Sustainable city

Sustainable city

Evaluation of the effects of natural hazards on the physical structure of cities: the case study of New city of Lar

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Geography, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran
2 Department of Geography, Larestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Larestan, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2024.363310.1652
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
Lar city witnessed a 6.1 Richter earthquake in 1960, which destroyed the city. Today, this city is the largest residential center of Larestan, with two dynamic parts of the old city in the northwest of the Lar plain and the new city after the destruction caused by the earthquake, located on the Tangeh Asad alluvial cone in the south of the plain. The research aims to investigate the physical vulnerability of old and new cities against earthquakes with macro and micro indicators and an analytical comparison of these two parts of the city. The statistical population of the research is the entire area, including all the neighborhoods of the old and new city of Lar. Data collection was done in the form of a field library, and the main data was collected from the Statistics Center and Lar Municipality census data. The analysis of the data was also carried out by weighting the indicators with the help of the Delphi technique and measuring importance with the opinion of experts, then weighting was done with the help of hierarchical models, and finally, with the data in the GIS software, maps of the vulnerability of the indicators and the final map of vulnerability were obtained. The results show that the level of vulnerability is very different among the localities, and the factors involved in these localities and the entire city are not equally effective, various reasons played a role in them, including the physical factors of the building and environmental physical factors, including services. The basic infrastructure of the city, including medical and health spaces. Examining the vulnerability indicators indicates that we need a strong and efficient management and organizational solution, as well as physical and environmental solutions, to reduce the vulnerability and increase the resilience of the city.
Extended abstract
Introduction
Earthquake is one of the strongest natural hazards that has always caused significant human and economic losses to urban areas. According to its geographical and geological location, Iran is among the ten most earthquake-prone countries in the world. This multiplies the issue of attention to vulnerability in the country. The physical and environmental vulnerability of cities and residential areas against natural hazards is considered very important, and due to adaptation to the rapidly changing world, having an environment that can respond to these hazards and have the necessary resilience is meaningful and essential. Urban form and body consist of macro and microelements. The macro-level elements are related to the overall structure and size of the city, the type of development, the population distribution pattern, and the degree of clustering, and the micro-level elements are related to the design and arrangement of elements such as buildings, open spaces, blocks, neighborhoods, and streets. Together, both form the city's physical-environmental complex, and both are vulnerable to natural hazards. Therefore, for the resilience of the whole city, attention should be paid to the details of each macro and microelement.
 
Methodology
The current research is a type of user research that seeks to solve the problem of reducing the effects of natural hazards, especially earthquakes in Lar city. In terms of the nature of descriptive research, it is an analysis whose purpose is to know the obvious and hidden angles of the damage caused to the city of Lar due to the earthquake. In order to evaluate the main goal of the research, a large number of indicators were extracted using the content analysis of previous studies, and 4 macro indicators and 11 sub-indices were selected for the study through a survey of professors. By selecting the final indicators of their data from the statistics center, the detailed and comprehensive plan and the municipality of the area were collected and prepared in the form of GIS software to analyze the vulnerability of the city. In order to analyze the obtained data, we started by weighting the indicators and determining their impact on the vulnerability caused by the earthquake. For this purpose, the hierarchical analysis model was used. Finally, all the obtained layers were combined using the Raster Calculator technique, and Lar city's final physical vulnerability map was extracted. The Natural Breaks technique has also been used to classify the final physical vulnerability map and the maps related to each criterion.
 
Results and discussion
Lar, located in Fars province, is located after the 4th earthquake of May 1960 on the 6.1 Richter scale, which is still considered one of Iran's most powerful earthquakes. Although 6 decades have passed since the earthquake and the formation of a new city, an evaluation is needed to determine the level of physical vulnerability against the earthquake. According to the general division of Lar city, the old city is located in the north of Lar plain with 8 neighborhoods with an area of approximately 8 square kilometers and the new city with an area of about 12 square kilometers and 18 neighborhoods in the south. The research results indicate that out of 8 neighborhoods in the old city, 1 neighborhood with 40%is exposed to very high damage and 4 neighborhoods with 27% are exposed to moderate damage. In the new city, 7 neighborhoods with about 48% are exposed to moderate damage, 7 neighborhoods with 25% are exposed to low damage, and 1 neighborhood with 12% is exposed to high damage, which is unacceptable for the new city with a little history. Also, 40% of the old and new city of Lar is exposed to very high damage, 37% is exposed to moderate damage, and 2% is exposed to very low damage. Considering the history of earthquakes in the area, this is very worrying for the city and requires careful and efficient management before the crisis.
 
Conclusion
Regarding the physical vulnerability of the city against earthquakes, there are still various influential topics which are different in different cities.  Lar also consists of two parts, new and old, so each has its physical characteristics. According to the studies of this research, in the old city, the effective factors in the very high degree of vulnerability, in the order of the first rank in building strength factors, include the following elements as the type of skeleton and materials, the age of the building with 78% of the entire area of the old city texture; the second rank of density factors including the elements as population density, residential density, the granularity of units with 58% of the entire area of the old city texture; the third rank of accessibility factors including the elements as local roads and main roads with 40% of the entire area of the old city texture; and finally, the fourth rank of basic service factors including elements as therapeutic spaces, green and open spaces, temporary accommodation and educational spaces with 39% of the entire area of the old city texture medium vulnerability were the sum of factors and elements that contributed to the vulnerability of the old city. These factors had different effects in the new city, which are the first rank of basic service factors including elements as therapeutic spaces, green and open spaces, temporary accommodation and educational spaces with 48% of the total area of the new city; the second rank of density factors including elements as population density, residential density, unit granularity with 31% of the total area of the new city texture; the third rank of building strength factors including elements as type of skeleton and materials, the age of the building with 29% of the entire area of the new city texture; and the fourth rank of accessibility factors including elements as local roads and main roads with 23% of the total area of the new city have been effective in the vulnerable level of the city. In order to reduce the vulnerability of the city, one should look for solutions before the crisis, which can be rooted in managerial and physical solutions.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

  1. Abdul, L., & Yu, T. F. (2020). Resilient urbanization: a systematic review on urban discourse in Pakistan. Urban Science, 4(4), 76.
  2. Abdulahi, M. (2012). crisis management in urban areas. Organization of municipalities and villages of the country. [In Persian]
  3. Ahdanjad Roshti, M., Zulfi, A., Nowrozi, M., & Jalili, K. (2012) Assessing the social vulnerability of cities against earthquakes (case example of Khorramdare city. Zagros perspective geography and urban planning chapter, 3(7). 81-97. [In Persian]
  4. Arabullah Firouz Jah, A. (2013). The role of comprehensive and detailed urban development plans in reducing the vulnerability of Babol city from earthquakes. Master's thesis of the Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian]
  5. Armaş, I., Dragos,T-D., Radu,I., Alexandru, G. (2017). Vulnerability to earthquake hazard: ucharest case study, Romania. International journal of disaster risk science, 8(2), 182-195
  6. Aslani, F. (2018). Understanding, analyzing and reducing the vulnerability to earthquakes (case study of east Golestan neighborhood unit: Tehran district 22). Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (DPMIK), 8(3), 241-254.
  7. Azad Khani, P., Hosseinzadeh, J., & Saidi, R. (2018). Identifying and determining the appropriate zones of environmental hazards effective in the physical development of Ilam city. Natural Environmental Hazards Journal, (23), 19-40. [In Persian]
  8. Azimi, A., Faraji Melai, A., & Lotfi, A. (2001). Spatial analysis of air relief sites during earthquakes (Case: Babol city). Specialized Journal of Spatial Planning, 1 (2), 67-82. [In Persian]
  9. Basaglia, A., Aprile, A., Spacone, E., Pelà, L. (2020). Assessing community resilience, housing recovery and impact of mitigation strategies at the urban scale: a case study after the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(13), 6039-6074
  10. Bhandari, A. & Regmi, D. (2015). “A very weak homes”, Kathmandu, available at: www.ekantipur. com/kantipur/2072/2
  11. Bloom, D., Channhing, D., & Fink, G. (2008). Urbanization and the Wealth of Nations. Harvard Initiative for Global Health.
  12. Borden, K., Schmidtlein, M., Emrich, C., Piegorsch, W., & Cutter, S. (2007). Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 4(2),1-21.
  13. Bottero, M., Datola, G., & De Angelis, E. (2020) A system dynamics model and analytic network process: an integrated approach to investigate urban resilience. Land 9(8), 2-42
  14. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). (2020). EM-DAT. The International Disaster Database. Available online: https://www.emdat.be/ (accessed on 1 April 2020).
  15. Chunliang, X., Cheng, L., Song, W., & Wu, W. (2011). Vulnerability of Large City and Its Implication in Urban Planning: A Perspective of Intraurban Structure. Chin. Geogra. Sci. 21(2), 204-210.
  16. Dadbood, A., & Zangiabadi, A. (2019). Prioritization of effective factors on vulnerable areas of physical texture of Gorgan city, Iran. Geographical Researches, 34(3), 369-376. [In Persian]
  17. Dehghani, A., Alidadi, M., & Sharifi, A. (2022). Compact Development Policy and Urban Resilience: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 14(19), 11798.
  18. Deshkar, S., & Adane, V. (2016). Community resilience approach for prioritizing infrastructure development in urban areas. In Urban disasters and resilience in Asia (. 245-267). Butterworth-Heinemann.
  19. Duzgun H. S. B. (2011). An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas. Nat Hazards, 59, 917–947
  20. Emel, J., & Peer, R. (1989). Resource management and natural hazards, In Peet, R. and Thrift, N. (EDS) New models in geography, 1, 49-76. Unwin and Hyman, London.
  21. Falahi, A., & Hosni, A. (2019) article titled Physical Vulnerability Assessment of the New City of Hashtgerd against a Possible Earthquake. Geographical Research Quarterly, 35 (4) 306-293. [In Persian]
  22. Gencer, E., Folorunsho, R., Linkin, M., Wang, X., Natenzon, C. E., Wajih, S., & Solecki, W. (2018). Disasters and risk in cities.
  23. Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural hazards review, 4(3), 136-143.
  24. Goswami, S., Chakraborty, S., Ghosh, S., Chakrabarti, A., & Chakraborty, B. (2018). A review on application of data mining techniques to combat natural disasters. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(3), 365-378.‌
  25. Gulati, B. (2018). Earthquake Risk Assessment of Buildings Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun. India, Unpublished MS Thesis, ITC, the Netherlands.
  26. Hajinejad, A., Badali, A., & Aghaei, V. (2016). The survey effective factors in vulnerability due earthquake in informal district of city zones with application of GIS, case study: 1 and 5 zones of Tabriz. Journal of Natural Environment Hazards, 4(6), 33-56. [In Persian]
  27. Hamidi, A. R., Zeng, Z., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Household vulnerability to floods and cyclones in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 46, 101496. [In Persian]
  28. Hewitt, K. (1983). Interpretation of calamity, Allen and Unwin. Boston and London.
  29. Honkzahi, M. A., & Fani, Z. (2018) in research on reducing the effects of natural hazards (earthquake) on urban environment with emphasis on capacity building (case study: Zahedan city). Earth Science Research, 10 (39), 191-213. [In Persian]
  30. Huang, C. N., Liou, J. J., & Chuang, Y. C. 2014. A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures. Knowledge-Based Systems, 55, 66-74.
  31. Juchimiuk, J., & Januszkiewicz, K. (2019). Envisioning infrastructure to reduce disaster’s impact to cities during the climate change area being elements of smart cities. IOP Conference Series.Earth and Environmental Science, 214(1) doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/214/1/012141
  32. Juha I. Uitto. (1998). the geographt of disaster vulnerability in megacities. Applied Geograghy. 18(1), 7-16
  33. Kurnio, H., Fekete, A., Naz, F., Norf, C., & Jüpner, R. (2021). Resilience learning and indigenous knowledge of earthquake risk in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 62, 102423.
  34. Martinho, B., & Reis, J. (2022). United Nations (UN) disaster risk reduction framework: case study of the Portuguese army on UN challenges in the context of sustainable risk mitigation. Sustainability, 14(3), 18-34.‌
  35. Meshkini, A., Bozorgvar, A., & Alipour, S. (2024). Spatial analysis of the physical resilience of old urban neighborhoods against earthquakes: a case study of the old texture of Tehran. GeoJournal, 89, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11101-x
  36. Meshkini, A., Mansourzadeh, A. M., Shahrokhi Far, Z., & Mousavi, S. Sh. (2018). measuring the spatial distribution pattern of social vulnerability - urban body in natural hazards, a case study: Haft District of Tehran Municipality. Analysis Journal Space of environmental hazards, 3 (6) 49-70. [In Persian]
  37. Meshkini, A., Quaid Rahmati, S., & Shabanzadeh Namini, R. (2013). Vulnerability analysis of urban tissue against earthquakes (study area: Tehran two municipality area). Human Geography Research, 46(4), 843-856. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51226. [In Persian]
  38. Mobaraki, O., & Kashani Asl, A. (2014). The role of urban planning in crisis management with an emphasis on earthquakes case study of Ahar city). International Journal of Basic Science & Applied Research, 3, 256-263. [In Persian]
  39. Mohabati, M., & Astelazhi, A. (2018). Evaluation of physical-economic and environmental factors affecting the vulnerability analysis of urban space against earthquakes with a non-factorial defense approach (Case study: District 5 of Shahrari, District 20 of Tehran). Journal of Applied Science Research) Geography, 22 (65), 171-157. [In Persian]
  40. Mohammadi, A., Ashouri, K., & Robati, M. (2017). Evaluating the components of instutional and social resilience in urban spontaneous settlements, case study: Naisar separated urban district in Sanandaj. Journal of Urban Studies, 6(22), 75-88. [In Persian]
  41. Mubasheri, M., Anuri, M. R., & Miri, S. G. R. (2021). Analysis and prioritization of effective factors in reducing the vulnerability of cities from natural hazards Case study: Zabul city. Geography and Regional Planning Quarterly, 11 (3), 697-713. [In Persian]
  42. Narjabadifam, P., Noori, M., Taciroglu, E., Zhang, J., Khoshnevis, B., Cardone, D.,... Orlando Fabio, S. (2022). Sustainable Earthquake Resilience with the Versatile Shape Memory Alloy (SMA)-Based
  43. Negaresh, H. (2005). Earthquakes, cities and faults. Geographical Research Quarterly Journal. 37(1), 34-51.
  44. Nirupama, N., Adhikari, I., & Sheybani, A. (2014). Natural hazards in Ontario, Canada: an analysis for resilience building. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 55-61.
  45. Peng, Y. (2012). Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods. Ann Oper Res.
  46. Qadiri, M., & Roknuddin, A. (2013). the relationship between the social structure of cities and the degree of vulnerability to the risk of earthquakes, a case study of neighborhoods in the metropolis of Tehran. Geography and Environmental Planning, 24 (2),153-174. [In Persian]
  47. Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Urbanization. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization' [Online Resource]
  48. Rumbach, A. (2014). Do new towns increase disaster risk? Evidence from Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 43,117-124.
  49. Rutgersson, A., Kjellström, E., Haapala, J., Stendel, M., Danilovich, I., Drews, M., Wasmund, N. (2022). Natural hazards and extreme events in the Baltic Sea region. Earth System Dynamics, 13(1), 251-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-251-2022
  50. Sarwar, H., & Kashani Asl, A. (2016). Assessing the physical vulnerability of Ahar city against the earthquake crisis. Aamish Mohit Quarterly, (34), 87-108. [In Persian]
  51. Shanshan, Y., Guofang, Z., & Jiuan, H. (2011). Damages and Lessons form the Wenchuan earthquake in China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 17, 598–612
  52. Shi, P., Wang, J. A., Xu, W., Ye, T., Yang, S., Liu, L., & Wang, M. (2015). World atlas of natural disaster risk. In World Atlas of natural disaster risk (pp. 309-323). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  53. Tagvi Zavareh, M., Sarmi, H. R., & Rafiyan, M. (2019). in the research of assessing the vulnerability of urban spaces against natural hazards with the approach of physical resilience, a case study: Zargande neighborhood of Tehran. Crisis Management Journal, (18), 127-137. [In Persian]
  54. Tarhan, C., Aydin, C., & Tecim, V. (2016). How can be disaster resilience built with using sustainable development?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 452-459.
  55. Trinh, T. A., Feeny, S., & Posso, A. (2021). The impact of natural disasters and climate change on agriculture: Findings from Vietnam. In Economic effects of natural disasters (pp. 261-280). Academic Press.
  56. UNDRR. (2017) Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. [Online]. Available: https://www.undrr.org/terminology.
  57. UN-HABITAT, (2022). World Cities Report 2022, Envisaging the Future of Cities https://unhabitat.org/wcr/
  58. UN-Habitat. (2015). Un-Habitat Global Activities Report 2015: Increasing Synergy For Greater National Ownership. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Un-Habitat. Un. Retrieved from www.unhabitat.org
  59. UN-HABITAT. (2022). World Cities Report 2022, Envisaging the Future of Cities https://unhabitat.org/wcr/
  60. University of Oxford. (2020). Number of deaths from earthquakes, world. https://ourworldindata org/grapher/earthquake-deaths
  61. Zhang, Y., Weng, W. G., & Huang, Z. L. (2018). A scenario-based model for earthquake emergency management effectiveness evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 197-207.