Environmentally-Friendly Behaviors among Citizens and the Relationship with moral values the Case Study of Gorgan City

Document Type : Research extracted From projects

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Department of Rural Development, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
Citizens' behavior towards the environment and their moral values in interaction with nature are among the issues that are important in the quality of urban life and sustainable viability of cities. In the present study, using stratified random sampling, Gorgan residents were examined regarding environmentally friendly behaviors and ethical values. The data collection tool was a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by face validity and reliability by Cronbach's test. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS18 software. The results showed that the pro-environmental behavior index was at a moderate level. However, women and men were not different in regards to pro-environmental behaviors. As studied people grew older, pro-environmental behavior improved, but education level did not correlate significantly. The results also showed no significant correlations between anthropocentric and theocentric orientations with the pro-environmental behaviors index. However, with strengthening ecocentric orientation, the pro-environmental behaviors decrease. These results reaffirm the gap between moral values and behavior in which behaviors have no relationship with environmental beliefs. According to the results, it is suggested that necessary facilities to reduce the cost of environmentally-friendly behaviors should be provided for citizens
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Concern about the threat to the environment by humans has become one of the most important questions of human conscience. In this regard, value and moral issues have a special place because individual and social values ​​and norms shape human behaviors. The fact is that after accepting the right attitudes towards nature and establishing the right moral relationship with it, one can unconsciously love and respect nature. Environmental ethics is a branch of applied philosophy and biological ethics that deals with humans and nature. The Greek philosopher Aristotle also believed that citizenship and morality are related subjects. Morality is from the view of the individual. Citizenship is from the perspective of the group. According to him, a person's moral character is the same set of characteristics or virtues necessary to have a good citizen. Although some have shown that the environmental behavior of citizens has become more responsible than in the past, the question is whether citizens have the right morals and environmental behaviors. Also, what connection can there be between the two? Because until the present study, no study was found about environmental ethics and environmentally-friendly behaviors in urban areas of Iran. So, this study was conducted to answer the above questions in Gorgan city.
 
Methodology
The present study was conducted by a descriptive-survey research method. The study population included residents of Gorgan who were at least 18 years old. According to the last census of 2016, the population of Gorgan was 350216 people, at least 20% of whom were under 18 years old. The number of samples was obtained 246 people using Cochran's formula, which 300 people were selected for the study to increase accuracy. Also, a stratified random sampling method was used based on the division of regions and districts of this city to select the samples in Gorgan city. According to the Gorgan Municipality, this city is divided into three districts and each district is divided into two sub-districts. By randomly selecting the citizens' houses, 50 people (100 people in each area) and a total of 300 people were randomly selected from each of the three districts of Gorgan. The data collection tool was a questionnaire. Twenty statements were used that each of them expresses action or behavior towards the environment to measure pro-environmental behaviors. Also, 19 statements were used to measure the attitude towards environmental ethics. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through face validity by obtaining the opinion of the faculty members of the Department of Environment, the Department of Agricultural Extension, and Education of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Cronbach's test was applied in a pilot study to evaluate the reliability.  The alpha value for the index of environmental behaviors was 0.724, and the environmental ethics scale was 0.731. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS18 software. Descriptive statistics, including mean, percentage, frequency, and inferential correlation coefficient statistics, including Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests, were employed.
 
Results and Discussion
The present study showed that the attitude of Gorgan residents towards the theocentric dimension of environmental ethics was the strongest and the anthropocentric dimension was the weakest. In this respect, the ecocentric dimension was in the middle position. The results showed that the attitude towards anthropocentric beliefs has decreased with increasing the level of education. Also, theocentric and ecocentric attitudes had a positive mutual effect on each other. In general, pro-environmental behaviors could be assessed at an acceptable level. Although this is not a great level, it is not a bad situation. Also, men and women were not different in terms of pro-environmental behaviors. With increasing age, the pro-environmental behaviors have improved. Besides, the level of education was not significantly related to their environmentally-friendly behaviors. The results showed that anthropocentric and theocentric dimensions did not significantly correlate with the index of pro-environmental behaviors, but this relationship was negative and significant with the attitudes towards the ecocentric dimension. In other words, pro-environmental behaviors have diminished as ecological beliefs have increased. Although pro-environmental behaviors were independent of theocentric attitudes, the significant correlation between ecocentric attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors can reinforce the possibility that concentric attitudes influence pro-environmental behaviors by strengthening ecocentric behaviors. Surprisingly, the negative and significant relationship between ecocentric attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors seems unexpected, as it was expected that people with stronger ecocentric beliefs would have more pro-environmental behaviors. It seems that something has happened here, which is called the "value-behavior" gap. 
 
Conclusion
Given the gap between environmental values ​​and behavior, changing environmental attitudes and beliefs cannot guarantee alone to enhance pro-environmental behaviors. For this purpose, situational variables are significant. Therefore, it is essential to provide the necessary conditions in a way that citizens can act following their environmental values ​​and beliefs. For example, providing garbage bins in public places. Also, the negative relationship between the level of education and the attitudes towards anthropocentric beliefs can be considered a re-emphasis on the need to provide appropriate programs to improve citizens' knowledge of the environment and avoid anthropocentric beliefs. Improving citizens' environmental knowledge and awareness can be done by using mass media such as radio and television and magazines, as well as holding environmental events. Forming environmental groups and using the cooperation and participation of citizens in cleaning the environment can also make them interested in increasing knowledge about the environment.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Highlights

  1. احمدیان، داریوش و حقیقتیان، منصور. (1395). تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی نقش عوامل فرهنگی بر رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی شهری موردمطالعه (شهروندان شهر کرمانشاه). مجله مطالعات جامعه‌شناختی شهری، 6 (18)، 76-51.
  2. هولمز، رابرت ال. (1382). مبانی فلسفه اخلاق. ترجمه مسعود علیا، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
  3. حاجی‌زاده میمندی، مسعود؛ سیارخلج، حامد و شکوهی‌فر، کاوه. (1393). بررسی عوامل فرهنگی مرتبط با رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی (موردمطالعه؛ شهر یزد). فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی- فرهنگی، 3 (1)، 32-9.
  4. حقیقتیان، منصور؛ هاشمیان‌فر، سیدعلی و احمدیان، داریوش. (1394). تحلیل جامعه‌شناسی نقش عوامل ساختاری در شکاف بین نگرش و رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی (موردمطالعه: شهروندان شهر کرمانشاه). فصلنامه مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 4 (4)، 614-593.
  5. دبیری، فرهاد؛ خلعتبری، یلدا و زارعی، سحر. (1397). دستیابی به توسعه پایدار از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست. انسان و محیط‌زیست، 16 (1)، 73-63.
  6. زارع شاه‌آبادی، اکبر؛ سیار خلج، حامد و آقا عبدالله ماهوت فروش، ستاره. (1395). عوامل مرتبط با رفتارهای حامی محیط‌زیست در محیط شهری (موردمطالعه: شهروندان شهر کرج). فصلنامه آموزش محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 5 (1)، 35-23.
  7. شهرداری گرگان. (1398). مشخصات عمومی شهر گرگان. قابل‌دسترسی در: http://www.gorgan.ir/moshakhasat-shahri.html
  8. صالحی، سعید؛ چیذری، محمد؛ صدیقی، حسن و بیژنی، مسعود. (1396). تأثیر باورهای زیست‌محیطی بر رفتار پایدار کشاورزان استان فارس در بهره‌برداری از منابع آب زیرزمینی. مجله علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 13(1)، 193-175.
  9. صفا، لیلا؛ منگلی، نسرین و گنج حانلو، محمدمهدی. (1396). عوامل تأثیرگذار بر رفتار حفاظت محیط‌زیستی روستاییان در شهرستان خدابنده بر مبنای تئوری رفتار برنامه‌ریزی‌شده. فصلنامه آموزش محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 6 (2)، 81-69.
  10. ضیاءپور، آرش؛ کیانی‌پور، ندا و نیک‌بخت، محمدرضا. (1392). تحلیل جامعه‌شناسی محیط‌زیست و رفتار افراد نسبت به آن در مناطق روستایی و شهری استان کرمانشاه. فصلنامه آموزش محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 1 (2)،67-55.
  11. عابدی سروستانی، احمد. (1394). ارزش‌ها و رفتارهای دوستدار محیط‌زیست: مطالعه‌ای در پارک‌های جنگلی استان گلستان. فصلنامه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، 26 (3)، 342-329.
  12. عابدی سروستانی، احمد؛ شاه‌ولی، منصور و محقق‌داماد، سید مصطفی. (1391). مبانی و رهیافت‌های اخلاق زیست‌محیطی. چاپ اول، تهران: موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران و انجمن حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
  13. عابدی سروستانی، احمد و شاه‌ولی، منصور. (1391). تعامل انسان با طبیعت: یک واکاوی هنجاری. فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی، 27 (4)، 32-1.
  14. عابدی سروستانی، احمد. (1388). بررسی دیدگاه‌های اخلاق زیست‌محیطی دانشجویان و استادان دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان. گزارش طرح پژوهشی شماره 204-3-88، معاونت پژوهشی و فناوری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان.
  15. عابدی سروستانی، احمد و شاه‌ولی، منصور. (1388). نقش ترویج کشاورزی در ارتقاء اخلاق زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان. فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 4 (1/2)، 130-120.
  16. عابدی سروستانی، احمد. (1387). تبیین نظریه اخلاق زیست‌محیطی دانشجویان و استادان دانشگاه شیراز. پایان‌نامه دکتری ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، استاد راهنما: منصور شاه‌ولی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز.
  17. عابدی سروستانی، احمد و شاه‌ولی، منصور. (1387). ضرورت و ویژگی‌های پژوهش در اخلاق زیست‌محیطی. فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 3 (3/4)، 61-56.
  18. علوی، سیدعلی؛ مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ کرمی، جلال؛ چوقی‌کمکی، بایرام و نشاط، عبدالحمید. (1398). تحلیل فرآیندهای محلی در پراکنش فضایی شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر گرگان). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 51 (4)، 851-825.
  19. فاضلی، محمد و جعفرصالحی، سحر. (1392). شکاف نگرش، دانش و رفتار زیست‌محیطی گردشگران. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگران، 8 (22)، 147-136.
  20. فردوسی سیما؛ مرتضوی شهناز و رضوانی نعیمه. (1386). رابطه بین دانش زیست‌محیطی و رفتارهای محافظت از محیط. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی، 53، 266-253.
  21. کیانی‌سلمی، صدیقه و شاطریان، محسن. (1396). شناسایی عوامل اجتماعی-فرهنگی موثر بر حفظ محیط‌زیست (مطالعه موردی: شهروندان کاشان). فصلنامه آموزش محیطزیست و توسعه پایدار، 6 (2)، 116-101.
  22. گلشیری اصفهانی، زهرا و سرایی، محمدحسین. (1389). برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی نظام زیست‌محیطی روستا با تجزیه‌وتحلیل SWOT (مطالعه موردی: بخش گندمان، شهرستان بروجن). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های روستایی، 1 (4)، 98-73.
  23. محقق‌داماد، سید مصطفی (1380). الهیات محیط‌زیست. نامه فرهنگستان علوم، 6 (17)، 30-7.
  24. مختاری ملک‌آبادی، رضا؛ عبداللهی، عظیمه السادات و صادقی، حمیدرضا. (1393). تحلیل و بازشناسی رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر اصفهان، سال 1391). مجله پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 5 (18)، 20-1.
  25. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان گلستان. (1395) نتایج سرشماری سال 1395. قابل‌دسترسی در:
    1. http://amar.golestanmporg.ir/file-natayej-sarshomari1395.html
  26. منتی‌زاده، میثم؛ زمانی، غلامحسین و غلامرضایی، سعید. (1394). واکاوی هنجارهای اخلاقی زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان: موردمطالعه کشاورزان شهرستان شیراز. مجله علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 11 (2)، 65-49.
  27. مهرآرا، اسدالله؛ مدانلو جویباری، سپیده و زارع زیدی، علیرضا. (1397). بررسی نقش حفاظت از محیط‌زیست در توسعه پایدار. فصلنامه مطالعات کاربردی در علوم مدیریت و توسعه، 3 (2)، 116-105.
  1. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. & Shahvali, M. (2008) Ecology and ethics: Some relationships for nature conservation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 715-718.
  2. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2008) Explaining the Environmental Ethics Theory of Shiraz University Students and Academics. PhD Thesis, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University. [In Persian].
  3. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2009). Investigating environmental ethics views of students and academics of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Research Report (No. 204-3-88), Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. [In Persian].
  4. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2015). Pro-environmental values and behaviors: A study in Golestan forest parks. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 26(3), 329-342. [In Persian].
  5. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2008). Ecology and ethics: Some relationships for nature conservation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 715-718.
  6. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2008). Necessity and characteristics of research in environmental ethics. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 3 (3,4), 56-61. [In Persian].
  7. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2009). The role of agricultural extension in promoting environmental ethics of farmers. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 4 (1,2), 120-130. [In Persian].
  8. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2012). Human-nature interaction: A normative analysis. Geographical Research, 7(4), 1-32. [In Persian].
  9. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., Shahvali, M., & Mohaghegh-Damad, S.M. (2012). Principles and Approaches to Environmental Ethics. Tehran: Iranian Philosophy and Philosophy Research Institute and Iranian Philosophy and Philosophy Society. [In Persian].
  10. Ahmadian, D., & Haghighatian, M. (2016). Sociological analysis of the role of cultural factors on the urban environmental behaviors (case study Kermanshah citizens). Journal of Urban Sociological Studies, 6 (18), 51-76. [In Persian].
  11. Alavi, S., Meshkini, A., Karami, J., Choughi Komaki, B. & Neshat, A. (2019). Analysis of local processes in urban spatial distribution (Case study: Gorgan city). Human Geography Research, 51(4), 825-851. [In Persian].
  12. Bagheri, D., Mohseni, R.A., & Sadegh-Mahdavi, S.M. (2018). Association of socioeconomic status and pro-environmental behaviors in the citizens of Gorgan, Iran. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal, 6 (1), 33-43.
  13. Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, S. (2003). Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Environment and Behavior, 35, 264-285.
  14. Barr, S. (2006). Environmental action in the home: Investigating the 'value-action' gap. Geography, 91 (1), 43-54.
  15. Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, B.P. (1999) The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes towards large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 415-421.
  16. Booth, C. (2009). A motivational turn for environmental ethics. Ethics and the Environment, 14 (1), 53-78.
  17. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T.J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1075-1095.
  18. Bronfman, N., Cisternas, P., López-Vázquez, E., Maza, C., & Oyanedel, J. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7, 14133-14152.
  19. Burkhrdt, J., Comstock, G., Hartel, P.G., & Thompson, P.B. (2005). Agricultural Ethics. Iowa: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.
  20. (2001). Environmental citizenship. Available at: http://www.cep.unt.edu/citizen.htm.
  21. Dabiri, F., Khalatbari, Y., & Zarei, S. (2018). Achieving sustainable development from the perspective of international environmental law. Human and Environment, 16 (1), 73-63. [In Persian].
  22. De Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354.
  23. Deniz S.O., Wiernik, B.M., Dilchert, S., & Klein, R. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). pp. 82-88.
  24. Deputy of Statistics and Information of Golestan Province. (2016). Census results for 2016. Available at: http://amar.golestanmporg.ir/file-natayej-sarshomari1395.html. [In Persian].
  25. Fairweather, J.R., Maslin, C., & Simmons, D.G. (2005). Environmental values and response to ecolables among international visitors to New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13 (1), pp. 82-98.
  26. Fazeli, M., & Jafar-Salih, S. (2013) Gaps in attitude, knowledge and environmental behavior of tourists. Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 8 (22), 136-147. [In Persian].
  27. Ferdowsi, S., Mortazavi, S., & Razvani, N. (2007). The relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental protection behaviors. Journal of Humanities, 53, 253-266. [In Persian].
  28. Frick, J., Kaiser, F.G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1-27.
  29. Gebert, A. (2014). Recycling in dubrovink: discrepancies between attitudes, knowledge and behavior. RIThink, 4, 25-29.
  30. Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541-549.
  31. Golshiri-Isfahani, Z., & Saraei, M.H. (2010). Strategic planning of rural environmental system by SWOT analysis (case study: Gandman district, Borujen city). Journal of Rural Research, 1 (4), 73-98. [In Persian].
  32. Gorgan Municipality. (2019). General Specifications of Gorgan City. Available at: http://www.gorgan.ir/moshakhasat-shahri.html.
  33. Gutierrez, D. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and behavior, 29 (1), 111-133.
  34. Haghighatyan, M., Hashemianfar, A., & Ahmadian, D. (2015). Sociological analysis of the role of structural factors in the gap between attitude and environmental behaviors (case study: citizens of Kermanshah). Iranian Journal of Social Studies and Research, 4 (4), 593-614. [In Persian].
  35. Hajizadeh-Meymandi, M., Sayyar-Khalaj, H., & Shokouhifar, K. (2014). Investigation of cultural factors related to environmental behaviors (case study: Yazd city). Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies, 3 (3), 9-32. [In Persian].
  36. Holmes, R.L. (2003). Basic Moral Philosophy. Translation: Masoud Olya. Tehran: Qhoghnous Publications. [In Persian].
  37. Kaltenborn, B.P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). Association between environmental value orientations and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1-11.
  38. Kassiola, J.J. (2003). Can environmental ethics solve environmental problems and save the world? Yes, but first we must recognize the essential normative nature of environmental problems. Environmental Values, 12 (4), 489-514.
  39. Kiani-Salmi, F., & Shaterian, M. (2018) Identifying socio-cultural factors affecting environmental protection (case study: Kashan citizens). Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 6 (2), 101-116. [In Persian].
  40. Lee, Y.K., Kim, S., Kim, M.S. & Choi, J.G. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2009-2015.
  41. Mappin, M.J., & Johnson, E.A. (2005). Changing perspectives of ecology and education in environmental education. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education (pp.1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Mehrara, A., Medanlou-Jouibari, S.A., & Zare-Zaidi, A. (2018). Investigating the role of environmental protection in sustainable development. Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 10, 105-116. [In Persian].
  43. Menatizadeh, M., Zamani, G.H., & Gholam-Rezai, S. (2015). Investigating the environmental ethical norms of farmers: A case study of farmers in Shiraz County. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 11 (2), 49-65. [In Persian].
  44. Milfont, L.T. & Duckitt, J. (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first – and second – order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (3), 289-303.
  45. Mohaghegh-Damad, S.M. (2001) Environmental theology. Academy of Sciences Letters, 6 )17(,7-30. [In Persian].
  46. Mokhtari-Malekabadi, R., Abdollahi, A.S., & Sadeghi, H.R. (2013) Analysis and recognition of urban environmental behaviors (case study: Isfahan city, 2012). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 5 (18), 1-20. [In Persian].
  47. Motavalli, J. (2002). Stewards of the earth. The Environmental Magazine, 13 (6), 2-11.
  48. Nordlund, A.M. & Garvill, J. (2003) Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347.
  49. Pallet, H. (2017). The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Editors: Michael Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Weidong Liu and Dick Marston, Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree. London: Wiley Blackwell.
  50. Poortinga, W. & Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2004) Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36 (1), 70-93.
  51. Price, J.C. & Leviston, Z. (2014) Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: the social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 65-78.
  52. Safa, L., Salahi-Moghaddam, N., & Ganji-Khanlo, M.M. (2017). Modeling of environmental protection of villagers based on value-belief-norm theory (case study: Khodabandeh city). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 13 (2), 91-108. [In Persian].
  53. Schultz, P.W., & Kaiser, F.G. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In: S.D. Clyton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp.556-580). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  54. Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
  55. Schwartz, S.H., & Howard, J.A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton (Ed.), Altruism and Helping Behaviour: Social, Personality and Developmental Perspectives (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  56. Scott, B.A., Amel, E.L., Koger, S.M., & Manning, C.M. (2015). Psychology for sustainability. New York: Routledge.
  57. Smith-Sebasto, N.J., & D’Costa, A. (1995). Designing a Likert type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. Journal of Environmental Education, 27 (1), 14-20.
  58. Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 407-424.
  59. Tucker, M.E., & Grim, J. (2001). Series forward. In: John A. Grim (Ed.), Indigenous Traditions and Ecology, (pp. xv-xxxii). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  60. Vaske, J.J., & Donnelly, M.P. (1999). A value–attitude–behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 523­537.
  61. Vaske, J.J., Williams, D.R., & Jonker, S. (2001). Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 761-776.
  62. Yang, T. (2006). Towards an egalitarian global environmental ethics. In: Henk A.M.J. ten Have (Ed.), Environmental Ethics and International Policy (pp.23-45). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
  63. Zare-Shahabad, A., Sayyar-Khalaj, H., & Mahootfroosh, A.S. (2016) Factors related to environmental behaviors in urban environment (case study: citizens of Karaj). Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 5 (1), 23-35. [In Persian].
  64. Ziapour, A., Kianipur, N., & Nikbakht, M.R. (2013). Sociological analysis of environment and individulals behavior in rural and urban areas of Kermanshah province. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 1 (2), 55-67. [In Persian].
  65. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday proenvironmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126-138.

Keywords


  1. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. & Shahvali, M. (2008) Ecology and ethics: Some relationships for nature conservation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 715-718.
  2. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2008) Explaining the Environmental Ethics Theory of Shiraz University Students and Academics. PhD Thesis, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University. [In Persian].
  3. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2009). Investigating environmental ethics views of students and academics of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Research Report (No. 204-3-88), Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. [In Persian].
  4. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. (2015). Pro-environmental values and behaviors: A study in Golestan forest parks. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 26(3), 329-342. [In Persian].
  5. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2008). Ecology and ethics: Some relationships for nature conservation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 715-718.
  6. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2008). Necessity and characteristics of research in environmental ethics. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 3 (3,4), 56-61. [In Persian].
  7. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2009). The role of agricultural extension in promoting environmental ethics of farmers. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 4 (1,2), 120-130. [In Persian].
  8. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2012). Human-nature interaction: A normative analysis. Geographical Research, 7(4), 1-32. [In Persian].
  9. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., Shahvali, M., & Mohaghegh-Damad, S.M. (2012). Principles and Approaches to Environmental Ethics. Tehran: Iranian Philosophy and Philosophy Research Institute and Iranian Philosophy and Philosophy Society. [In Persian].
  10. Ahmadian, D., & Haghighatian, M. (2016). Sociological analysis of the role of cultural factors on the urban environmental behaviors (case study Kermanshah citizens). Journal of Urban Sociological Studies, 6 (18), 51-76. [In Persian].
  11. Alavi, S., Meshkini, A., Karami, J., Choughi Komaki, B. & Neshat, A. (2019). Analysis of local processes in urban spatial distribution (Case study: Gorgan city). Human Geography Research, 51(4), 825-851. [In Persian].
  12. Bagheri, D., Mohseni, R.A., & Sadegh-Mahdavi, S.M. (2018). Association of socioeconomic status and pro-environmental behaviors in the citizens of Gorgan, Iran. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal, 6 (1), 33-43.
  13. Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, S. (2003). Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Environment and Behavior, 35, 264-285.
  14. Barr, S. (2006). Environmental action in the home: Investigating the 'value-action' gap. Geography, 91 (1), 43-54.
  15. Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, B.P. (1999) The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes towards large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 415-421.
  16. Booth, C. (2009). A motivational turn for environmental ethics. Ethics and the Environment, 14 (1), 53-78.
  17. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T.J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1075-1095.
  18. Bronfman, N., Cisternas, P., López-Vázquez, E., Maza, C., & Oyanedel, J. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7, 14133-14152.
  19. Burkhrdt, J., Comstock, G., Hartel, P.G., & Thompson, P.B. (2005). Agricultural Ethics. Iowa: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.
  20. (2001). Environmental citizenship. Available at: http://www.cep.unt.edu/citizen.htm.
  21. Dabiri, F., Khalatbari, Y., & Zarei, S. (2018). Achieving sustainable development from the perspective of international environmental law. Human and Environment, 16 (1), 73-63. [In Persian].
  22. De Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354.
  23. Deniz S.O., Wiernik, B.M., Dilchert, S., & Klein, R. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). pp. 82-88.
  24. Deputy of Statistics and Information of Golestan Province. (2016). Census results for 2016. Available at: http://amar.golestanmporg.ir/file-natayej-sarshomari1395.html. [In Persian].
  25. Fairweather, J.R., Maslin, C., & Simmons, D.G. (2005). Environmental values and response to ecolables among international visitors to New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13 (1), pp. 82-98.
  26. Fazeli, M., & Jafar-Salih, S. (2013) Gaps in attitude, knowledge and environmental behavior of tourists. Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 8 (22), 136-147. [In Persian].
  27. Ferdowsi, S., Mortazavi, S., & Razvani, N. (2007). The relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental protection behaviors. Journal of Humanities, 53, 253-266. [In Persian].
  28. Frick, J., Kaiser, F.G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1-27.
  29. Gebert, A. (2014). Recycling in dubrovink: discrepancies between attitudes, knowledge and behavior. RIThink, 4, 25-29.
  30. Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541-549.
  31. Golshiri-Isfahani, Z., & Saraei, M.H. (2010). Strategic planning of rural environmental system by SWOT analysis (case study: Gandman district, Borujen city). Journal of Rural Research, 1 (4), 73-98. [In Persian].
  32. Gorgan Municipality. (2019). General Specifications of Gorgan City. Available at: http://www.gorgan.ir/moshakhasat-shahri.html.
  33. Gutierrez, D. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and behavior, 29 (1), 111-133.
  34. Haghighatyan, M., Hashemianfar, A., & Ahmadian, D. (2015). Sociological analysis of the role of structural factors in the gap between attitude and environmental behaviors (case study: citizens of Kermanshah). Iranian Journal of Social Studies and Research, 4 (4), 593-614. [In Persian].
  35. Hajizadeh-Meymandi, M., Sayyar-Khalaj, H., & Shokouhifar, K. (2014). Investigation of cultural factors related to environmental behaviors (case study: Yazd city). Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies, 3 (3), 9-32. [In Persian].
  36. Holmes, R.L. (2003). Basic Moral Philosophy. Translation: Masoud Olya. Tehran: Qhoghnous Publications. [In Persian].
  37. Kaltenborn, B.P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). Association between environmental value orientations and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1-11.
  38. Kassiola, J.J. (2003). Can environmental ethics solve environmental problems and save the world? Yes, but first we must recognize the essential normative nature of environmental problems. Environmental Values, 12 (4), 489-514.
  39. Kiani-Salmi, F., & Shaterian, M. (2018) Identifying socio-cultural factors affecting environmental protection (case study: Kashan citizens). Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 6 (2), 101-116. [In Persian].
  40. Lee, Y.K., Kim, S., Kim, M.S. & Choi, J.G. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2009-2015.
  41. Mappin, M.J., & Johnson, E.A. (2005). Changing perspectives of ecology and education in environmental education. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education (pp.1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Mehrara, A., Medanlou-Jouibari, S.A., & Zare-Zaidi, A. (2018). Investigating the role of environmental protection in sustainable development. Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 10, 105-116. [In Persian].
  43. Menatizadeh, M., Zamani, G.H., & Gholam-Rezai, S. (2015). Investigating the environmental ethical norms of farmers: A case study of farmers in Shiraz County. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 11 (2), 49-65. [In Persian].
  44. Milfont, L.T. & Duckitt, J. (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first – and second – order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (3), 289-303.
  45. Mohaghegh-Damad, S.M. (2001) Environmental theology. Academy of Sciences Letters, 6 )17(,7-30. [In Persian].
  46. Mokhtari-Malekabadi, R., Abdollahi, A.S., & Sadeghi, H.R. (2013) Analysis and recognition of urban environmental behaviors (case study: Isfahan city, 2012). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 5 (18), 1-20. [In Persian].
  47. Motavalli, J. (2002). Stewards of the earth. The Environmental Magazine, 13 (6), 2-11.
  48. Nordlund, A.M. & Garvill, J. (2003) Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347.
  49. Pallet, H. (2017). The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Editors: Michael Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Weidong Liu and Dick Marston, Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree. London: Wiley Blackwell.
  50. Poortinga, W. & Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2004) Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36 (1), 70-93.
  51. Price, J.C. & Leviston, Z. (2014) Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: the social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 65-78.
  52. Safa, L., Salahi-Moghaddam, N., & Ganji-Khanlo, M.M. (2017). Modeling of environmental protection of villagers based on value-belief-norm theory (case study: Khodabandeh city). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 13 (2), 91-108. [In Persian].
  53. Schultz, P.W., & Kaiser, F.G. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In: S.D. Clyton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp.556-580). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  54. Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
  55. Schwartz, S.H., & Howard, J.A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton (Ed.), Altruism and Helping Behaviour: Social, Personality and Developmental Perspectives (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  56. Scott, B.A., Amel, E.L., Koger, S.M., & Manning, C.M. (2015). Psychology for sustainability. New York: Routledge.
  57. Smith-Sebasto, N.J., & D’Costa, A. (1995). Designing a Likert type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. Journal of Environmental Education, 27 (1), 14-20.
  58. Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 407-424.
  59. Tucker, M.E., & Grim, J. (2001). Series forward. In: John A. Grim (Ed.), Indigenous Traditions and Ecology, (pp. xv-xxxii). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  60. Vaske, J.J., & Donnelly, M.P. (1999). A value–attitude–behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 523­537.
  61. Vaske, J.J., Williams, D.R., & Jonker, S. (2001). Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 761-776.
  62. Yang, T. (2006). Towards an egalitarian global environmental ethics. In: Henk A.M.J. ten Have (Ed.), Environmental Ethics and International Policy (pp.23-45). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
  63. Zare-Shahabad, A., Sayyar-Khalaj, H., & Mahootfroosh, A.S. (2016) Factors related to environmental behaviors in urban environment (case study: citizens of Karaj). Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 5 (1), 23-35. [In Persian].
  64. Ziapour, A., Kianipur, N., & Nikbakht, M.R. (2013). Sociological analysis of environment and individulals behavior in rural and urban areas of Kermanshah province. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 1 (2), 55-67. [In Persian].
  65. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday proenvironmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126-138.