Sustainable city

Sustainable city

Analyzing the Livability of Worn-out Urban Textures in District 7 of Tehran Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Document Type : Articles extracted from Thesis

Authors
Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jsc.2024.427202.1748
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
Nowadays, one of the main challenges of big cities is the urban worn-out texture. Livability, as one of the important indicators in examining these textures' condition, can help identify their needs. The current research aims to use machine learning modeling methods to analyze the data related to the livability of urban worn-out textures in District 7 of Tehran, including the discovery of patterns and structures in the answers to the questionnaire and their prediction and evaluation. The research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population in this research is the residents of worn-out neighborhoods of District 7 of Tehran, with a number of 190,228 thousand people, and the statistical sample size is 383 people, who were selected by simple random method as a probability sampling. The research data were analyzed using two algorithms as random forest regression and k-means. The results showed that using a random forest regression algorithm, the livability level of eight neighborhoods was predicted, with the Gorgan neighborhood having the highest score and the Shahid neighborhood having the lowest livability score. Also, by using this algorithm, according to the questionnaire questions, it was determined that factors such as access to public transportation and health centers were in the highest ranks. The k-means algorithm divided the questionnaire data into five clusters based on the similarities in the answers to identify different patterns and needs of the residents. In this algorithm, cluster one, with 24% of respondents, showed high dissatisfaction with the quality of the urban environment and public health.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urbanization is increasing rapidly around the world, and it is predicted that by 2050, 68% of the world's population will live in cities. This population growth is associated with challenges related to urban development and excessive expansion of cities. The main focus of urban development should be improving people's quality of life in cities. In this regard, the concept of livability has been proposed as one of the latest theories in urban planning, which refers to people's satisfaction with environmental conditions and interactions and can be investigated at the scale of the city or its smaller parts, such as worn-out neighborhoods. The worn-out texture is one of the problems of Iranian cities, which has become inefficient due to the passage of time or lack of proper planning, and its consequence is the reduction of living conditions, safety, and physical, social, and economic disorders. District 7 of Tehran has more than 300 hectares of worn-out texture, mainly located east of this area. These textures face problems such as insufficient per capita service users, poor quality of buildings, and narrow alleys.  In this research, using machine learning techniques, we seek to extract important features from the questionnaire data on the urban livability of worn-out textures in District 7 of Tehran and identify effective indicators to identify the initiatives that will significantly improve livability.
 
Methodology
The current research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population is all the residents of the blocks of urban worn-out texture in District 7 of Tehran, with a population of 190,228 people. Sampling was done in a simple random and probabilistic manner, and the minimum sample size was estimated to be 383 questionnaires using Cochran's formula. Documentary and field methods were used to collect information. A questionnaire was designed using the Delphi method with 5 dimensions, 22 components, and 158 sub-components, and its validity was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.857. After data collection and pre-processing, analysis was done based on machine learning models. A modeling pipeline was developed to analyze the data and extract insights related to livability drivers. The random forest regression model was used to predict neighborhoods' livability and the questions' importance. Also, an unsupervised k-means model was used to cluster residents based on common patterns of questionnaire responses.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the random forest regression model, Gorgan neighborhood has the highest livability rate in different dimensions with an average score of 5.281. Kaj, Khwaja Nasir, and Qasr neighborhoods are ranked second to fourth, respectively. The neighborhoods of Nizam Abad, Khaje Nizam, Armenians, and Shahid were ranked in the lowest levels of livability. The random forest model with R-squared equal to 0.62 matches the real data well. The random forest model has ranked the importance of questionnaire questions in predicting livability. The top ten features include the distribution of public transportation stations, access to medical centers, access to shopping areas, citizen responsibility, security, housing prices, environment cleanliness, traffic volume, educational space quality, and green space distribution. These factors are aligned with the main pillars of livability and show the importance of access to urban services, environmental conditions, security, educational facilities, and socio-economic conditions. Using the k-means clustering algorithm, the residents of the neighborhoods were grouped into 5 clusters with similar characteristics. The first cluster (24%) is from the low quality of the urban environment and public health, the second cluster (21%) from social welfare problems and quality of life, the third cluster (21%) from the lack of urban facilities and infrastructure, the fourth cluster (16%) from Inadequate welfare and economic situation, and the fifth cluster (18%) are dissatisfied with the problems of development and governance. Some of the results of this research are consistent with research findings that have used machine learning methods to assess livability. Other studies have also reported the difference in the livability level of different neighborhoods. The key role of access to public transportation, medical services, and shopping facilities in determining livability is consistent with the findings of other researchers. The results of this study emphasize the importance of citizens' participation and responsibility in improving livability, which is in line with the recommendations of previous studies. The most important innovations of this research include the use of advanced machine learning algorithms such as random forest and K-means, quantitative prediction of the livability of each neighborhood, extracting useful and interpretable insights from the model results, identifying different groups of residents with different needs, and combining the subjective data of the questionnaire with observations. The methodology used in this research can be generalized to other contexts and urban areas with adjustments.
 
Conclusion
The random forest regression algorithm showed that Gorgan and Shahid neighborhoods got the highest and lowest livability scores, respectively. Factors such as access to public transportation stations and health centers were the most important. The k-means algorithm classified the data into five clusters, and cluster one, including 24% of the respondents, showed high dissatisfaction with the quality of the urban environment and public health. Proposals for the reforms of each neighborhood include Gorgan, supervision of constructions, renovation of dilapidated buildings, creation of parks and recreational spaces; Kaj, continuous communication between people and officials, participation in construction projects, improvement of urban furniture, creation of tarebar market, playground and parking lot; Khajeh Nasir, holding entrance exam classes, creating green and recreational spaces to prevent the gathering of drug addicts; Qasr, skill training and job creation for female heads of the household, creation of large shopping centers; Nizamabad, developing a culture of participation, improving access to services, organizing incompatible businesses, creating parking, removing vermin; Khawaja Nizam al-Molk, widening the roads, creating a parking lot and a small park, supervising medical offices, health education; Armenians, improving the quality of roads, fixing traffic accidents, creating sports complexes, paying attention to green spaces; Shahed, increasing police patrols, installing CCTV cameras, improving street lighting, raising awareness for crime prevention.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors had equal contributions in all stages and sections of conducting the research.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the authorship or publication of this article.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all those who assisted us in conducting this research, especially those who performed the quality assessment of the articles.
Keywords

  1. Adhikari, A. K., & Roy, T. B. (2021). Latent factor analysis and measurement on sustainable urban livability in Siliguri Municipal Corporation, West Bengal through EFA and CFA model. Computational urban science, 1(1), 1-13.
  2. Altrock, U. (2022). Urban livability in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods: The experience of the German program “socially integrative city”. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(5), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.006
  3. Bahadori, B., Rajaee, S.A., & Hatami Nejad, H. (2022). Analysis of urban worn-out fabric regeneration with spatial justice approach (Case study: Nematabad neighborhood, District 19 of Tehran). Geography, 20(74), 21-49. http://dor.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833739.1401.20.74.2.2 [In Persian]
  4. Bakhshi, A., Rasouli, S.H., & Eskandari, R. (2021). Spatial analysis of factors affecting the revitalization of worn-out urban fabrics in Qaemshahr city (with the approach of evaluating government support policies). Urban Environment Planning and Development, 1(4), 29-40.
  5.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.4.3.7 [In Persian]
  6. Bandar Abad, A. (2011). Livable city from fundamentals to meaning. 1st edition. Tehran: Azarakhsh Publications. [In Persian]
  7. Bayramzadeh, N., & Shahsavar, Amin. (2023). Prioritization of urban areas from the perspective of physical and environmental indicators of livability (Case study: 5 regions of Urmia city). Sustainable Urban Development, 4(11), 17-31. doi:10.22034/usd.2023.706523 [In Persian]
  8. Calka, B., Orych, A., Bielecka, E., & Mozuriunaite, S. (2022). The ratio of the land consumption rate to the population growth rate: A framework for the achievement of the spatiotemporal pattern in Poland and Lithuania. Remote sensing, 14(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051074
  9. Cao, Y., Li, F., Xi, X., van Bilsen, D. J. C., & Xu, L. (2021). Urban livability: Agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District, Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128662
  10. Cheshmi, M., Haqzad, A., Ramezanpour, M., & Ebrahimi, L. (2020). Investigation of livability indicators in worn-out and historical fabrics of urban neighborhoods Case study: District 12 of Tehran metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, 3(3), 87-101. doi:10.22034/jsc.2020.210506.1160 [In Persian]
  11. Chi, Y. L., & Mak, H. W. L. (2021). From comparative and statistical assessments of liveability and health conditions of districts in Hong Kong towards future city development. Sustainability, 13(16), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168781
  12. Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj computer science, 7, e623, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623
  13. Emami Najafabadi, S.A., Taghyani, S., & Saberi, H. (2021). Evaluation and explanation of the effectiveness of migrant residents and implementation of intervention plans in worn-out urban fabrics (Case studies of worn-out fabrics of Zeinabiyeh, Qaemiyeh, Hematabad of Isfahan). Social Sciences, 15(1), 138-157. [In Persian]
  14. Gumel, I. A., Aplin, P., Marston, C. G., & Morley, J. (2020). Time-series satellite imagery demonstrates the progressive failure of a city master plan to control urbanization in Abuja, Nigeria. Remote Sensing, 12(7), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071112
  15. Heidari, M.T., Shamai, A., Sassanpour, F., Soleimani, M., & Ahadnejad Roshti, M. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting the livability of worn-out urban fabrics (Case study: Worn-out fabric of the central part of Zanjan city). Geographical Space, 17(59), 1-25. [In Persian]
  16. Hekmatnia, H., Mousavi, M., Sobhani, N., & Salmanzadeh, S. (2022). Analysis and evaluation of livability in worn-out urban fabrics (Case study: Shahindej). Human Settlement Planning Studies (Geographical Perspective), 17(1 (58)), 33-47. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.1.12.2 [In Persian]
  17. Jafari Qasemabad, A., & Hosseini, A.R. (2023). Status of physical and social indicators of livability in worn-out urban fabrics. National Conference on Knowledge-Based Urban Planning and Architecture. [In Persian]
  18. Jahanshahi, M.H. (2003), Worn-out and problematic urban fabrics. Journal of Urban Planning Essays, 4, 17-25. [In Persian]
  19. Jannati, H., Esteqlal, A., Al-Madrassi, S.A., Rezaei, M.R., & Zakerian, M. (2022). Explaining the physical components of improving livability in inefficient urban fabrics (Case study: Worn-out fabric of Dogonbadan city). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 13(50), 131-146. doi:10.30495/jupm.2022.27185.3778 [In Persian]
  20. Jianxiao, L., Han, B. I., & Wang, M. (2020). Using multi-source data to assess livability in Hong Kong at the community-based level: A combined subjective-objective approach. Geography and sustainability, 1(4), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.12.001
  21. Jun, W. U. (2020). The Fourth Paradigm: A Research for the Predictive Model of Livability Based on Machine Learning for Smart City in The Netherlands. Landscape Architecture, 27(5), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.14085/j.fjyl.2020.05.0011.19
  22. Karami, F., Rah Noor, R., & Shojaei Vand, B. (2016). A comparative study of the effect of physical-environmental dimensions on the quality of life in cities Case studies: Ajab Shir and Bonab cities. Urban Research and Planning, 7(27), 59-76. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285229.1395.7.27.4.7 [In Persian]
  23. Karkeh Abadi, Z., & Behrouzi, H. (2022). Investigation and analysis of urban livability components in line with sustainable development (Case study: Qaem Shahr). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 13(51), 215-228. doi:10.30495/jupm.2021.24622.3483 [In Persian]
  24. Khazaeinejad, F. (2023). Identifying the influential driving forces on realization of urban livability (Case study: Central part of Bojnurd city). Human Settlement Planning Studies, 18(3), 145-157. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1402.18.3.10.1 [In Persian]
  25. Khazaeinejad, F., Soleimani Mehranjani, M., & Zanganeh, A. (2018). Evaluation of livability of neighborhoods in District 12 of Tehran. Geography and Urban Space Development, 5(1), 45-70. doi:10.22067/gusd.v5i1.65128 [In Persian]
  26. Khorrami, Z., Ye, T., Sadatmoosavi, A., Mirzaee, M., Fadakar Davarani, M. M., & Khanjani, N. (2021). The indicators and methods used for measuring urban liveability: a scoping review. Reviews on environmental health, 36(3), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2020-0097
  27. Koutra, S., & Ioakimidis, C. S. (2022). Unveiling the Potential of Machine Learning Applications in Urban Planning Challenges. Land, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010083
  28. Kovacs-Györi, A., Ristea, A., Havas, C., Mehaffy, M., Hochmair, H. H., Resch, B., ... & Blaschke, T. (2020). Opportunities and challenges of geospatial analysis for promoting urban livability in the era of big data and machine learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120752
  29. Kutty, A. A., Wakjira, T. G., Kucukvar, M., Abdella, G. M., & Onat, N. C. (2022). Urban resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel machine learning approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
  30. Li, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Nepal, M., Nguyen, K., & Dur, F. (2023). Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Integration for Leveraging Urban Sustainability: A Review and Framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 96, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104653
  31. Liang, X., Liu, Y., & Qiu, T. (2020). Livability assessment of urban communities considering the preferences of different age groups. Complexity, 2020, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8269274
  32. Mahallooji, M., Khademolhosseini, A., Saberi, H., & Qaed Rahmati, S. (2021). Evaluation of factors affecting urban livability in informal settlements, a study of District 14 of Isfahan city. Geography and Environmental Studies, 10(40), 7-20. [In Persian]
  33. Mahdiyoun, J., & Shokouhi, A. (2020). Analysis of physical-environmental indicators of livability of Zanjan city with a futuristic approach. Geographical Space, 20(71), 135-157. [In Persian]
  34. Mahmoudzadeh, H., Nazari, M., & Harischian, M. (2021). Measuring and evaluating the resilience of worn-out urban fabric against earthquake, case study: Shahrekord city. Journal of Geographical Space Management, 11(41), 163-182. doi:10.30488/gps.2021.245297.3294 [In Persian]
  35. Waleed, M., Sajjad, M., Acheampong, A. O., & Alam, M. T. (2023). Towards sustainable and livable cities: leveraging remote sensing, machine learning, and geo-information modelling to explore and predict thermal field variance in response to urban growth. Sustainability, 15(2),1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021416
  36. Mobaraki, O., & Pirkhedranian, S. (2018). Evaluation of citizens' satisfaction with urban furniture (Case study: Marivan city). Urban Management Studies, 10(33), 29-40. [In Persian]
  37. Mohammadi, A., & Pishgar, E. (2018). Analysis of the status of urban furniture and measuring citizens' satisfaction. Case study: The edge of Balikhli Chai River, Ardabil city. Geographical Space Arrangement, 8(27), 1-20. [In Persian]
  38. Mohrekesh, R., Saberi, H., Momeni, M., & Azani, M. (2019). Explanation of physical effective factors on the livability of urban areas (Case study: Areas of Isfahan city). Urban Planning Geography Research, 7(2), 411-429. doi:10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.276471 [In Persian]
  39. Naqibi, F., Saket Hassanlouei, M., & Azhari, A. (2021). Spatial-physical analysis of the vulnerability level of worn-out urban fabrics using VIKOR and ANP (Case study: Central fabric of Urmia city). Human Settlement Planning Studies (Geographical Perspective), 16(4 (57)), 875-896. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1400.16.4.9.8 [In Persian]
  40. Parvizi, R., Molaei Hashjin, N., & Ghoreishi, M. B. (2022). Evaluation of physical indicators affecting livability. Urban Planning Knowledge, 6(3), 139-153. doi:10.22124/upk.2021.18742.1606 [In Persian]
  41. Pourahmad, A., Darban Astaneh, A., Zanganeh Shahraki, S., & Pourqorban, S. (2020). Evaluation and analysis of factors affecting urban livability of Kish Island. Urban Planning Geography Research, 8(1), 1-22. doi:10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.260659.927 [In Persian]
  42. Pourahmad, A., & Hatami, A. (2019). Measuring and evaluating the dimensions and components of urban livability with emphasis on sustainable development (Case study: Nurabad Delfan city). GIS (Geographic Information System in Planning), 37(10), 7-29. [In Persian]
  43. Reades, J., De Souza, J., & Hubbard, P. (2019). Understanding urban gentrification through machine learning. Urban Studies, 56(5), 922-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018789054
  44. Saffari, F., & Nazmfar, H. (2023). Measuring the livability of urban neighborhoods with emphasis on the environmental dimension (Case study of District 3 of Ardabil Municipality). Environmental Science Studies, 8(1), 6220-6228. doi:10.22034/jess.2022.367177.1897 [In Persian]
  45. Salary Moghaddam, Z., Ziari, K., & Hatami Nejad, H. (2019). Measuring and evaluating the livability of urban neighborhoods Case study: District 15 of Tehran metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, 2(3), 41-58. doi:10.22034/jsc.2019.195019.1073 [In Persian]
  46. Saraei, M.H., & Yarahmadi, M. (2022). Identifying livability and evaluating the components affecting livability in urban areas (Case study: Esfarayen city). Geography and Environmental Sustainability (Geographical Research Letter), 12(45), 23-35. doi:10.22126/ges.2022.7545.2513 [In Persian]
  47. Sassanpour, F., Alizadeh, S., & Arabi Moghaddam, H. (2018). Feasibility of livability of urban areas of Urmia with RALSPI model. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences (Geographical Sciences), 18(48), 241-258. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22287736.1397.18.48.14.5 [In Persian]
  48. Sassanpour, F., Tolaei, S., & Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2015). Measuring and evaluating urban livability in twenty-two regions of Tehran metropolis. Regional Planning, 5(18), 27-42. [In Persian]
  49. Shabanzadeh Namini, R., Loda, M., & Meshkini, A. (2021). SWOT Analysis and Developing Strategies for the Realisation of Urban Livability in Tehran. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2020.1827412
  50. Shahivandi, A., Qalehnoui, M., & Alipour Esfahani, M. (2015). Investigation of physical characteristics and their impact on the vitality and livability of old urban neighborhoods; Case study of Sonbolestan neighborhood of Isfahan. Restoration and Architecture of Iran (Restoration of Historical Cultural Works and Fabrics), 5(9), 13-26. [In Persian]
  51. Sharan, Consulting Engineers. (2005). Guide to identifying and intervening in worn-out fabrics. [In Persian]
  52. Sheikh, W. T., & van Ameijde, J. (2022). Promoting livability through urban planning: A comprehensive framework based on the “theory of human needs”. Cities, 131, 103972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972
  53. Soleimani Mehranjani, M., Tolaei, S., Rafieian, M., & Khazaeinejad, F. (2016). Urban livability: Concept, principles, dimensions and indicators. Urban Planning Geography Research, 4(1), 27-50.  doi:10.22059/jurbangeo.2016.58120 [In Persian]
  54. Stanislav, A., & Chin, J. T. (2019). Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs. Sustainable cities and society, 47, 1-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101517
  55. Sujatha, V., Lavanya, G., & Prakash, R. (2023). Quantifying Liveability Using Survey Analysis and Machine Learning Model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021633
  56. Taqavi Zirwani, E., Nazmfar, H., & Mansourian, H. (2023). Measuring the dimensions and indicators of urban livability (Case study: Sari city). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 14(54), 1-14. doi:10.30495/jupm.2021.27915.3874 [In Persian]
  57. Taleshi Anbouhi, M., Aghaei Zadeh, E., & Jafari Mehrabi, M. (2019). Evaluation of livability in worn-out urban fabrics Case study: District 1 of Qazvin city. Sustainable City, 2(3), 59-78. [In Persian]
  58. Taleshi, M., Aghaei Zadeh, E., & Jafari Mehrabi, M. (2019). Structural analysis of livability of worn-out urban fabrics with a futuristic approach (Case study: Worn-out fabric of District 1 of Qazvin city). Urban Research and Planning, 10(39), 117-129. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285229.1398.10.39.9.7 [In Persian]
  59. Teo, S. (2014). Political tool or quality experience? Urban livability and the Singaporean state’s global city aspirations. Urban Geography, 35(6), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.924233
  60. Tsagkis, P., Bakogiannis, E., & Nikitas, A. (2023). Analysing urban growth using machine learning and open data: An artificial neural network modelled case study of five Greek cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104337
  61. Veisi Nab, B., Babaei Aghdam, F., & Ghorbani, R. (2019). Identifying and prioritizing factors related to the economic dimension of urban livability (Case study: Tabriz metropolis). Urban Planning Geography Research, 7(1), 127-149. doi:10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.271201 [In Persian]
  62. Zahedi Yeganeh, A., Shams, M., & Khademolhosseini, A. (2022). Analysis of urban livability in Isfahan metropolis with emphasis on socio-cultural indicators. Human Settlement Planning Studies, 17(4), 933-946. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.4.6.2 [In Persian]
  63. Ziari, K., Hatami, A., Mesbahi, S., & Ashouri, H. (2019). Evaluation and analysis of dimensions and components of livability of small towns in line with sustainable development (Case study: Bandar Deylam). Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 9(36), 569-586. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.9.4.7.7 [In Persian]
  64. www.region7.tehran.ir