Analysis of the Position of Urban Brand Components Case Study: Maragheh City

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran

2 M.A student of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran

10.22034/jsc.2020.202425.1127

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban branding is a valuable tool for cities to effectively manage domestic and foreign opportunities and turn them into competitive advantages. Many of these areas use branding techniques to differentiate their identities from others or to make what they offer unique. Cities and countries need to take advantage of this process to survive in today's competitive world and stability of their competitive advantage. Urban branding is a new topic in the field of urban studies and the history of is related to the last two or three decades. The present study seeks to identify the potentials and constraints that Maragheh city faces in order to use its urban branding capabilities and to recognize priorities for planning and orientation of urban branding. To this end, the research hypotheses are that: Maragheh is in a desirable position in terms of (economic, social, cultural and environmental) urban brand. And the second hypothesis is that there seems to be a significant difference between the components of the urban brand in Maragheh. Evaluating these hypotheses will determine not only the status of each component for urban branding, but also the components that are most strongly correlated with urban branding. Now, according to the principal of this issue, one of the most important means of distinguishing and recognizing the city's reputation is to create urban branding. One of its most significant goals is to capture factors contributing to economic growth such as purchasing power, investment, product capability and city-wide innovation.
 Methodology
This research is done based on descriptive-analytic and documentary-library studies, as well as field studies (questionnaire and interview), and the type of this research is applied. In this regard, for each of the studied components, the indicators and descriptors were designed and attended by experts in Delphi Method in the form of multi-stage questionnaires. The provided questionnaires were given to the statistical community by a panel consisting of 15 experts from Maragheh city in different specialties. The obtained data were analyzed by Mini-Tab software. Validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by the professors. Cronbach's alpha method was used to reliability evaluation of measure instrument, which indicates the data is reliable (0.93).  One sample t-test was used to investigate the first hypothesis of research and to identify the status of the components of urban brand. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used to examine the significance of differences between components of urban brand. Then, by using of the linear regression, correlation between components and brand was obtained.
 Results and Discussions
The results of the one-sample t-test for the first hypothesis show that the average social component in Maragheh is 2.718, which is smaller than the baseline (3.00), indicating an undesirable status of the components. Also, the P-value obtained (1.00) is greater than the alpha at the significance level of 0.05. With 0.95 confidence, it can be concluded that the social component of the urban brand in Maragheh is not in a favorable situation. One of the main reasons for the powerless status of the social component is the low level of cooperation of urban managers with the private sector, low participation of people in the implementation of urban plans, high poverty in some neighborhoods, etc. The calculated average for the economic component is 2.931 which is smaller than the base number (3.00). The P-value (0.998) was also greater than the alpha at the significant level of 0.7. It can be concluded with 0.95 confidence that the economic component of the urban brand in Maragheh is undesirable. One of the main reasons for the low economic component is the low level of domestic and foreign investment in the city, the low quality and quantity of business centers and concerning cultural components, since the median value 3.00 is within the confidence interval (2.989–3.161 / 161), with respect to the P-value (0.44) that is smaller than the alpha at the level of 0.7. As a result, the successor assumption is accepted. then, that the cultural components of the brand in Maragheh are in desirable standing. One of the main reasons for the desirability of the cultural component is the city's historical presence, the presence of 300 recorded monuments and etc. The average environmental component of the brand is 3.505, which indicates a higher value than the baseline (3.000) and the condition is favorable and Null hypothesis is rejected. The obtained p-value (0.00) is also smaller than the alpha at the level of 0.5, thus the successor assumption is accepted. Therefore, it is concluded that the environmental component of the brand in Maragheh is in good condition. The main reasons for the high environmental footprint are: favorable climate and pollution, being a paleontological indicator of the world's fossil paradise, having many springs, being a city garden.  The test results for the second hypothesis show that the p-value obtained is (0.000) which is lower than the alpha level of 0.05 which means that there is a significant difference between the brand components in Maragheh.
 Conclusion
The present study investigated the status of urban brand components in Maragheh. The results of the desirability of the studied components in Maragheh showed that the economic and social components are not favorable for shaping the brand, while the cultural and environmental components are relatively desirable. However, these components are also close to the mean of 3 and are relatively low. The results show that cultural and environmental factors have the highest chance of investment and brand acquisition for Maragheh city. Also the results of analysis of variance and linear regression showed that although the condition of cultural and environmental components is more desirable in this city; social and economic factors need special attention and are most associated with the urban brand in order to create brand for this city. In other words, to be able to take advantage of the city's cultural and environmental potential in branding, the level of social and economic components must also be improved. According to the research findings, the city's cultural and natural-environmental potentials are the best options for branding Maragheh.

Keywords


1)    احمدی، فضل‌الله؛ نصیریانی، خدیجه؛ اباذری، پروانه (1387) تکنیک دلفی: ابزاری در تحقیق، مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، دوره 8، شماره 1، صص. 185-175.
2)    پرچکانی، پروانه (1395) تأثیر مؤلفه‌های فرهنگی در معماری برند شهرها با رویکرد گردشگری؛ مطالعه موردی: لیون فرانسه. فصلنامه هنر و تمدن شرق، دوره 4، شماره 12، صص. 50-41.
3)     تاج‌زاده نمین، ابوالفضل و اسمعیل مشرقی، فاطمه (1392) اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های ارزش‌های ویژه برند در مقصد داخلی گردشگران از دیدگاه گردشگران داخلی، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، دوره 8، شماره 24، صص. 35-58
4)    دیواندری، علی و اخلاصی، امیر (1391) طراحی مدل بومی برند سازی برای کلان پروژه‌های چندمنظوره کشور و پیاده‌سازی و آزمون آن در یک مجموعه چندمنظوره، فصلنامه تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین. دوره 2، شماره 2، شماره پیاپی (5)، صص. 21-1.
5)    سرور، هوشنگ و نعمتی، محمدرضا (1395) جغرافیای مراغه. چاپ اول، تبریز: انتشارات عمید.
6)    سرور، هوشنگ (1398) شناسایی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری بر اساس شاخص‌های کالبدی (منطقه یک شهر تبریز)، مجله شهر پایدار، دوره 2، شماره 1، صص. 14-1.
7)    قلی‌پور، آرین؛ ابویی اردکان، محمد؛ پیدایش، الهه (1390) بررسی عوامل مؤثر در شکل‌گیری تصویر شهر در راستای برند سازی مؤثر شهری. نشریه هنرهای زیبا-معماری و شهرسازی، دوره 3، شماره 45، صص. 48-39.
8)    محمدپور زرندی، حسین؛ حسنی، علی؛ امینیان، ناصر (1395) عوامل مؤثر بر برند شهری و اولویت‌بندی آن‌ها از دیدگاه گردشگران بین‌المللی: مطالعه موردی برج میلاد، فصلنامه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، دوره 4، شماره 14، صص. 135-115.
9)    منوریان، عباس؛ ابوئی اردکان، محمد؛ پورموسوی، موسی؛ رحیمیان، اشرف (1392) مدل فرآیندی برند سازی شهری برای کلان‌شهرهای ایران، فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، دوره 4، شماره 13، صص. 63-41.
10) موحد، علی (1390) بازاریابی گردشگری برای شهرها، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات آذرخش.
11) مرادی، فاطمه؛ زرآبادی، سعیده ؛ ماجدی، حمید (1397) تبیین مدل برند سازی شهری در راستای ارتقای رقابت‌پذیری و رشد اقتصاد شهری با استفاده از مدل F’ANP، فصلنامه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، دوره 6، شماره 2، صص.56-33.
12) محمودی آذر، شیرزاد و داودپور، زهره (1397) برند سازی شهری برای تحقق شهر خلاق؛ ارائه نظریه‌ای داده بنیاد (موردمطالعه: شهر ارومیه)، مجله توسعه محلی (روستایی-شهری)، دوره 10، شماره 1، صص. 136-115.
13) منصوری، نسیم و بیات، آتوسا (1396) استراتژی برندینگ شهری در جهت توسعه صنعت گردشگری و توانمندسازی اقتصادی در شهر زنجان، کنفرانس بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و شهرسازی ایران معاصر، مردادماه 1396، تهران، ایران.
14) موسوی، میرنجف؛ آهار، حسن؛ منوچهری، ایوب؛ قیصری، حدیثه (1397) تحلیل اثرات رشد پراکنده رویی شهری بر سرمایه اجتماعی (شهر مراغه)، مجله شهر پایدار، دوره 1، شماره 3، صص. 16-1.
15) ناظمی، الهام و مظاهری، شادی (1395) تأثیر برند سازی شهری بر منظر شهری پایدار. سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی تحقیقات در عمران، معماری، شهرسازی و محیط‌زیست، رم، ایتالیا.
16) یزدان‌پناه شاه‌آبادی، محمدرضا؛ سجادزاده، حسن؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی (1398) تبیین مدل مفهومی برند سازی مکان: مروری بر ادبیات نظری، مجله باغ نظر، دوره 16، شماره 71، صص. 19-34.
17)  Anholt, Simon. (2007) Competitive Identity, The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions, Palgrave Macmillian: London, UK.
18)  Anholt, Simon. (2010) Places: Identity, Image and Reputation, Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.
19)  Bassem, Doha. (2019) City Marketing & Urban Branding: A New Way to Identify Egyptian Cities through Creating Positive Public Mental Image, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Cities’ Identity Through Architecture and Arts, The Academic Research Community Publication.
20)  Decline, Jean. (2010) A Shared Vision on City BrandinginEurope://www.eurocities.eu.
21)  Dinnie, Keith. (2011) Introduction to the Theory of City Branding. In City Branding, Palgrave Macmillian: London, UK.
22)  Fernández, Daniel Barrera. & Meethan, Kevin. (2014) The Relationship of City Branding and Tourist Promotion: The Case of Plymouth (UK) and Malaga (Spain), Athens, Journal of Tourism, Vol.1, No.3, pp.217-226.
23)  Konecnik, Maja. & Gartner, William. C. (2007) Customer-based Brand Equity for a Destination, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol.34, No.2, pp.400-421.
24)  Munda, Giuseppe. (2009) A Conflict Analysis Approach for Illuminating Distributional Issues in Sustainability Policy, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.194, No.1, pp. 307-322.
25)  Martinez Salinas, Eva & Pina Perez, Jose Miguel. (2009) Modelling the Brand Extension Influence on Brand image, Journal in Business Research, Vol.62, No.1, pp.50-60.
26)  26) Ramli, Fariha & Salleh, Dani. (2018) A Review of Place Branding Strategy in City Planning, International Journal of Innovation research & Development, Vol.7, No.3, pp. 191-195.
27)  Rehan, Reeman M. & Mohammed Refaat, M. & Abdelaal, Ghina Maher. & Hakim, Rouba Mayyas Gamal. & Ghadah M. Baraat. (2019) Cultural Urban Branding as an Approach Towards Sustainability, Resourceedings, Vol. 2, No.1, pp.11-1.
28)  Ramli, Fariha & Salleh, Dani. (2018) Analysis of Public Participation in Place Branding: A Case Study of City of Alor Setar, Malaysia, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, Vol.7, No.4, pp.1533-1543.
29)  Zenker, Sebastian & Braun, Erik. (2010) Branding a City: A Conceptual Approach for Place Branding and Place Brand Management. Paper presented at The 39th EMAC Annual Conference 2010, Frederiksberg, Denmark.