sprawl: Evidence from US county areas. Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(4), 3-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12239
  38. Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., & Yu, G. (1998). Metropolitan and non-metropolitan employment trends in the US: recent evidence and implications. Urban Studies, 35(7), 1037-1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984475
  39. Hall, J. (2009). The benefits and costs of urban sprawl or leapfrogging urban development. University of Western Sydney. 
  40. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
  41. He, X., & Sim, N. C. (2015). Does economic growth affect urbanization? New evidence from China and the Chinese National Congress. Journal of asian economics, 36, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2014.12.003
  42. Heikkila, E. J., & Craig, S. G. (1991). Nested fiscal impact measures using the new theory of local public goods. Journal of Regional Science, 31(1), 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1991.tb00131.x
  43. Hortas‐Rico, M. (2014). Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 843-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12022
  44. Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban studies, 47(7), 1513-1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353620
  45. Huang, Z., Chen, S., Dong-Mian, F.U. (2013). Influential factors and regional differences of China's land finance: an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Econ. Manage. J. 6, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030742
  46. Hulsey, B. (1996). Sprawl costs us all: How uncontrolled sprawl increases your property taxes and threatens your Quality of Life. Madison, WI: Sierra Club Midwest Office.
  47. Ida, T., & Ono, H. (2019). Urban sprawl and local public service costs in Japan. In Advances in local public economics (pp. 195-215). Springer, Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3107-7_11
  48. KeJsev, T. W. (1996). The fiscal impacts of alternative land uses: What do cost of community service studies really tell us?. Community Development, 27(1), 78-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15575339609489850
  49. Klug, S., & Hayashi, Y. (2012). Urban sprawl and local infrastructure in Japan and Germany. Journal of infrastructure systems, 18(4), 232-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000101
  50. Knaap, G. (2003). Talking Smart in the United States’, In Haccoû, H. A. & Middleton, D. (eds.) Quest for Partners in Research on Multifunctional and Intensive Land Use (Gouda: Habiforum).
  51. Kotchen, M. J., & Schulte, S. L. (2009). A meta-analysis of cost of community service studies. International Regional Science Review, 32(3), 376-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0160017609336082
  52. Ladd, H. F. (1994). Fiscal impacts of local population growth: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(6), 661-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)90006-X
  53. Laurance, W. F., & Engert, J. (2022). Sprawling cities are rapidly encroaching on Earth’s biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(16), e2202244119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202244119
  54. Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2009). Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(1), 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.03.002
  55. Lieske, S. N. (2015). Costs of sprawl in the metropolitan West: census block group evaluation of public service expenditures. In Western Economics Forum (Vol. 14, No. 1837-2016-151866, pp. 1-11).
  56. Lieske, S. N., McLeod, D. M., Coupal, R. H., & Srivastava, S. K. (2012). Determining the relationship between urban form and the costs of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(1), 155-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b37099
  57. Lin, G. C., & Yi, F. (2011). Urbanization of capital or capitalization on urban land? Land development and local public finance in urbanizing China. Urban Geography, 32(1), 50-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.1.50
  58. Lityński, P. (2019). Budżetowe konsekwencje żywiołowego rozprzestrzeniania się miast dla samorządów gminnych. Zeszyty Naukowe/Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie. Seria Specjalna, Monografie, (265).
  59. Lityński, P. (2020). Urban Sprawl of Poznań: Morphological and Microeconomic Profile. Rozwój Regionalny I Polityka Regionalna, (52), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2020.52.06
  60. Lityński, P., & Hołuj, A. (2017). Urban sprawl costs: The valuation of households’ losses in Poland. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 8(1), 11-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/JSSP.2017.1.02
  61. Logan, J.R., Molotch, H.L. (2007). Urban Fortunes: the Political Economy of Place. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  62. Łukomska, J., & Neneman, J. (2020). Urban sprawl and the financial standing of municipalities. Optimum. Economic Studies, 4 (102), 40-57. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.15290/oes.2020.04.102.04
  63. Montejano, J., Monkkonen, P., Guerra, E., & Caudillo, C. (2019). Costs and Benefits of Urban Expansion: Evidence from Mexico, 1990-2010. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  64. Morris, D. E. (2009). It's a Sprawl World After All: The human cost of unplanned growth--and visions of a better future. New Society Publishers.
  65. Muñiz, I., Garcia-López, M. À., & Calatayud, D. (2006). SPRAWL. Definición, causas y efectos. Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
  66. Nechyba, T. J., & Walsh, R. P. (2004). Urban sprawl. Journal of economic perspectives, 18(4), 177-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0895330042632681
  67. Neill, K. E., Bonser, S. P., & Pelley, J. (2003). Sprawl hurts us all: a guide to the costs of sprawl development and how to create livable communities in Ontario, A Sierra Club of Canada Report.
  68. Office Fe´ de´ ral du De´ veloppement Territorial (2000) Les Couts des Infrastructures Augmentent avec la ^ Dispersion des Constructions. Berne: Office Fe´ de´ ral du De´ veloppement Territorial, p. 12.
  69. Osman, S., Abdullah, J., & Nawawi, A. H. (2017). The financial costs of urban sprawl: Case study of Penang State. Planning Malaysia, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i2.265
  70. Osman, S., Nawawi, A. H., & Abdullah, J. (2008). Urban sprawl and its financial cost:-a conceptual framework. Asian Social Science, 4(10), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n10p39
  71. Parsipour, H., Farmihani Farahani, B. (2014). Analysis the Urban Sprawl in the Peripheral Metropolitan Areas (Case Study: Northern Peripheral Areas of Isfahan, Iran). Motaleate Shahri, 3(10), 49-62.
  72. Pattie, P. S. (1974). Impacts of urban growth on local government costs and revenues: a guide for citizens concerned with land use planning. Spec Rep Oreg State Univ Agric Exp Stn.
  73. Peterson, G.E. (2006). Land leasing and land sale as an infrastructure-financing option, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4043. Washington, DC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4043
  74. Real Estate Research Corporation (RERC) (1974). The Cost of Sprawl, Environment and Economic Costs of Alternative Residential Development Patterns at the Urban Fringe. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, p. 278.
  75. Richiedei, A., & Tira, M. (2020). Municipal Budget Management and the Generation of Urban Sprawl. A Case Study of the Lombardy Region (Italy). Planning Practice & Research, 35(2), 169-184.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1726132
  76. Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company.
  77. Sandelowski, M. (2008). Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 64(1), 104-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04813.x
  78. Sass, K. S., & Porsse, A. A. (2021). Urban sprawl and the cost of providing local public services: Empirical evidence for Brazilian municipalities. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(4), 1371-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12345
  79. Seto, K. C., & Kaufmann, R. K. (2003). Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Land Economics, 79(1), 106-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3147108
  80. Shahmohammadi, A., Taghipourzahir, A., Azizi, N., Ebrahimzadeh, I. (2018). A Critical Reflection of the Appraisal Indicators of Distance Education Systems: A Meta-Synthesis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 9(2), DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.68103
  81. Shu, C., Xie, H., Jiang, J., & Chen, Q. (2018). Is urban land development driven by economic development or fiscal revenue stimuli in China?. Land Use Policy, 77, 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.031
  82. Siedentop, S., & Fina, S. (2010). Urban sprawl beyond growth: the effect of demographic change on infrastructure costs. Flux, (1), 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/flux.079.0090
  83. Slack, E. (2002). Municipal finance and the pattern of urban growth (Vol. 160). Toronto: CD Howe Institute.
  84. Slack, E. (2006). The Impact of Municipal Finance and Governance on Urban Sprawl. Institute on Municipal Finance & Governance, Munk School of Global Affairs. University of Toronto.
  85. Snyder, K., & Bird, L. (1998). Paying the costs of sprawl: using fair-share costing to control sprawl. Smart Communities Network, 37.
  86. Sole´ -Olle´ A. (2001). Determinantes del gasto publico local: Necesidades de gasto o capacidad fiscal?. En: Revista de Economıa Aplicada, 9(25), 115–156.
  87. Sole´ -Olle´ A. and Bosch N (2005). On the Relationship between Authority Size and the Costs of Providing Local Services: Lessons for the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers in Spain. Public Finance Review 33(3), 343–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114210427270
  88. Speir, C., & Stephenson, K. (2002). Does sprawl cost us all?: Isolating the effects of housing patterns on public water and sewer costs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 56-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977191
  89. Stephenson, K., Speir, C., Shabman, L. A., & Bosch, D. J. (2001). The Influence Of Residential Development Patterns On Local Government Costs And Revenues (No. 14833). Virginia Tech, Rural Economic Analysis Program (REAP). DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14833
  90. Trubka, R., Newman, P., & Bilsborough, D. (2010). The costs of urban sprawl–Infrastructure and transportation. Environment design guide, 1-6.
  91. Varela-Candamio, L., Rubiera Morollón, F., & Sedrakyan, G. (2019). Urban sprawl and local fiscal burden: analysing the Spanish case. Empirica, 46(1), 177-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9421-y
  92. Wang, M.J., Lin, J.H., Yu, Z.X. (2010). The identification of the characteristics of the financial competition of China's local governments: does “the competition among brothers” coexist with “the controversy between the father and sons”. Manage. World 3 (25), 22–31.
  93. Wang, X., Shi, R., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Dynamics of urban sprawl and sustainable development in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70, 100736.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100736
  94. Yang, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Y. (2017). An analysis of the implications of China’s urbanization policy for economic growth and energy consumption. J. Clean. Prod, 161, 1251–1262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.207
  95. Zhang, T. (2000). Land market forces and government's role in sprawl: The case of China. Cities, 17(2), 123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00007-X
  96. Zhang, Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Interactive relationship among urban expansion, economic development, and population growth since the reform and opening up in China: An analysis based on a vector error correction model. Land, 8(10), 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land8100153